


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TrekInk: Review of Star Trek Mission&#8217;s End #5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2009/07/30/trekink-review-star-trek-missions-end-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/07/30/trekink-review-star-trek-missions-end-5/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 03:06:28 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: StarFuryG7</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/07/30/trekink-review-star-trek-missions-end-5/comment-page-1/#comment-2091380</link>
		<dc:creator>StarFuryG7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 00:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=6339#comment-2091380</guid>
		<description>&quot;#18–part of the multiverse theory implies that its not just events that can be different, but peoples’ appearances too…the 1990s FOX/SciFi show Sliders dealt with this by having alternate versions of a main character played by another actor (in other words one who looked different from the original) and even a FEMALE version of a male main character, so the disparity created by Nimoy playing Elder Spock to Quinto’s younger Spock, or by the rest of the new cast playing roles once played by others, doesn’t exist.&quot; -Porthos X

That&#039;s not the issue --in fact, I didn&#039;t even touch on appearance as an issue. I&#039;m concerned with the integrity of the timeline and how the original timeline has been affected and altered by this new one, which clearly changes everything.

&quot;also…it IS a NEW timeline that’s SIMILAR but not THE SAME as TOS…&quot;

That&#039;s the problem actually.

&quot;as for Spock’s actions…see how youd react if you were inadvertently responsible for the deaths of over 6 billion Romulans and over 6 billion of your own people and your own mother and Kirk’s father in an alternate timeline…&quot;

Spock was not &quot;responsible&quot; for all that --he was doing all that he possibly could to rectify the situation when he simply ran out of time. And what canon shows is that when a problem in the timeline like that one emerged, the answer was to go back in time to correct the timeline, such as in &quot;City on the Edge of Forever,&quot; and ST IV: TVH, which was a little different in that they went back in time there to retrieve whales, which had gone extinct by the 23rd century --but if he could go back to the 20th century to retrieve two humpback whales, one would think that saving Romulus and thereby preventing the events that unfolded in this film from happening would have been just as important, if not more so.

&quot;Vulcan logic and discipline were not designed to be adequate to deal with the guilt and trauma of being accidentally responsible for the deaths of over 12 billion people…moreover he felt since he was there already he had a responsibility to the people of the new timeline…&quot;

Spock&#039;s responsibility when it came to maintaining the integrity of a timeline was always in seeing to it that history unfolded correctly, in addition to his lives of his fellow comrades and those closest to him --in other words, the crew of the Enterprise and what would happen to them also.

&quot;so dont presume that Prime Spock’s actions were out of character as you dont have suffjcient information to form an accurate argument…&quot;

