


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TJ Hooker Movie Update: Shatner Says It&#8217;s Time For Him To Be &#8216;Father Hooker&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2009/07/14/tj-hooker-movie-update-shatner-says-its-time-for-him-to-be-father-hooker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/07/14/tj-hooker-movie-update-shatner-says-its-time-for-him-to-be-father-hooker/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:08:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: engon</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/07/14/tj-hooker-movie-update-shatner-says-its-time-for-him-to-be-father-hooker/comment-page-3/#comment-2050227</link>
		<dc:creator>engon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=5799#comment-2050227</guid>
		<description>I would like to see Chris Pine is a re-make of the 1973 classic, &quot;IMPULSE.&quot;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7EIL1AhN2Q</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see Chris Pine is a re-make of the 1973 classic, &#8220;IMPULSE.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7EIL1AhN2Q" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7EIL1AhN2Q</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/07/14/tj-hooker-movie-update-shatner-says-its-time-for-him-to-be-father-hooker/comment-page-3/#comment-2049497</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=5799#comment-2049497</guid>
		<description>#134. – not if they do an origin story of Hooker. Remember until recently Kirk was an energetic 35+ year old guy with a gut and a speech impediment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#134. – not if they do an origin story of Hooker. Remember until recently Kirk was an energetic 35+ year old guy with a gut and a speech impediment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magic_Al</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/07/14/tj-hooker-movie-update-shatner-says-its-time-for-him-to-be-father-hooker/comment-page-3/#comment-2046487</link>
		<dc:creator>Magic_Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 21:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=5799#comment-2046487</guid>
		<description>Chris Pine is NOT an all-purpose Shatner replacement. Chris Pine is not T.J. Hooker. Chris Pine is not Denny Crane.

T.J. Hooker is an energetic 50-year-old guy, who looks like he thinks he looks a lot younger. There are actors who fit that description but not Chris Pine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Pine is NOT an all-purpose Shatner replacement. Chris Pine is not T.J. Hooker. Chris Pine is not Denny Crane.</p>
<p>T.J. Hooker is an energetic 50-year-old guy, who looks like he thinks he looks a lot younger. There are actors who fit that description but not Chris Pine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Closettrekker</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/07/14/tj-hooker-movie-update-shatner-says-its-time-for-him-to-be-father-hooker/comment-page-3/#comment-2045793</link>
		<dc:creator>Closettrekker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=5799#comment-2045793</guid>
		<description>&quot;...then again, I would not have thought some transforming toys incorporated into an insipid plot would out-gross some of the biggest and most revered franchises of all time either.&quot;

Isn&#039;t that the truth?

It&#039;s as if Michael Bay said to us all, &quot;If you think I&#039;ve blown stuff up before---what until you see what I&#039;ve done now.&quot;

My boys can&#039;t get enough of that sort of thing, and their demographic always seems to speak the loudest at the box office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;then again, I would not have thought some transforming toys incorporated into an insipid plot would out-gross some of the biggest and most revered franchises of all time either.&#8221;</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t that the truth?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s as if Michael Bay said to us all, &#8220;If you think I&#8217;ve blown stuff up before&#8212;what until you see what I&#8217;ve done now.&#8221;</p>
<p>My boys can&#8217;t get enough of that sort of thing, and their demographic always seems to speak the loudest at the box office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/07/14/tj-hooker-movie-update-shatner-says-its-time-for-him-to-be-father-hooker/comment-page-3/#comment-2042783</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=5799#comment-2042783</guid>
		<description>#131 – I don&#039;t debate Trek&#039;s relative historical popularity at all. As for what I said was &quot;there is no accounting for taste&quot;. Hooker did better than Trek did during its run. I did not qualify it further. Obviously what I think of Hooker and Trek and what the majority of Neisen families thought of them are completely different. In the end, the only point I was trying to make was this:

popularity=what have you done lately

One can say &quot;Star Trek&quot; IS more popular, but that can all change overnight, by any estimation.

I seriously doubt Hooker could spin off a whole new franchise that would compete with Star Trek on any level, then again, I would not have thought some transforming toys incorporated into an insipid plot would out-gross some of the biggest and most revered franchises of all time either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#131 – I don&#8217;t debate Trek&#8217;s relative historical popularity at all. As for what I said was &#8220;there is no accounting for taste&#8221;. Hooker did better than Trek did during its run. I did not qualify it further. Obviously what I think of Hooker and Trek and what the majority of Neisen families thought of them are completely different. In the end, the only point I was trying to make was this:</p>
<p>popularity=what have you done lately</p>
<p>One can say &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; IS more popular, but that can all change overnight, by any estimation.</p>
<p>I seriously doubt Hooker could spin off a whole new franchise that would compete with Star Trek on any level, then again, I would not have thought some transforming toys incorporated into an insipid plot would out-gross some of the biggest and most revered franchises of all time either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Closettrekker</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/07/14/tj-hooker-movie-update-shatner-says-its-time-for-him-to-be-father-hooker/comment-page-3/#comment-2042683</link>
		<dc:creator>Closettrekker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=5799#comment-2042683</guid>
		<description>#129---&quot; Who said that?&quot;

Well, if your question is really &#039;who suggested that there was a chance that TJ Hooker was more popular than Kirk?&#039; , then the answer is: you did, as I understood it.

