


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exclusive Video Interview: JJ Abrams Talks Star Trek Sequel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2009/11/18/exclusive-video-interview-jj-abrams-talks-star-trek-sequel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/11/18/exclusive-video-interview-jj-abrams-talks-star-trek-sequel/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 06:21:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Peters</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/11/18/exclusive-video-interview-jj-abrams-talks-star-trek-sequel/comment-page-4/#comment-2380181</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=8840#comment-2380181</guid>
		<description>One word:

BORG!!!

Do the freakin borg and it will be the best trek movie of all time... maybe have Q make an appearance just for fun... or not...

BUT THE BORG WOULD KICK SOME *****!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One word:</p>
<p>BORG!!!</p>
<p>Do the freakin borg and it will be the best trek movie of all time&#8230; maybe have Q make an appearance just for fun&#8230; or not&#8230;</p>
<p>BUT THE BORG WOULD KICK SOME *****!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aeo</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/11/18/exclusive-video-interview-jj-abrams-talks-star-trek-sequel/comment-page-4/#comment-2376008</link>
		<dc:creator>Aeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=8840#comment-2376008</guid>
		<description>Seems to me the Romulans were pretty well genetically enhanced. that ought to scare the everliving crap out of Starfleet. It would give the new time line a very... different... view of Kahn&#039;s work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me the Romulans were pretty well genetically enhanced. that ought to scare the everliving crap out of Starfleet. It would give the new time line a very&#8230; different&#8230; view of Kahn&#8217;s work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/11/18/exclusive-video-interview-jj-abrams-talks-star-trek-sequel/comment-page-4/#comment-2367072</link>
		<dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=8840#comment-2367072</guid>
		<description>Its easy to bring Shatner back. How do we know he&#039;s not still in the Nexus just like Whoopi Goldberg? Anyway, I never did understand how Kirk got from riding his horse to suddenly being back in Death Valley at the exact moment of Piccard&#039;s choosing (didn&#039;t choose a very good moment did he - better to have gone back to Zoran&#039;s birth!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its easy to bring Shatner back. How do we know he&#8217;s not still in the Nexus just like Whoopi Goldberg? Anyway, I never did understand how Kirk got from riding his horse to suddenly being back in Death Valley at the exact moment of Piccard&#8217;s choosing (didn&#8217;t choose a very good moment did he &#8211; better to have gone back to Zoran&#8217;s birth!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Son of a Maui Portagee</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/11/18/exclusive-video-interview-jj-abrams-talks-star-trek-sequel/comment-page-4/#comment-2347844</link>
		<dc:creator>Son of a Maui Portagee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=8840#comment-2347844</guid>
		<description>#153.,

Well, Ellison IS on record as being interested:

http://harlanellison.com/heboard/unca.htm?beg=69&amp;num=25</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#153.,</p>
<p>Well, Ellison IS on record as being interested:</p>
<p><a href="http://harlanellison.com/heboard/unca.htm?beg=69&amp;num=25" rel="nofollow">http://harlanellison.com/heboard/unca.htm?beg=69&amp;num=25</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willi523</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/11/18/exclusive-video-interview-jj-abrams-talks-star-trek-sequel/comment-page-4/#comment-2346936</link>
		<dc:creator>willi523</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=8840#comment-2346936</guid>
		<description>Thee words for a slam dunk sequal.  Temporal Cold War!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thee words for a slam dunk sequal.  Temporal Cold War!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shatner_Fan_Prime</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/11/18/exclusive-video-interview-jj-abrams-talks-star-trek-sequel/comment-page-4/#comment-2344289</link>
		<dc:creator>Shatner_Fan_Prime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=8840#comment-2344289</guid>
		<description>#172 &quot;The new film was good, but was was cowardly to the core.&quot;

Well said. Good and cowardly often go hand in hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#172 &#8220;The new film was good, but was was cowardly to the core.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well said. Good and cowardly often go hand in hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. John Ross</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/11/18/exclusive-video-interview-jj-abrams-talks-star-trek-sequel/comment-page-4/#comment-2344198</link>
		<dc:creator>S. John Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=8840#comment-2344198</guid>
		<description>#171: I&#039;m too busy being one of the people actually helping Star Trek live on, &quot;dude.&quot; I&#039;m not pouting ... I just want _courage_ in my Trek, and I&#039;m not ashamed to say so. The new film was good, but was was cowardly to the core.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#171: I&#8217;m too busy being one of the people actually helping Star Trek live on, &#8220;dude.&#8221; I&#8217;m not pouting &#8230; I just want _courage_ in my Trek, and I&#8217;m not ashamed to say so. The new film was good, but was was cowardly to the core.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shatner_Fan_Prime</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/11/18/exclusive-video-interview-jj-abrams-talks-star-trek-sequel/comment-page-4/#comment-2342738</link>
		<dc:creator>Shatner_Fan_Prime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=8840#comment-2342738</guid>
		<description>#169 ... Whatever you say, dude. The Star Trek party will go on whether you show up or sit at home pouting.  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#169 &#8230; Whatever you say, dude. The Star Trek party will go on whether you show up or sit at home pouting.  ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stargazer</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/11/18/exclusive-video-interview-jj-abrams-talks-star-trek-sequel/comment-page-4/#comment-2341730</link>
		<dc:creator>Stargazer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=8840#comment-2341730</guid>
		<description>Thanks DOM... I typed it rathre fast, so I did not have time to paragraph it. I have been writting several Star Trek Based Storeys lumped into one time line. Different century from the current Star Trek line of events. Now since temporal mechanics is now involved since the Nero Factor, im at a loss where to continue or start anothre chapter. I am based on Spock Prime line of events over the centurys. I have been writing since I was 15. In my Storey there is a Tempoural Prime Directive. We Scan time for inconsistancies, apparently there is one. It has changed the events in my century I am writing about.   

What year did Romulas&#039;s star become supernova? I dont need the star date. Will it Supernova in the new time line, It should. Or a reoccurring paradox of events. 

Suggestions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks DOM&#8230; I typed it rathre fast, so I did not have time to paragraph it. I have been writting several Star Trek Based Storeys lumped into one time line. Different century from the current Star Trek line of events. Now since temporal mechanics is now involved since the Nero Factor, im at a loss where to continue or start anothre chapter. I am based on Spock Prime line of events over the centurys. I have been writing since I was 15. In my Storey there is a Tempoural Prime Directive. We Scan time for inconsistancies, apparently there is one. It has changed the events in my century I am writing about.   </p>
<p>What year did Romulas&#8217;s star become supernova? I dont need the star date. Will it Supernova in the new time line, It should. Or a reoccurring paradox of events. </p>
<p>Suggestions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. John Ross</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/11/18/exclusive-video-interview-jj-abrams-talks-star-trek-sequel/comment-page-4/#comment-2341386</link>
		<dc:creator>S. John Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=8840#comment-2341386</guid>
		<description>#167: &quot;You’re both full of it. Kirk will not die on screen again.&quot;

I&#039;d go so far as to predict that for the next several years, Kirk will continue to not BE on screen again, dead or alive. In his place, we&#039;ll have Anakirk, doing some pod-races for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#167: &#8220;You’re both full of it. Kirk will not die on screen again.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d go so far as to predict that for the next several years, Kirk will continue to not BE on screen again, dead or alive. In his place, we&#8217;ll have Anakirk, doing some pod-races for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

