


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exclusive: Gil Gerard Joins Cawley&#8217;s Buck Rogers Web Series + Star Trek Phase II Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2009/06/17/exclusive-gil-gerard-joins-cawleys-buck-rogers-web-series-star-trek-phase-ii-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/06/17/exclusive-gil-gerard-joins-cawleys-buck-rogers-web-series-star-trek-phase-ii-update/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:56:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Lutz</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/06/17/exclusive-gil-gerard-joins-cawleys-buck-rogers-web-series-star-trek-phase-ii-update/comment-page-3/#comment-2082017</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Lutz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=4745#comment-2082017</guid>
		<description>The best people to work with and I am very glad to be a part of Star Trek Phase II.
It is worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best people to work with and I am very glad to be a part of Star Trek Phase II.<br />
It is worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth Thomson Jr.</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/06/17/exclusive-gil-gerard-joins-cawleys-buck-rogers-web-series-star-trek-phase-ii-update/comment-page-3/#comment-2068553</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Thomson Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 07:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=4745#comment-2068553</guid>
		<description>I was there for the &quot;Kitumba&quot; shoot and I had the honor of being in there working with these fine people for two weeks straight.  What a wonderful experience it was!  &quot;Kitumba&quot; will rock you!

Ken Thomson
aka Captain Ray Martin, USS Saladin NCC-500</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was there for the &#8220;Kitumba&#8221; shoot and I had the honor of being in there working with these fine people for two weeks straight.  What a wonderful experience it was!  &#8220;Kitumba&#8221; will rock you!</p>
<p>Ken Thomson<br />
aka Captain Ray Martin, USS Saladin NCC-500</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patty W</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/06/17/exclusive-gil-gerard-joins-cawleys-buck-rogers-web-series-star-trek-phase-ii-update/comment-page-3/#comment-2032796</link>
		<dc:creator>Patty W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 03:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=4745#comment-2032796</guid>
		<description># 140... yes. Check out this clip on YouTube from Enemy: Starfleet for the explanation 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdAUh8GdFj4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 140&#8230; yes. Check out this clip on YouTube from Enemy: Starfleet for the explanation </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdAUh8GdFj4" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdAUh8GdFj4</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pony Horton</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/06/17/exclusive-gil-gerard-joins-cawleys-buck-rogers-web-series-star-trek-phase-ii-update/comment-page-3/#comment-1982787</link>
		<dc:creator>Pony Horton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=4745#comment-1982787</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;ll notice that top photo of James as Kirk, with the Klingons behind him... well, I was right there next to the camera, and when I saw James and the others standing there for that scene, it suddenly occurred to me...&quot;Holy crap! This REALLY IS Star Trek!&quot;

This show KITUMBA is gonna look GREAT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;ll notice that top photo of James as Kirk, with the Klingons behind him&#8230; well, I was right there next to the camera, and when I saw James and the others standing there for that scene, it suddenly occurred to me&#8230;&#8221;Holy crap! This REALLY IS Star Trek!&#8221;</p>
<p>This show KITUMBA is gonna look GREAT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBigCW</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/06/17/exclusive-gil-gerard-joins-cawleys-buck-rogers-web-series-star-trek-phase-ii-update/comment-page-3/#comment-1937823</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBigCW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 22:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=4745#comment-1937823</guid>
		<description>I wonder if Gil will play a new character or one of the classic ones? (Maybe Dr.Huer or Black Barney perhaps?) 

Chekov in a red shirt means he&#039;s going to be Security Chief as he was in ST:TMP  I take it? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if Gil will play a new character or one of the classic ones? (Maybe Dr.Huer or Black Barney perhaps?) </p>
<p>Chekov in a red shirt means he&#8217;s going to be Security Chief as he was in ST:TMP  I take it? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Hartman</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/06/17/exclusive-gil-gerard-joins-cawleys-buck-rogers-web-series-star-trek-phase-ii-update/comment-page-3/#comment-1935854</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Hartman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=4745#comment-1935854</guid>
		<description>@138 - LOL! Nope, Bobby is no Pee Wee...

Remember, Buck Rogers in his seminal incarnation is in his early twenties. So, Bobby is in the right age range for the character.

I admit to being skeptical about Bobby&#039;s casting too. But, Retro Films has a clear vision about this new series and I&#039;m just going to sit back and see what they produce.