I realize that I actually typed &quot;Star Trek&quot; instead of &quot;Kirk&quot; by mistake, but the reply was meant to be to post #122.

Your contention was that a question exists as to whether TJ Hooker is more popular than Kirk, and then went on to cite the run and comparative popularity of Hooker vs. Trek as the basis for such a question.

(from post #122)
&quot;The REAL question is, which is more popular, Kirk or Hooker? Only the box office can decide that.&quot;

If you think it is as ridiculous a suggestion as I do, then why would it be a question at all----much less the &quot;real&quot; question?lol 

&quot;If it beats Star Trek’s B.O. (by some fluke), then there’s your popularity.&quot;

Even then, I wouldn&#039;t concede that.

That would suggest only that the two individual films&#039; popularity would be in favor of the TJ Hooker comedy----not that the two characters of Hooker and Kirk would necessarily favor the former.

&quot;...prior to 6 months ago, Star Trek wasn’t very popular...either.&quot; 


 I think that would be discounting staying power and cultural icon status.

Star Trek featuring Kirk has spanned 79 epsiodes and 8 feature films, as well as spawning 4 live action spinoffs, 22 animated episodes, about a thousand books, and 3 other spinoff films---all over a period of more than 43 years (all of which have seen the original 79 episodes in successful syndication).

TJ Hooker lasted for three seasons in prime time on ABC, one on late night CBS (for a grand total of less than 90 hours of mid-80&#039;s television), and a few years in syndication (of which there has been none at all in the last 4 years, and prior to 2005, very little at all).

It&#039;s not even close. This movie could have to do TDK-type numbers and I still wouldn&#039;t consider the prospect of that character being more popular than Kirk.

To stick with your example scenario, what that would mean to me is that Will Smith is simply more popular than Pine---and that&#039;s hardly the same thing as saying that TJ Hooker is more popular than Kirk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#129&#8212;&#8221; Who said that?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, if your question is really &#8216;who suggested that there was a chance that TJ Hooker was more popular than Kirk?&#8217; , then the answer is: you did, as I understood it.</p>
<p>I realize that I actually typed &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; instead of &#8220;Kirk&#8221; by mistake, but the reply was meant to be to post #122.</p>
<p>Your contention was that a question exists as to whether TJ Hooker is more popular than Kirk, and then went on to cite the run and comparative popularity of Hooker vs. Trek as the basis for such a question.</p>
<p>(from post #122)<br />
&#8220;The REAL question is, which is more popular, Kirk or Hooker? Only the box office can decide that.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you think it is as ridiculous a suggestion as I do, then why would it be a question at all&#8212;-much less the &#8220;real&#8221; question?lol </p>
<p>&#8220;If it beats Star Trek’s B.O. (by some fluke), then there’s your popularity.&#8221;</p>
<p>Even then, I wouldn&#8217;t concede that.</p>
<p>That would suggest only that the two individual films&#8217; popularity would be in favor of the TJ Hooker comedy&#8212;-not that the two characters of Hooker and Kirk would necessarily favor the former.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;prior to 6 months ago, Star Trek wasn’t very popular&#8230;either.&#8221; </p>
<p> I think that would be discounting staying power and cultural icon status.</p>
<p>Star Trek featuring Kirk has spanned 79 epsiodes and 8 feature films, as well as spawning 4 live action spinoffs, 22 animated episodes, about a thousand books, and 3 other spinoff films&#8212;all over a period of more than 43 years (all of which have seen the original 79 episodes in successful syndication).</p>
<p>TJ Hooker lasted for three seasons in prime time on ABC, one on late night CBS (for a grand total of less than 90 hours of mid-80&#8217;s television), and a few years in syndication (of which there has been none at all in the last 4 years, and prior to 2005, very little at all).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not even close. This movie could have to do TDK-type numbers and I still wouldn&#8217;t consider the prospect of that character being more popular than Kirk.</p>
<p>To stick with your example scenario, what that would mean to me is that Will Smith is simply more popular than Pine&#8212;and that&#8217;s hardly the same thing as saying that TJ Hooker is more popular than Kirk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Ballz</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/07/14/tj-hooker-movie-update-shatner-says-its-time-for-him-to-be-father-hooker/comment-page-3/#comment-2042620</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Ballz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=5799#comment-2042620</guid>
		<description>Stick in a nude scene with Heather Locklear (playing soccer with them) and you&#039;ve got box-office gold!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stick in a nude scene with Heather Locklear (playing soccer with them) and you&#8217;ve got box-office gold!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/07/14/tj-hooker-movie-update-shatner-says-its-time-for-him-to-be-father-hooker/comment-page-3/#comment-2042578</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=5799#comment-2042578</guid>
		<description>123. Closettrekker wrote:&lt;i&gt;&quot;I think it is ridiculous to suggest that there is even a chance that ‘TJ Hooker’ is more popular than ‘Star Trek’.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

