


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UPDATED: Star Trek&#8217;s Surprising 7th Weekend At Box Office + More ST09 Tidbits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2009/06/22/st09-tidbits-weekend-box-office-interview-bits-from-pine-abrams-nimoy-kurtzman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/06/22/st09-tidbits-weekend-box-office-interview-bits-from-pine-abrams-nimoy-kurtzman/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:35:13 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: screaming satellite</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/06/22/st09-tidbits-weekend-box-office-interview-bits-from-pine-abrams-nimoy-kurtzman/comment-page-3/#comment-1950101</link>
		<dc:creator>screaming satellite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=4959#comment-1950101</guid>
		<description>104 - wow i never realised that about just adding 300 years onto the years TOS was made!...yeh those years would really go against the NCC1701 being in the opening in 2233...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>104 &#8211; wow i never realised that about just adding 300 years onto the years TOS was made!&#8230;yeh those years would really go against the NCC1701 being in the opening in 2233&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nanook177</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/06/22/st09-tidbits-weekend-box-office-interview-bits-from-pine-abrams-nimoy-kurtzman/comment-page-3/#comment-1949028</link>
		<dc:creator>Nanook177</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 01:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=4959#comment-1949028</guid>
		<description>I took my dad to see it on Monday for a Father&#039;s Day gift and he LOVED it. He called the best cinematic ride since &quot;Raiders of the Lost Ark.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took my dad to see it on Monday for a Father&#8217;s Day gift and he LOVED it. He called the best cinematic ride since &#8220;Raiders of the Lost Ark.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Closettrekker</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/06/22/st09-tidbits-weekend-box-office-interview-bits-from-pine-abrams-nimoy-kurtzman/comment-page-3/#comment-1947850</link>
		<dc:creator>Closettrekker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=4959#comment-1947850</guid>
		<description>#103---&quot;And explain how those numbers line up again: The Cage happened 13 years before the Menagerie, Spock served with Pike for 11 years before Kirk took command, so despite this being an early 1st season episode, it is actually taking place during the 3rd year of the 5 year mission, or Spock served with Kirk for 2 years before the 5 year mission started?&quot;

Conventional wisdom among canonistas (and Memory Alpha) is that the events depicted in &quot;The Menagerie&quot; take place in 2267. The method behind this is simple. Add 300 years to the production date of a TOS episode, and there you go. 

2265-2266: 1st year
2266-2267: 2nd year
2267-2268: 3rd year
2268-2269: 4th year
2269-2270: 5th year

For example, &quot;The Deadly Years&quot; was produced in 1967. Kirk is born in 2233, and in TDY, claims to be 34 years old. 2233+34 years=2267. &quot;Space Seed&quot; was also produced in 1967, therefore TWOK takes place circa 2282 (2267+15 years=2282).

Since Spock&#039;s court-martial, as depicted in &quot;The Menagerie&quot;, takes place in 2267, 13 years prior to that (the events depicted on the viewscreen) would be 2254.

2254+11 years (approximate time Spock spent serving under Pike)=2265 (the start of the 5 year mission under JTK).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#103&#8212;&#8221;And explain how those numbers line up again: The Cage happened 13 years before the Menagerie, Spock served with Pike for 11 years before Kirk took command, so despite this being an early 1st season episode, it is actually taking place during the 3rd year of the 5 year mission, or Spock served with Kirk for 2 years before the 5 year mission started?&#8221;</p>
<p>Conventional wisdom among canonistas (and Memory Alpha) is that the events depicted in &#8220;The Menagerie&#8221; take place in 2267. The method behind this is simple. Add 300 years to the production date of a TOS episode, and there you go. </p>
<p>2265-2266: 1st year<br />
2266-2267: 2nd year<br />
2267-2268: 3rd year<br />
2268-2269: 4th year<br />
2269-2270: 5th year</p>
<p>For example, &#8220;The Deadly Years&#8221; was produced in 1967. Kirk is born in 2233, and in TDY, claims to be 34 years old. 2233+34 years=2267. &#8220;Space Seed&#8221; was also produced in 1967, therefore TWOK takes place circa 2282 (2267+15 years=2282).</p>
<p>Since Spock&#8217;s court-martial, as depicted in &#8220;The Menagerie&#8221;, takes place in 2267, 13 years prior to that (the events depicted on the viewscreen) would be 2254.</p>
<p>2254+11 years (approximate time Spock spent serving under Pike)=2265 (the start of the 5 year mission under JTK).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/06/22/st09-tidbits-weekend-box-office-interview-bits-from-pine-abrams-nimoy-kurtzman/comment-page-3/#comment-1947738</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=4959#comment-1947738</guid>
		<description>#102. An interim captain is also precluded by Kirk&#039;s subsequent comment that he &quot;took over the Enterprise from him&quot;. So I think there is no question about that. The dialogue is just poorly written and not well thought out. Mendez&#039; comment that &quot;He&#039;s about your age&quot; makes no sense given the time scale mentioned, making Pike roughly 20 during the Cage. Since we know Mendez was as illusion from the shuttlecraft onward, once has to wonder how much of the events on the starbase were illusion. 