Bobby is a good guy, and I have no doubt he&#039;ll put his best effort into the role.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@138 &#8211; LOL! Nope, Bobby is no Pee Wee&#8230;</p>
<p>Remember, Buck Rogers in his seminal incarnation is in his early twenties. So, Bobby is in the right age range for the character.</p>
<p>I admit to being skeptical about Bobby&#8217;s casting too. But, Retro Films has a clear vision about this new series and I&#8217;m just going to sit back and see what they produce.</p>
<p>Bobby is a good guy, and I have no doubt he&#8217;ll put his best effort into the role.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Wellsford-James</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/06/17/exclusive-gil-gerard-joins-cawleys-buck-rogers-web-series-star-trek-phase-ii-update/comment-page-3/#comment-1933595</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Wellsford-James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=4745#comment-1933595</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry but that new guy aint Buck Rogers. Pee Wee Herman maybe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry but that new guy aint Buck Rogers. Pee Wee Herman maybe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Lynch</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/06/17/exclusive-gil-gerard-joins-cawleys-buck-rogers-web-series-star-trek-phase-ii-update/comment-page-3/#comment-1931762</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Lynch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=4745#comment-1931762</guid>
		<description>I just don&#039;t understand why Paramount won&#039;t throw a few million dollars towards James Cawley and let him make a full blown series of original Trek, which would be screened on cable television or something other than web based.

I would imagine that it would make a shed load of money for both parties and we would get to see a regular supply of good, new TOS episodes.

After all, we still need our fix, and a movie every couple of years is just not good enough....

Come on Paramount, what about it?
James C., has the thought ever crossed your mind?

My deepest thanks to James and Team for what they continue to give us, for free no less!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t understand why Paramount won&#8217;t throw a few million dollars towards James Cawley and let him make a full blown series of original Trek, which would be screened on cable television or something other than web based.</p>
<p>I would imagine that it would make a shed load of money for both parties and we would get to see a regular supply of good, new TOS episodes.</p>
<p>After all, we still need our fix, and a movie every couple of years is just not good enough&#8230;.</p>
<p>Come on Paramount, what about it?<br />
James C., has the thought ever crossed your mind?</p>
<p>My deepest thanks to James and Team for what they continue to give us, for free no less!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy Fontaine</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/06/17/exclusive-gil-gerard-joins-cawleys-buck-rogers-web-series-star-trek-phase-ii-update/comment-page-3/#comment-1930847</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy Fontaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 06:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=4745#comment-1930847</guid>
		<description>James and Company, every time I see pictures and final products from your Star Trek projects I am inspired.

You continue to develop and expand on your love of Star Trek as well as showing what volunteering, passion and the desire to improve can do for fan fiction.  To this day, I still hold New Voyages/Phase 2 as the epitome of what fans can do.

It&#039;s astonishing how you guys started out with an Canon XL1s, moved onto some P2-based camcorders to the uber-awesome (and last time I checked costed your soul) RED camera.  Just the photos alone give your production far more &quot;professional&quot; level of presentation compared to a lot of professional productions (for those that don&#039;t know, RED is a new-ish type of camera that takes HUGE photos and film speeds and creates absolutely gorgeous video, while being extremely light and has the ability to use 35mm film lenses and accessories).  Star Trek TNG took forever to even get to a cinematic level that you have achieved already with only a few episodes under your belts.  And the respect for quality always blows me away.

I can only hope that any production I work on in the future could be even half of what you guys are doing.  And I, for one, appreciate everything you have done.

All that being said, I don&#039;t understand why so many feel the need to bash these people who are doing a lot more than ANY other fan production has been able to do.  And to reiterate, if you think you can do any better, put your money where your mouth is.

On top of that, bashing the snot out of JJ Abrams for the new movie.  If you people who love bashing it had ANY understanding of what is required to get a modern-day joe-blow audience to see a movie, you would understand they had to start somewhere.  And this was it.  The fact it is bringing in so much money increases the chances we will see something closer to the ideals held for Trek originally.  On top of all that, you pin this all on JJ Abrams, when he is also working with a script by two extremely talented individuals who UNDERSTAND how to get an audience to come back.  They were also working under the watchful eye of producers who vetoed anything they felt would hurt the movies reception by modern audiences.  People shouldn&#039;t look at this movie as part of what has passed.  The new movie is something new and different, and really, who are we to say that the movie&#039;s physics are wrong when we only have an early 21st century understanding of the universe around us.  Were there people in the 60s who said communicators could never happen?  Did they say quantum teleportation was a myth?

Consider the movie just part of the process of bringing real human stories back to the forefront of their storytelling.  They had to start somewhere.