Sure I do --I know the storyline to this latest movie, where it starts and where it ends, and I just gave you an argument that holds solidly true to the character, whereas what happens in this film doesn’t by the end of the movie and is simply inconsistent with who Spock was and what he believed, regardless of what stage of his life is at issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;#18–part of the multiverse theory implies that its not just events that can be different, but peoples’ appearances too…the 1990s FOX/SciFi show Sliders dealt with this by having alternate versions of a main character played by another actor (in other words one who looked different from the original) and even a FEMALE version of a male main character, so the disparity created by Nimoy playing Elder Spock to Quinto’s younger Spock, or by the rest of the new cast playing roles once played by others, doesn’t exist.&#8221; -Porthos X</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not the issue &#8211;in fact, I didn&#8217;t even touch on appearance as an issue. I&#8217;m concerned with the integrity of the timeline and how the original timeline has been affected and altered by this new one, which clearly changes everything.</p>
<p>&#8220;also…it IS a NEW timeline that’s SIMILAR but not THE SAME as TOS…&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the problem actually.</p>
<p>&#8220;as for Spock’s actions…see how youd react if you were inadvertently responsible for the deaths of over 6 billion Romulans and over 6 billion of your own people and your own mother and Kirk’s father in an alternate timeline…&#8221;</p>
<p>Spock was not &#8220;responsible&#8221; for all that &#8211;he was doing all that he possibly could to rectify the situation when he simply ran out of time. And what canon shows is that when a problem in the timeline like that one emerged, the answer was to go back in time to correct the timeline, such as in &#8220;City on the Edge of Forever,&#8221; and ST IV: TVH, which was a little different in that they went back in time there to retrieve whales, which had gone extinct by the 23rd century &#8211;but if he could go back to the 20th century to retrieve two humpback whales, one would think that saving Romulus and thereby preventing the events that unfolded in this film from happening would have been just as important, if not more so.</p>
<p>&#8220;Vulcan logic and discipline were not designed to be adequate to deal with the guilt and trauma of being accidentally responsible for the deaths of over 12 billion people…moreover he felt since he was there already he had a responsibility to the people of the new timeline…&#8221;</p>
<p>Spock&#8217;s responsibility when it came to maintaining the integrity of a timeline was always in seeing to it that history unfolded correctly, in addition to his lives of his fellow comrades and those closest to him &#8211;in other words, the crew of the Enterprise and what would happen to them also.</p>
<p>&#8220;so dont presume that Prime Spock’s actions were out of character as you dont have suffjcient information to form an accurate argument…&#8221;</p>
<p>Sure I do &#8211;I know the storyline to this latest movie, where it starts and where it ends, and I just gave you an argument that holds solidly true to the character, whereas what happens in this film doesn’t by the end of the movie and is simply inconsistent with who Spock was and what he believed, regardless of what stage of his life is at issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StarFuryG7</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/07/30/trekink-review-star-trek-missions-end-5/comment-page-1/#comment-2091372</link>
		<dc:creator>StarFuryG7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 00:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=6339#comment-2091372</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;#18–part of the multiverse theory implies that its not just events that can be different, but peoples’ appearances too…the 1990s FOX/SciFi show Sliders dealt with this by having alternate versions of a main character played by another actor (in other words one who looked different from the original) and even a FEMALE version of a male main character, so the disparity created by Nimoy playing Elder Spock to Quinto’s younger Spock, or by the rest of the new cast playing roles once played by others, doesn’t exist.&quot;&lt;&gt;&quot;also…it IS a NEW timeline that’s SIMILAR but not THE SAME as TOS…&quot;&lt;&gt;&quot;as for Spock’s actions…see how youd react if you were inadvertently responsible for the deaths of over 6 billion Romulans and over 6 billion of your own people and your own mother and Kirk’s father in an alternate timeline…&quot;&lt;&gt;&quot;Vulcan logic and discipline were not designed to be adequate to deal with the guilt and trauma of being accidentally responsible for the deaths of over 12 billion people…moreover he felt since he was there already he had a responsibility to the people of the new timeline…&quot;&lt;&gt;&quot;so dont presume that Prime Spock’s actions were out of character as you dont have suffjcient information to form an accurate argument…&quot;&lt;&lt;

