Comments on: Star Trek Casting Directors Honored

By: Ironhyde

Ironhyde — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:06:42 +0000

Best Cast movie of the year? Abso-freaking-lutely! Success here made the movie as good as it was and SAVED Star Trek. Best Cast movie ever, as far as I’m concerned =P

By: Star Trek Nominated For 2 Visual Effects Society Awards | Live Long and Propser

Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:28:18 +0000

[...] CSA: Best Casting (Studio Feature Film) [WON] [...]

By: Ernesto Cortez

Ernesto Cortez — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 06:55:44 +0000

I hope the next casting director gets this message…
If “Yeoman Janice Rand” is going to be in the next story line, you need to cast “Mary Lynn Rajskub.” She is a dead ringer for Grace Lee Whitney was on the first season of the original Star Trek.

By: Star Trek Casting Directors Honored | Trekmovie.Com « bobbyswhateversite

Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:54:03 +0000

[...] The 2009 Artios is Webster’s third, she previously won for her casting on Lost and CSI . Webster also won an Emmy in 20005 for casting, which she also shared with Weisberg. Casting directors approve of the new crew. More buzz for Trek … He should have been a hardcore badass like Christian Bale in Batman Begins and particularly in The Dark Knight, Daniel Craig in Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace, Matt Damon in the Bourne trilogy and Liam Neeson in Taken. …More Here [...]

By: montgomery

montgomery — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:20:47 +0000

Finally an award that there is no doubt deserved by STXI. Congratulations. This is the greatest success of this film.

After all, Star Trek was

1. badly scripted (most, if not all, the plot holes and logical inconsistencies could have been corrected with subtle tweaks to the story);

2. dumb (I’m still not sure what the science adviser did except steal her pay check — bring back Sternbach!); and

3. poorly filmed (the shaking and camera flares were absolutely indefensible and the result of bad set design, so it was all a mess building on a mess).

But they cast it damn good. =)

By: The Brit

The Brit — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:33:17 +0000

23. Closettrekker – November 4, 2009

Thank you for your reply. Please comment on the rest of my post and I’d also like to hear your comments on the intriguing views in posts 5-8.

By: Closettrekker

Closettrekker — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:03:37 +0000

#9—-There wasn’t a single thing about Nemesis more satisfying than ST09….I don’t know how you could even bring yourself to post that….

By: Bill Lutz

Bill Lutz — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:02:13 +0000

It might hva ebeen the most sucessful, Manilla, but it WAS NOT a Trek movie…not by a long shot. Still, kudos to the casting directors and regards to the writers dunsels.

By: USS Manila NCC-99232

USS Manila NCC-99232 — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:12:39 +0000

This is really the most successful of all Trek movies dude!

By: Andy

Andy — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:56:27 +0000

#4
Dude you don’t know what you’re talking about. Do you even realize how important Casting Directors are? Comparing their award to some arrogant blabble about “best stand in” is just a shame. So much goes into consideration while casting films. Especially an finding an group of stars that work together on film so well.

Congradualtions on winning the award, a film well casted!