


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Trek Takes Home Top Spike Scream Awards &#8211; Shatner Makes Surprise Appearance [UPDATED</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2009/10/18/star-trek-takes-home-top-spike-scream-awards-shatner-makes-surprise-appearance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/10/18/star-trek-takes-home-top-spike-scream-awards-shatner-makes-surprise-appearance/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:37:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/10/18/star-trek-takes-home-top-spike-scream-awards-shatner-makes-surprise-appearance/comment-page-4/#comment-2703052</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 13:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=8182#comment-2703052</guid>
		<description>Star Trek did win one Oscar: Best Make up. Mainly because it was one of the few categories that neither Avatar or The Hurt Locker were nominated in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Star Trek did win one Oscar: Best Make up. Mainly because it was one of the few categories that neither Avatar or The Hurt Locker were nominated in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jezza</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/10/18/star-trek-takes-home-top-spike-scream-awards-shatner-makes-surprise-appearance/comment-page-4/#comment-2380404</link>
		<dc:creator>jezza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=8182#comment-2380404</guid>
		<description>Pity The Hangover was shut out though</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pity The Hangover was shut out though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/10/18/star-trek-takes-home-top-spike-scream-awards-shatner-makes-surprise-appearance/comment-page-4/#comment-2292550</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 06:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=8182#comment-2292550</guid>
		<description>Star Trek 2009 is great! 
And considering that the franchise was dead, so this ST2009 IS THE MOST SUCCESFUL MOVIE!!  
Let this clear, nobody gave a shit for a STmovie until this amazing reboot!

JJ will kill the new movie if get Shatner to act there! C´mon think about it! Do you really want to see a fat and old Cap Kirk?   I don´t.  
Please! It will be a nightmare!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Star Trek 2009 is great!<br />
And considering that the franchise was dead, so this ST2009 IS THE MOST SUCCESFUL MOVIE!!<br />
Let this clear, nobody gave a shit for a STmovie until this amazing reboot!</p>
<p>JJ will kill the new movie if get Shatner to act there! C´mon think about it! Do you really want to see a fat and old Cap Kirk?   I don´t.<br />
Please! It will be a nightmare!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Son of a Maui Portagee</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/10/18/star-trek-takes-home-top-spike-scream-awards-shatner-makes-surprise-appearance/comment-page-4/#comment-2267737</link>
		<dc:creator>Son of a Maui Portagee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=8182#comment-2267737</guid>
		<description>114. RD,

Brace yourself, I stumbled across this at the LA TIMES:

articles.latimes.com/1999/jun/12/local/me-45666

apparently in fact checking DeForest Kelley&#039;s obituary post publication back in 1999 they came up with this:

&quot;Of the first seven STAR TREK movies, the most successful was the first, STAR TREK: THE MOTION PICTURE which grossed $138.8 million worldwide, according to Exhibitor Relations Co., which tracks box-office receipts.&quot; - Elaine Woo, TIMES Staff Writer, LOS ANGELES TIMES, June 12, 1999, article: DEFOREST KELLEY, ACTOR BELOVED AS DR. MCCOY ON STAR TREK, DIES AT 79, under the section: FOR THE RECORD

According to ERC&#039;s FAQ:

www.ercboxoffice.com/index.php?section=faq

they&#039;ve been at it for more than 30 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>114. RD,</p>
<p>Brace yourself, I stumbled across this at the LA TIMES:</p>
<p>articles.latimes.com/1999/jun/12/local/me-45666</p>
<p>apparently in fact checking DeForest Kelley&#8217;s obituary post publication back in 1999 they came up with this:</p>
<p>&#8220;Of the first seven STAR TREK movies, the most successful was the first, STAR TREK: THE MOTION PICTURE which grossed $138.8 million worldwide, according to Exhibitor Relations Co., which tracks box-office receipts.&#8221; &#8211; Elaine Woo, TIMES Staff Writer, LOS ANGELES TIMES, June 12, 1999, article: DEFOREST KELLEY, ACTOR BELOVED AS DR. MCCOY ON STAR TREK, DIES AT 79, under the section: FOR THE RECORD</p>
<p>According to ERC&#8217;s FAQ:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ercboxoffice.com/index.php?section=faq" rel="nofollow">http://www.ercboxoffice.com/index.php?section=faq</a></p>
<p>they&#8217;ve been at it for more than 30 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Son of a Maui Portagee</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/10/18/star-trek-takes-home-top-spike-scream-awards-shatner-makes-surprise-appearance/comment-page-4/#comment-2267511</link>
		<dc:creator>Son of a Maui Portagee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=8182#comment-2267511</guid>
		<description># 169. Lord Ravenwood once observed &#039;&#039;I actually enjoyed “Star Trek: TMP.”
    At least it had a viable story that was not full of illogical plot holes. It was well directed, well photographed, and had a minimum of lens flares!&#039;&#039;

I did too. And it was a &quot;success&quot;,

image.issuu.com/081118005925-9f40e93cee3c4c56972191995e1bd82a/jpg/page_8.jpg

“Production has begun on STAR TREK II, Paramount’s sequel to its successful STAR TREK – THE MOTION PICTURE.” – BOXOFFICE, December 1981 issue, Vol. 117, No. 12, page 8, in the column HOLLYWOOD REPORT under the subsection PRODUCTION &amp; DEVELOPMENT, 4th paragraph 

image.issuu.com/081118000300-f7eaaa63000f451d88406fea33f551e1/jpg/page_30.jpg

&quot;STAR TREK successfully journeyed from small screen to big as STAR TREK:THE MOTION PICTURE.&quot; – BOXOFFICE, July 1987 issue, Vol. 123 No. 7, page 30, in the article PARAMOUNT: STILL THE BEST SHOW IN TOWN under the subsection  A DECADE BEYOND, 9th paragraph 

But I suspect TMP largely gets a bum rap because it isn&#039;t experienced in its proper venue.