Sure I do --I know the storyline to this latest movie, where it starts and where it ends, and I just gave you an argument that holds solidly true to the character, whereas what happens in this film doesn’t by the end of the movie and is simply inconsistent with who Spock was and what he believed, regardless of what stage of his life is at issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;#18–part of the multiverse theory implies that its not just events that can be different, but peoples’ appearances too…the 1990s FOX/SciFi show Sliders dealt with this by having alternate versions of a main character played by another actor (in other words one who looked different from the original) and even a FEMALE version of a male main character, so the disparity created by Nimoy playing Elder Spock to Quinto’s younger Spock, or by the rest of the new cast playing roles once played by others, doesn’t exist.&#8221;&lt;&gt;&#8221;also…it IS a NEW timeline that’s SIMILAR but not THE SAME as TOS…&#8221;&lt;&gt;&#8221;as for Spock’s actions…see how youd react if you were inadvertently responsible for the deaths of over 6 billion Romulans and over 6 billion of your own people and your own mother and Kirk’s father in an alternate timeline…&#8221;&lt;&gt;&#8221;Vulcan logic and discipline were not designed to be adequate to deal with the guilt and trauma of being accidentally responsible for the deaths of over 12 billion people…moreover he felt since he was there already he had a responsibility to the people of the new timeline…&#8221;&lt;&gt;&#8221;so dont presume that Prime Spock’s actions were out of character as you dont have suffjcient information to form an accurate argument…&#8221;&lt;&lt;</p>
<p>Sure I do &#8211;I know the storyline to this latest movie, where it starts and where it ends, and I just gave you an argument that holds solidly true to the character, whereas what happens in this film doesn’t by the end of the movie and is simply inconsistent with who Spock was and what he believed, regardless of what stage of his life is at issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Porthos X</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/07/30/trekink-review-star-trek-missions-end-5/comment-page-1/#comment-2090779</link>
		<dc:creator>Porthos X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 17:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=6339#comment-2090779</guid>
		<description>#18--part of the multiverse theory implies that its not just events that can be different, but peoples&#039; appearances too...the 1990s FOX/SciFi show Sliders dealt with this by having alternate versions of a main character played by another actor (in other words one who looked different from the original) and even a FEMALE version of a male main character, so the disparity created by Nimoy playing Elder Spock to Quinto&#039;s younger Spock, or by the rest of the new cast playing roles once played by others, doesn&#039;t exist...also...it IS a NEW timeline that&#039;s SIMILAR but not THE SAME as TOS... as for Spock&#039;s actions...see how youd react if you were inadvertently responsible for the deaths of over 6 billion Romulans and over 6 billion of your own people and your own mother and Kirk&#039;s father in an alternate timeline...after all Spock is half-human too, and hadnt had enough time to recover emotionally from the devastation...Vulcan logic and discipline were not designed to be adequate to deal with the guilt and trauma of being accidentally responsible for the deaths of over 12 billion people...moreover he felt since he was there already he had a responsibility to the people of the new timeline...AND we&#039;re dealing with a much older, different Prime Spock than in the TOS films OR in Unification... one further burdened by the death of Prime Kirk at Veridian 3, the devastation of the Dominion War, the Borg Disaster in the relaunch novels, and who knows what else... so dont presume that Prime Spock&#039;s actions were out of character as you dont have suffjcient information to form an accurate argument...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#18&#8211;part of the multiverse theory implies that its not just events that can be different, but peoples&#8217; appearances too&#8230;the 1990s FOX/SciFi show Sliders dealt with this by having alternate versions of a main character played by another actor (in other words one who looked different from the original) and even a FEMALE version of a male main character, so the disparity created by Nimoy playing Elder Spock to Quinto&#8217;s younger Spock, or by the rest of the new cast playing roles once played by others, doesn&#8217;t exist&#8230;also&#8230;it IS a NEW timeline that&#8217;s SIMILAR but not THE SAME as TOS&#8230; as for Spock&#8217;s actions&#8230;see how youd react if you were inadvertently responsible for the deaths of over 6 billion Romulans and over 6 billion of your own people and your own mother and Kirk&#8217;s father in an alternate timeline&#8230;after all Spock is half-human too, and hadnt had enough time to recover emotionally from the devastation&#8230;Vulcan logic and discipline were not designed to be adequate to deal with the guilt and trauma of being accidentally responsible for the deaths of over 12 billion people&#8230;moreover he felt since he was there already he had a responsibility to the people of the new timeline&#8230;AND we&#8217;re dealing with a much older, different Prime Spock than in the TOS films OR in Unification&#8230; one further burdened by the death of Prime Kirk at Veridian 3, the devastation of the Dominion War, the Borg Disaster in the relaunch novels, and who knows what else&#8230; so dont presume that Prime Spock&#8217;s actions were out of character as you dont have suffjcient information to form an accurate argument&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBigCW</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/07/30/trekink-review-star-trek-missions-end-5/comment-page-1/#comment-2090391</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBigCW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 08:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=6339#comment-2090391</guid>
		<description>What is this - the 3rd or 4th comic version of the end of the first 5YM?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is this &#8211; the 3rd or 4th comic version of the end of the first 5YM?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: screaming satellite</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/07/30/trekink-review-star-trek-missions-end-5/comment-page-1/#comment-2088623</link>
		<dc:creator>screaming satellite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 12:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=6339#comment-2088623</guid>
		<description>I prefer DCs annual 2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer DCs annual 2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wkiryn</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/07/30/trekink-review-star-trek-missions-end-5/comment-page-1/#comment-2087716</link>
		<dc:creator>wkiryn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 23:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=6339#comment-2087716</guid>
		<description>In a perfect universe a new trek friendly reboot series would go out of its way to unestablish BermanBragaisms - Cochrane is from Alpha Centauri, Enterprise doesn&#039;t exist etc.  And then undo the orciverse - romulan empire is just fine - rumors that spock is in some other dimension is akin to Elvis sightings.   

A friend of mine was talking up how much better the movie was than &quot;that show that doesn&#039;t exist&quot; (enterprise).  Sadly I pointed out that in the movie continuity Enterprise is the only show that counts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a perfect universe a new trek friendly reboot series would go out of its way to unestablish BermanBragaisms &#8211; Cochrane is from Alpha Centauri, Enterprise doesn&#8217;t exist etc.  And then undo the orciverse &#8211; romulan empire is just fine &#8211; rumors that spock is in some other dimension is akin to Elvis sightings.   </p>
<p>A friend of mine was talking up how much better the movie was than &#8220;that show that doesn&#8217;t exist&#8221; (enterprise).  Sadly I pointed out that in the movie continuity Enterprise is the only show that counts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StarFuryG7</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/07/30/trekink-review-star-trek-missions-end-5/comment-page-1/#comment-2087297</link>
		<dc:creator>StarFuryG7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=6339#comment-2087297</guid>
		<description>I think the fact that they chose to include Nimoy in this movie as elder Spock makes it more difficult to just write off the change in the timeline as just &#039;a different or alternative version of ST&#039; with the original timeline supposedly remaining intact, aside from his actions in the film being out of character given that he accepted the outcome by the end of the movie rather than feeling it necessary to travel back in time to correct the timeline. 