James Cawley and his crew didn&#039;t NEED to do that, they simply stepped in where TOS left off and, in my opinion, updated it where necessary but still told relevant tales.  I&#039;ve loved the last three episodes and look forward to seeing what new fx, acting and scripts they come up with.  Any aspiring filmmaker would be wise to follow how things develop and pick up on how things change and are improved.  Kind of like a ladder to see how one group evolves their products to match with improved resources.

And for anyone bellyaching about any of this, really, if you haven&#039;t noticed, today&#039;s television doesn&#039;t tell much about the human condition, throw topics on their ear or force us to look at who we are; they generally  lean towards telling stories for people so they can feel that someone else&#039;s life sucks more than theirs.  Personally, I can anxiously await 1 or 2 episodes a year of Phase 2 for quality story telling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James and Company, every time I see pictures and final products from your Star Trek projects I am inspired.</p>
<p>You continue to develop and expand on your love of Star Trek as well as showing what volunteering, passion and the desire to improve can do for fan fiction.  To this day, I still hold New Voyages/Phase 2 as the epitome of what fans can do.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s astonishing how you guys started out with an Canon XL1s, moved onto some P2-based camcorders to the uber-awesome (and last time I checked costed your soul) RED camera.  Just the photos alone give your production far more &#8220;professional&#8221; level of presentation compared to a lot of professional productions (for those that don&#8217;t know, RED is a new-ish type of camera that takes HUGE photos and film speeds and creates absolutely gorgeous video, while being extremely light and has the ability to use 35mm film lenses and accessories).  Star Trek TNG took forever to even get to a cinematic level that you have achieved already with only a few episodes under your belts.  And the respect for quality always blows me away.</p>
<p>I can only hope that any production I work on in the future could be even half of what you guys are doing.  And I, for one, appreciate everything you have done.</p>
<p>All that being said, I don&#8217;t understand why so many feel the need to bash these people who are doing a lot more than ANY other fan production has been able to do.  And to reiterate, if you think you can do any better, put your money where your mouth is.</p>
<p>On top of that, bashing the snot out of JJ Abrams for the new movie.  If you people who love bashing it had ANY understanding of what is required to get a modern-day joe-blow audience to see a movie, you would understand they had to start somewhere.  And this was it.  The fact it is bringing in so much money increases the chances we will see something closer to the ideals held for Trek originally.  On top of all that, you pin this all on JJ Abrams, when he is also working with a script by two extremely talented individuals who UNDERSTAND how to get an audience to come back.  They were also working under the watchful eye of producers who vetoed anything they felt would hurt the movies reception by modern audiences.  People shouldn&#8217;t look at this movie as part of what has passed.  The new movie is something new and different, and really, who are we to say that the movie&#8217;s physics are wrong when we only have an early 21st century understanding of the universe around us.  Were there people in the 60s who said communicators could never happen?  Did they say quantum teleportation was a myth?</p>
<p>Consider the movie just part of the process of bringing real human stories back to the forefront of their storytelling.  They had to start somewhere.</p>
<p>James Cawley and his crew didn&#8217;t NEED to do that, they simply stepped in where TOS left off and, in my opinion, updated it where necessary but still told relevant tales.  I&#8217;ve loved the last three episodes and look forward to seeing what new fx, acting and scripts they come up with.  Any aspiring filmmaker would be wise to follow how things develop and pick up on how things change and are improved.  Kind of like a ladder to see how one group evolves their products to match with improved resources.</p>
<p>And for anyone bellyaching about any of this, really, if you haven&#8217;t noticed, today&#8217;s television doesn&#8217;t tell much about the human condition, throw topics on their ear or force us to look at who we are; they generally  lean towards telling stories for people so they can feel that someone else&#8217;s life sucks more than theirs.  Personally, I can anxiously await 1 or 2 episodes a year of Phase 2 for quality story telling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: druzilla</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/06/17/exclusive-gil-gerard-joins-cawleys-buck-rogers-web-series-star-trek-phase-ii-update/comment-page-3/#comment-1930252</link>
		<dc:creator>druzilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 01:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=4745#comment-1930252</guid>
		<description>Love, love Bobby from his audition for Hidden Frontier and through Blood &amp; Fire but that hair is just terrifying.  Gil is looking a bit better than he has in recent years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love, love Bobby from his audition for Hidden Frontier and through Blood &amp; Fire but that hair is just terrifying.  Gil is looking a bit better than he has in recent years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