And explain how those numbers line up again: The Cage happened 13 years before the Menagerie, Spock served with Pike for 11 years before Kirk took command, so despite this being an early 1st season episode, it is actually taking place during the 3rd year of the 5 year mission, or Spock served with Kirk for 2 years before the 5 year mission started?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#102. An interim captain is also precluded by Kirk&#8217;s subsequent comment that he &#8220;took over the Enterprise from him&#8221;. So I think there is no question about that. The dialogue is just poorly written and not well thought out. Mendez&#8217; comment that &#8220;He&#8217;s about your age&#8221; makes no sense given the time scale mentioned, making Pike roughly 20 during the Cage. Since we know Mendez was as illusion from the shuttlecraft onward, once has to wonder how much of the events on the starbase were illusion. </p>
<p>And explain how those numbers line up again: The Cage happened 13 years before the Menagerie, Spock served with Pike for 11 years before Kirk took command, so despite this being an early 1st season episode, it is actually taking place during the 3rd year of the 5 year mission, or Spock served with Kirk for 2 years before the 5 year mission started?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Closettrekker</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/06/22/st09-tidbits-weekend-box-office-interview-bits-from-pine-abrams-nimoy-kurtzman/comment-page-3/#comment-1947398</link>
		<dc:creator>Closettrekker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=4959#comment-1947398</guid>
		<description>#99---&quot;In contemporary navies, I don’t know it is more usual or UNunusual that one Captain directly relieves his predecessor.&quot;

Actually, it is standard practice. In fact, there is even an official &quot;Change Of Command Ceremony&quot;, in which a Captain relinquishes responsibility for the vessel to his successor after the orders are read.

&quot;But if it is MORE usual, then we may be able to infer another Captain commanding the Enterprise between Pike and Kirk.&quot;

That would seem to be precluded by Spock&#039;s claim that he served with Pike for a total of around 11 years (unless he followed Pike somewhere else after the Enterprise, only to return when Kirk was given command), coupled with the fact that the events depicted on the viewscreen occured 13 years before the court-martial, which takes place in 2267. VOY &quot;Q2&quot; establishes that the five year mission under Kirk ended in 2270, which in turn suggests that Kirk took command directly from Pike in 2265.

Moreover, Pike&#039;s promotion to &quot;Fleet Captain&quot; likely occurs on the same day as the change of command. 

What doesn&#039;t make sense is Commodore Mendez&#039;s question in the first place. It seems unlikely that he would not know that Kirk succeeded Pike in commadning the Enterprise, which would suggest that they would indeed have met before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#99&#8212;&#8221;In contemporary navies, I don’t know it is more usual or UNunusual that one Captain directly relieves his predecessor.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, it is standard practice. In fact, there is even an official &#8220;Change Of Command Ceremony&#8221;, in which a Captain relinquishes responsibility for the vessel to his successor after the orders are read.</p>
<p>&#8220;But if it is MORE usual, then we may be able to infer another Captain commanding the Enterprise between Pike and Kirk.&#8221;</p>
<p>That would seem to be precluded by Spock&#8217;s claim that he served with Pike for a total of around 11 years (unless he followed Pike somewhere else after the Enterprise, only to return when Kirk was given command), coupled with the fact that the events depicted on the viewscreen occured 13 years before the court-martial, which takes place in 2267. VOY &#8220;Q2&#8243; establishes that the five year mission under Kirk ended in 2270, which in turn suggests that Kirk took command directly from Pike in 2265.</p>
<p>Moreover, Pike&#8217;s promotion to &#8220;Fleet Captain&#8221; likely occurs on the same day as the change of command. </p>
<p>What doesn&#8217;t make sense is Commodore Mendez&#8217;s question in the first place. It seems unlikely that he would not know that Kirk succeeded Pike in commadning the Enterprise, which would suggest that they would indeed have met before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Smith</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/06/22/st09-tidbits-weekend-box-office-interview-bits-from-pine-abrams-nimoy-kurtzman/comment-page-3/#comment-1947145</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=4959#comment-1947145</guid>
		<description>George Kirk is still alive in the Prime Universe, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Kirk is still alive in the Prime Universe, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Dunsel</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/06/22/st09-tidbits-weekend-box-office-interview-bits-from-pine-abrams-nimoy-kurtzman/comment-page-2/#comment-1944715</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Dunsel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=4959#comment-1944715</guid>
		<description>#21 Steve 2 &quot;#12 - But, why do I crave Buffalo Chicken Wings?&quot;