I do too. Who said that?

But if box office is all that&#039;s required for success, here&#039;s a scenario:

If almost every Star Trek fan (at least the TOS ones) go see a T.J. Hooker film just to see William Shatner in it, that gets them a solid box office foundation right there.

Then, they cast a big star (Will Smith?) who will also attract a certain amount of box office, give Heather Lockleer a cameo, plus add the original fans of Hooker who were neither Trek fans nor Shatner fans and there&#039;s your success. 

If it beats Star Trek&#039;s B.O. (by some fluke), then there&#039;s your popularity.

It&#039;s all perception. As of right now? No, by all empirical evidence Hooker is not currently as popular as Trek. But prior to 6 months ago, Star Trek wasn&#039;t very popular since Enterprise either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>123. Closettrekker wrote:<i>&#8220;I think it is ridiculous to suggest that there is even a chance that ‘TJ Hooker’ is more popular than ‘Star Trek’.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>I do too. Who said that?</p>
<p>But if box office is all that&#8217;s required for success, here&#8217;s a scenario:</p>
<p>If almost every Star Trek fan (at least the TOS ones) go see a T.J. Hooker film just to see William Shatner in it, that gets them a solid box office foundation right there.</p>
<p>Then, they cast a big star (Will Smith?) who will also attract a certain amount of box office, give Heather Lockleer a cameo, plus add the original fans of Hooker who were neither Trek fans nor Shatner fans and there&#8217;s your success. </p>
<p>If it beats Star Trek&#8217;s B.O. (by some fluke), then there&#8217;s your popularity.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all perception. As of right now? No, by all empirical evidence Hooker is not currently as popular as Trek. But prior to 6 months ago, Star Trek wasn&#8217;t very popular since Enterprise either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Closettrekker</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/07/14/tj-hooker-movie-update-shatner-says-its-time-for-him-to-be-father-hooker/comment-page-3/#comment-2042411</link>
		<dc:creator>Closettrekker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=5799#comment-2042411</guid>
		<description>How about a Star Trek/Boston Legal/TJ Hooker crossover?

Abrams can re-imagine &quot;Court-Martial&quot;, and Denny Crane can take the place of Samuel T. Cogley in defending Kirk...and sometime during the confrontation between Kirk and the villain, said villain could attempt to escape in a shuttle----and both Kirk and Denny Crane could jump on the hood of the shuttle while Quinto and Heather Locklear (who sleeps with both Kirk and Crane along the way) try to prevent the bay doors from opening.

I&#039;m telling you...that&#039;s box office gold!!! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a Star Trek/Boston Legal/TJ Hooker crossover?</p>
<p>Abrams can re-imagine &#8220;Court-Martial&#8221;, and Denny Crane can take the place of Samuel T. Cogley in defending Kirk&#8230;and sometime during the confrontation between Kirk and the villain, said villain could attempt to escape in a shuttle&#8212;-and both Kirk and Denny Crane could jump on the hood of the shuttle while Quinto and Heather Locklear (who sleeps with both Kirk and Crane along the way) try to prevent the bay doors from opening.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m telling you&#8230;that&#8217;s box office gold!!! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Ballz</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/07/14/tj-hooker-movie-update-shatner-says-its-time-for-him-to-be-father-hooker/comment-page-3/#comment-2042358</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Ballz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=5799#comment-2042358</guid>
		<description>Shatner_Fan_Prime

okay, sarcasm doesn&#039;t work! I&#039;ll have to see if you&#039;ll nibble at something more subtle! :&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shatner_Fan_Prime</p>
<p>okay, sarcasm doesn&#8217;t work! I&#8217;ll have to see if you&#8217;ll nibble at something more subtle! :&gt;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

