


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Trek Turns 43</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2009/09/08/star-trek-turns-43/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/09/08/star-trek-turns-43/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:49:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Queen Traphagen</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/09/08/star-trek-turns-43/comment-page-4/#comment-3384041</link>
		<dc:creator>Queen Traphagen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=7316#comment-3384041</guid>
		<description>Hey! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a collection of volunteers and starting a new initiative in a community in the same niche. Your blog provided us beneficial information to work on. You have done a outstanding job!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a collection of volunteers and starting a new initiative in a community in the same niche. Your blog provided us beneficial information to work on. You have done a outstanding job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danita Laureano</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/09/08/star-trek-turns-43/comment-page-4/#comment-3384027</link>
		<dc:creator>Danita Laureano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=7316#comment-3384027</guid>
		<description>Interesting blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere? A design like yours with a few simple tweeks would really make my blog jump out. Please let me know where you got your design. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere? A design like yours with a few simple tweeks would really make my blog jump out. Please let me know where you got your design. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mens silver bracelets</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/09/08/star-trek-turns-43/comment-page-4/#comment-3066635</link>
		<dc:creator>mens silver bracelets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 19:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=7316#comment-3066635</guid>
		<description>Donald Semone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald Semone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lace wigs</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/09/08/star-trek-turns-43/comment-page-4/#comment-2809383</link>
		<dc:creator>lace wigs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 02:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=7316#comment-2809383</guid>
		<description>Thank your for your articles. I learn more from here!Great blog, and thanks for the insight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank your for your articles. I learn more from here!Great blog, and thanks for the insight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dovile</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/09/08/star-trek-turns-43/comment-page-4/#comment-2196001</link>
		<dc:creator>Dovile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 06:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=7316#comment-2196001</guid>
		<description>Long live Star Trek !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long live Star Trek !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hat Rick</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/09/08/star-trek-turns-43/comment-page-4/#comment-2193963</link>
		<dc:creator>Hat Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=7316#comment-2193963</guid>
		<description>Happy Birthday, Star Trek!

43 is the new 23.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy Birthday, Star Trek!</p>
<p>43 is the new 23.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Go Spock!</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/09/08/star-trek-turns-43/comment-page-4/#comment-2193895</link>
		<dc:creator>Go Spock!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=7316#comment-2193895</guid>
		<description>Happy 43rd Birthday, Star Trek!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy 43rd Birthday, Star Trek!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Son of a Maui Portagee</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/09/08/star-trek-turns-43/comment-page-4/#comment-2192835</link>
		<dc:creator>Son of a Maui Portagee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=7316#comment-2192835</guid>
		<description>#139.,

Also, this isn&#039;t much but an opinion by the Honorable John Zebrowski in the case of Roddenberry versus Roddenberry,

http://www.thefreelibrary.com/-a083956576

includes,

&quot;&quot;In Norway&#039;s contract with the Star Trek 1 production company, the term
&quot;profit participation&quot; captioned a section defining Norway&#039;s rights to profits from
syndications. The contract provided that Star Trek 1 had to repay a large and growing production cost deficit before any syndication profits would be payable to Norway.&quot;&quot;

which indicates the show amassed a growing production deficit of around $5 million dollars before syndication.

It&#039;s not direct evidence but it is consistent with the part of my recollection that the production owed NBC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#139.,</p>
<p>Also, this isn&#8217;t much but an opinion by the Honorable John Zebrowski in the case of Roddenberry versus Roddenberry,</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefreelibrary.com/-a083956576" rel="nofollow">http://www.thefreelibrary.com/-a083956576</a></p>
<p>includes,</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;In Norway&#8217;s contract with the Star Trek 1 production company, the term<br />
&#8220;profit participation&#8221; captioned a section defining Norway&#8217;s rights to profits from<br />
syndications. The contract provided that Star Trek 1 had to repay a large and growing production cost deficit before any syndication profits would be payable to Norway.&#8221;"</p>
<p>which indicates the show amassed a growing production deficit of around $5 million dollars before syndication.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not direct evidence but it is consistent with the part of my recollection that the production owed NBC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Son of a Maui Portagee</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/09/08/star-trek-turns-43/comment-page-4/#comment-2192830</link>
		<dc:creator>Son of a Maui Portagee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=7316#comment-2192830</guid>
		<description>#139.,

I think the quote in #158 sourced,

http://preview.tinyurl.com/m3rkgv

more than those isolated images with no identifying marks or dates from the source publication in your cite, makes a stronger support for your time frame.

And the 6pm airing means that the NBC kerfuffle that I recall must have been on a much more accelerated time frame than the years since have caused me to erroneously believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#139.,</p>
<p>I think the quote in #158 sourced,</p>
<p><a href="http://preview.tinyurl.com/m3rkgv" rel="nofollow">http://preview.tinyurl.com/m3rkgv</a></p>
<p>more than those isolated images with no identifying marks or dates from the source publication in your cite, makes a stronger support for your time frame.</p>
<p>And the 6pm airing means that the NBC kerfuffle that I recall must have been on a much more accelerated time frame than the years since have caused me to erroneously believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Son of a Maui Portagee</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/09/08/star-trek-turns-43/comment-page-4/#comment-2192815</link>
		<dc:creator>Son of a Maui Portagee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=7316#comment-2192815</guid>
		<description>#139.,

&quot;Channel 13 also has secured the first off-showings of Star Trek, air nightly at 6 o clock. Ironically, this is the best time slot the former NBC vehicle&quot; - LOS ANGELES TIMES, August 25, 1969</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#139.,</p>
<p>&#8220;Channel 13 also has secured the first off-showings of Star Trek, air nightly at 6 o clock. Ironically, this is the best time slot the former NBC vehicle&#8221; &#8211; LOS ANGELES TIMES, August 25, 1969</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