Hunh?  I think whatever reference you intended went zooming right past me at about Warp 10.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#21 Steve 2 &#8220;#12 &#8211; But, why do I crave Buffalo Chicken Wings?&#8221;</p>
<p>Hunh?  I think whatever reference you intended went zooming right past me at about Warp 10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Dunsel</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/06/22/st09-tidbits-weekend-box-office-interview-bits-from-pine-abrams-nimoy-kurtzman/comment-page-2/#comment-1944707</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Dunsel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=4959#comment-1944707</guid>
		<description>93. Closettrekker - &quot;The only Captains of the original NCC-1701 referenced or depicted in live action Trek are Pike, Kirk, Decker, and Spock.&quot;

Quite correct.  But there&#039;s one thing in The Menagerie that has always left me wondering.  If I recallthe dialogue correctly Kirk mentions that he met Pike when Pike was &quot;promoted to Fleet Admiral&quot;.   He does NOT say &quot;when I took command of the Enterprise&quot;.

In contemporary navies, I don&#039;t know it is more usual or UNunusual that one Captain directly relieves his predecessor.  But if it is MORE usual, then we may be able to infer another Captain commanding the Enterprise between Pike and Kirk.  That of course is pure speculation, not directly borne out by any onscreen dialogue, etc.  It also has nor particular bearing on the case of Captain April.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>93. Closettrekker &#8211; &#8220;The only Captains of the original NCC-1701 referenced or depicted in live action Trek are Pike, Kirk, Decker, and Spock.&#8221;</p>
<p>Quite correct.  But there&#8217;s one thing in The Menagerie that has always left me wondering.  If I recallthe dialogue correctly Kirk mentions that he met Pike when Pike was &#8220;promoted to Fleet Admiral&#8221;.   He does NOT say &#8220;when I took command of the Enterprise&#8221;.</p>
<p>In contemporary navies, I don&#8217;t know it is more usual or UNunusual that one Captain directly relieves his predecessor.  But if it is MORE usual, then we may be able to infer another Captain commanding the Enterprise between Pike and Kirk.  That of course is pure speculation, not directly borne out by any onscreen dialogue, etc.  It also has nor particular bearing on the case of Captain April.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Closettrekker</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/06/22/st09-tidbits-weekend-box-office-interview-bits-from-pine-abrams-nimoy-kurtzman/comment-page-2/#comment-1944246</link>
		<dc:creator>Closettrekker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=4959#comment-1944246</guid>
		<description>#95----It&#039;s actually an area where stories could be told which would be common to both the &quot;prime&quot; and altered timelines, since the events described would occur prior to 2233.

I would read something like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#95&#8212;-It&#8217;s actually an area where stories could be told which would be common to both the &#8220;prime&#8221; and altered timelines, since the events described would occur prior to 2233.</p>
<p>I would read something like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/06/22/st09-tidbits-weekend-box-office-interview-bits-from-pine-abrams-nimoy-kurtzman/comment-page-2/#comment-1944181</link>
		<dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=4959#comment-1944181</guid>
		<description>I actually saw this movie for the fourth time, and the first time since the first week.   I was planning on waiting for the Blu-Ray but it was hot on Friday afternoon, and I figured that the movie theater would be a good place to spend it.

I agree with the idea for a George Kirk movie - also with Winona Kirk and Capt Robau.  I sort of thought that if Pike did his paper on George Kirk, then there has to be a little more backstory to him.

I think that if Paramount was on their toes fully, then when I go to see Transformers 2 tomorrow, then there should be an attached trailer for Trek which touts the critcal acclaim and points out that it is the same writers as Transformers and Transformers 2.  There will be a lot of people seeing Transformers which haven&#039;t seen Trek and it would be a good time to hit them up to see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually saw this movie for the fourth time, and the first time since the first week.   I was planning on waiting for the Blu-Ray but it was hot on Friday afternoon, and I figured that the movie theater would be a good place to spend it.</p>
<p>I agree with the idea for a George Kirk movie &#8211; also with Winona Kirk and Capt Robau.  I sort of thought that if Pike did his paper on George Kirk, then there has to be a little more backstory to him.</p>
<p>I think that if Paramount was on their toes fully, then when I go to see Transformers 2 tomorrow, then there should be an attached trailer for Trek which touts the critcal acclaim and points out that it is the same writers as Transformers and Transformers 2.  There will be a lot of people seeing Transformers which haven&#8217;t seen Trek and it would be a good time to hit them up to see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