As for this notion about a new universe having &#039;split off&#039; and being created when Nero and Spock went through the black hole --I&#039;ve already pondered that prospect elsewhere but deemed it highly unlikely. Their having gone back to an already existing alternate timeline with subtle differences in its history would be far more likely, all things considered.

I realize some people may consider this a silly thing to get all hung up on ...I did notice that someone here mentioned their chalking it up to being just &#039;a different version of Trek&#039; altogether, which it obviously is, but then it would have probably been better if they didn&#039;t include Nimoy at all to give a solid sense of continuity and a real connection to the original series and its characters. Frankly, I&#039;m peeved by the extent to which Orci, Kurtzman and Abrams want to just skate with this without making a solid definitive statement clearly addressing the problem head on, because it&#039;s a serious issue to longtime fans like myself. &quot;The original timeline remains intact even though this one obviously overwrites it.&quot;

Give me a break. That&#039;s just taking the fan base for granted IMHO, and it&#039;s really no better than a lot of the stunts Berman and Braga pulled when thumbing their noses at Trek fans, especially at fans of the original series, which arguably they took the most for granted during their time running the franchise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the fact that they chose to include Nimoy in this movie as elder Spock makes it more difficult to just write off the change in the timeline as just &#8216;a different or alternative version of ST&#8217; with the original timeline supposedly remaining intact, aside from his actions in the film being out of character given that he accepted the outcome by the end of the movie rather than feeling it necessary to travel back in time to correct the timeline. </p>
<p>As for this notion about a new universe having &#8217;split off&#8217; and being created when Nero and Spock went through the black hole &#8211;I&#8217;ve already pondered that prospect elsewhere but deemed it highly unlikely. Their having gone back to an already existing alternate timeline with subtle differences in its history would be far more likely, all things considered.</p>
<p>I realize some people may consider this a silly thing to get all hung up on &#8230;I did notice that someone here mentioned their chalking it up to being just &#8216;a different version of Trek&#8217; altogether, which it obviously is, but then it would have probably been better if they didn&#8217;t include Nimoy at all to give a solid sense of continuity and a real connection to the original series and its characters. Frankly, I&#8217;m peeved by the extent to which Orci, Kurtzman and Abrams want to just skate with this without making a solid definitive statement clearly addressing the problem head on, because it&#8217;s a serious issue to longtime fans like myself. &#8220;The original timeline remains intact even though this one obviously overwrites it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Give me a break. That&#8217;s just taking the fan base for granted IMHO, and it&#8217;s really no better than a lot of the stunts Berman and Braga pulled when thumbing their noses at Trek fans, especially at fans of the original series, which arguably they took the most for granted during their time running the franchise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill hiro</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/07/30/trekink-review-star-trek-missions-end-5/comment-page-1/#comment-2086890</link>
		<dc:creator>bill hiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=6339#comment-2086890</guid>
		<description>I thought the art was great but as an attempt to tell a story about the &quot;final mission&quot; of the 5 year voyage, having the running thread being giant talking bug people that the original show couldn&#039;t have pulled off on TV does take me out of the story a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the art was great but as an attempt to tell a story about the &#8220;final mission&#8221; of the 5 year voyage, having the running thread being giant talking bug people that the original show couldn&#8217;t have pulled off on TV does take me out of the story a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XMind</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/07/30/trekink-review-star-trek-missions-end-5/comment-page-1/#comment-2086794</link>
		<dc:creator>XMind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=6339#comment-2086794</guid>
		<description>The art is excellent!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The art is excellent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Prewitt</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/07/30/trekink-review-star-trek-missions-end-5/comment-page-1/#comment-2086769</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Prewitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=6339#comment-2086769</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t get into the art on this series.  As far as story, I also really liked the &quot;Final Mission&quot; written by Mike W. Barr referenced by 13.  That was a satisfying yarn!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t get into the art on this series.  As far as story, I also really liked the &#8220;Final Mission&#8221; written by Mike W. Barr referenced by 13.  That was a satisfying yarn!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