&quot;I still love my movies to be seen in the cinema. That&#039;s where they&#039;re meant to be shown.&quot; - Robert Wise, Director</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 169. Lord Ravenwood once observed &#8221;I actually enjoyed “Star Trek: TMP.”<br />
    At least it had a viable story that was not full of illogical plot holes. It was well directed, well photographed, and had a minimum of lens flares!&#8221;</p>
<p>I did too. And it was a &#8220;success&#8221;,</p>
<p>image.issuu.com/081118005925-9f40e93cee3c4c56972191995e1bd82a/jpg/page_8.jpg</p>
<p>“Production has begun on STAR TREK II, Paramount’s sequel to its successful STAR TREK – THE MOTION PICTURE.” – BOXOFFICE, December 1981 issue, Vol. 117, No. 12, page 8, in the column HOLLYWOOD REPORT under the subsection PRODUCTION &amp; DEVELOPMENT, 4th paragraph </p>
<p>image.issuu.com/081118000300-f7eaaa63000f451d88406fea33f551e1/jpg/page_30.jpg</p>
<p>&#8220;STAR TREK successfully journeyed from small screen to big as STAR TREK:THE MOTION PICTURE.&#8221; – BOXOFFICE, July 1987 issue, Vol. 123 No. 7, page 30, in the article PARAMOUNT: STILL THE BEST SHOW IN TOWN under the subsection  A DECADE BEYOND, 9th paragraph </p>
<p>But I suspect TMP largely gets a bum rap because it isn&#8217;t experienced in its proper venue.</p>
<p>&#8220;I still love my movies to be seen in the cinema. That&#8217;s where they&#8217;re meant to be shown.&#8221; &#8211; Robert Wise, Director</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Ballz</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/10/18/star-trek-takes-home-top-spike-scream-awards-shatner-makes-surprise-appearance/comment-page-4/#comment-2266795</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Ballz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 04:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=8182#comment-2266795</guid>
		<description>Closettrekker, you are one smooth-talkin&#039; son-of-a-gun!! Kudos!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Closettrekker, you are one smooth-talkin&#8217; son-of-a-gun!! Kudos!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Closettrekker</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/10/18/star-trek-takes-home-top-spike-scream-awards-shatner-makes-surprise-appearance/comment-page-4/#comment-2265583</link>
		<dc:creator>Closettrekker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=8182#comment-2265583</guid>
		<description>TMP didn&#039;t have much to offer me as a child, but as an adult fan I have come to admire it very much. Of the original six feature films, I would have to say that I like it only slightly less than TWOK, and only slightly more than TVH.

But I would have to agree than a casual viewer would likely not find much about it that was appealing. I enjoy it because I am invested in the characters, and the V&#039;Ger incident is an important part of their journey in the film era. Without that &quot;built-in&quot; interest, I certainly would not have seen it at least 50 times in the three decades since it has been released. But that interest in the characters is there----and so I have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TMP didn&#8217;t have much to offer me as a child, but as an adult fan I have come to admire it very much. Of the original six feature films, I would have to say that I like it only slightly less than TWOK, and only slightly more than TVH.</p>
<p>But I would have to agree than a casual viewer would likely not find much about it that was appealing. I enjoy it because I am invested in the characters, and the V&#8217;Ger incident is an important part of their journey in the film era. Without that &#8220;built-in&#8221; interest, I certainly would not have seen it at least 50 times in the three decades since it has been released. But that interest in the characters is there&#8212;-and so I have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Ballz</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/10/18/star-trek-takes-home-top-spike-scream-awards-shatner-makes-surprise-appearance/comment-page-4/#comment-2265535</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Ballz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=8182#comment-2265535</guid>
		<description>171

Thanks! :&gt;)

172

Say what you want, but Trek XI was anything but boring!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>171</p>
<p>Thanks! :&gt;)</p>
<p>172</p>
<p>Say what you want, but Trek XI was anything but boring!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Ravenwood</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/10/18/star-trek-takes-home-top-spike-scream-awards-shatner-makes-surprise-appearance/comment-page-4/#comment-2265269</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Ravenwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=8182#comment-2265269</guid>
		<description>170

Same with &quot;Star Trek XI!&quot; I walked out on that polished turd and still didn&#039;t miss a thing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>170</p>
<p>Same with &#8220;Star Trek XI!&#8221; I walked out on that polished turd and still didn&#8217;t miss a thing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shatner_Fan_Prime</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/10/18/star-trek-takes-home-top-spike-scream-awards-shatner-makes-surprise-appearance/comment-page-4/#comment-2264844</link>
		<dc:creator>Shatner_Fan_Prime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=8182#comment-2264844</guid>
		<description>#170 ... LOL, Harry! Good one. Even though I like TMP, I do understand the criticisms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#170 &#8230; LOL, Harry! Good one. Even though I like TMP, I do understand the criticisms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

