Mashup Weekend: Picard & The Prime Timeline Strike Back November 27, 2009
by TrekMovie.com Staff , Filed under: Great Links, Humor , trackback
Today is Day Two of our Thanksgiving Weekend Star Trek Mashup Marathon. This time we take a look at a couple of imaginative alternate endings to the 2009 Star Trek movie, where Capt. Picard and his crew of the Enterprise fight to defend the Prime Timeline. Check them out below.
Star Trek 2009 Alt Ending 1
Video by NBKbauer
Star Trek 2009 Alt Ending 2
Video by GeneralGrin
So which is your favorite?
Loading ...
Comments»
Me likey!
That second one was hilarious! One of the best I’ve seen yet!
Next Gen Suck! Enterprise D is like a big flying Teapot!
I’ll take Kirk & Crew ( any timeline ) , over the self righteous Next Gen Crew any day of the week!!
Fun.
First one ends the movie before it begins, though. But I’m always happy to see Jean-Luc in command.
- Harry
#3: Seems we’ve cross-posted.
You know, the first one isn’t that bad, but WHY do people always have starfleet captains blowing up other starfleet ships/people in these things? Additionally, this NEW Enterprise could kick the Enterprise D’s butt, IMHO.
Notice the main difference between the two? Picard saves the other bald Captain, but he destroys Chris Pine with the great hair.
Star Trek 2012 REVENGE OF THE BALDIES!
Directed by Larry David.
Lame. Both of them.
They had to blow it up. It was an offense against aesthetics. :P
The first one is more seemless, I like it a lot more… the second one, was ok Uniforms kept changing, and the Prime NCC-1701 refit was used during the blow up rather than the new 1701.. making it feel less realistic
why do some people act like if they like Kirk they can’t also like Picard?
I thought the second one was the best. Thanks for posting these, Mr. Pascale.
Liked the first one best. :-)
The 2nd one was the best!.
Now the DVD is out, I suspect there’s no end to these.
Ahh, the Christmas gift that keeps on giving.
Both good fun, but #2? ha ha! you go, JLP!
Haha, they’re both great. I love how the first video shrinks the movie to about two minutes. And I love how they easily destroy the Enterprise in the second video.
I liked the first one.. more seamless… The editing was chopping in the second on. but good work on both.
I like all the captains of Trek but Captain John Harriman of “Big E -B” is by far the best.
GeneralGrin has some of the very best videos on youtube.
CBS are going to do a TNG series, set in the Nero incurred universe. It wil depict new/yet classic origin of the TNG crew, from Picard’s command of the Stargazer to the assembly of Data.
Bank on it.
I like the second one.
You scratched my star ship you bastard, now you die kirk!
Fyi I like both captains in the prime universe, although the new kirk lacks some of the old ones charms, he was good in that role but not great.
I thought they were both great; but you know – they made me sad too. I did a few funny mashups – they were a lot of fun to make. But I got told off by Paramount; got a nastygram from youtube; had to take them offline.
I hope these ones stay onlne
Both a really good. New move its a fail, i hope star trek survive JJ Abrams.
I do make a type post on internets bored.
These videos are hilarious. It seems Star Trek is as much about BALDLY GOING as much as BOLDLY going. Which explains why Captain Picard destroys Captain Kirk while saving Captain Rabau and the Kelvin. It must be a difference of philosphy!
Someone should do a mash-up featuring bald villians!
With no current t.v series and the next movie not due til 2012, at least we have over 700 hours of Trek to inspire more mashups.
The editing on these things has all the sophistication of kidnappers taping together headline clippings to create ransom notes.
At least the tiresome traditionalists seem to have switched sides in the neverending “Picard versus Kirk” debate.
The second one was great. Of course the clip from Yesterday’s Enterprise is a good reminder of just how much ST09’s whole “prime universe” is bs.
2 should have been a bounus feature…
Dumb & Dumber
The second one is very funny!
And the Ent-D would blow the ST 2009 Enterpriseout of the water.
#1 lame, but funny. #2 painful to watch, but imaginative.
Both were well done. I prefer the 1st one though. Like post # 4 said. It ends the movie before it begins!
Anything would work to prevent that horrid JJ-verse from occurring.
#27 Nothing like a good ole’ “Kirk Vs Picard” debate!
#33 That’s too bad you didn’t like the movie. But to each his own. I thought it was great and hope you change your mind about it.
YESSSS!!!!!
Picard obliterates the J.J. Verse :P :P
The first one showed a fast way to save Vulcan in the next movie. Maybe they could think up a story to last two hours with the same result and there you have the sequel with Vulcan not being destroyed. And bring back Shat/Prime Kirk while your at it.
Loved the first one, could have done without the second one.
I like Picard A LOT, but James T. Kirk was my hero throughout my childhood and beyond. I CAN like them both, I just favor Kirk a bit more.
I’ve come to accept that Star Trek 09 is a fantastic movie for what it is, but it remains bad Star Trek…
@ 19
Oh yeah, I also love captain noob-dumbass Harriman, with his trademark dumbass “what do I do?” face, lol
I’ve been pointing out the similarityies between the “black holes” in STXI and the temporal anomoly in Yesterday’s Enterprise for ages now.
It’s nice to see it acknowledged (the correlation, not me pointing it out).
The first one is well executed and makes more sense, but the second one was funniest.
“You don’t deserve to wear that uniform”
Darn tootin’! (I did like STXI, but Kirk’s promotion still doesn’t make much sense. He should have been assigned as Pike’s weapons officer or something, somewhere that Pike could keep an eye on him and raise him through the ranks.)
First Contact was awesome, new ship, new uniform and the borg, too bad it wasn’t Locutus from the past/alternate reality vs Picard.
Watching Enterprise series now to quench thirst.
Thanks for all the great comments!
I edited the 1st one, I would hope that the edit is pretty seamless as I am a professional editor.
THANK YOU FOR POSTING MY VIDEO GUYS!
Hey Schindlerlin,
I thought the editting, particularly with respect to the musical continuity and preserving the pace of the cuts worked rather well. I think I have a keen eye for detail, so it’s high praise when I say that it was fairly seamless.
The only place it fell down was on the shot with the E-E superimposed onto the Kelvin’s windshield. The windows to the left and right gave the game away, but I suppose you can’t be blamed for that. The First Contact shot was only so wide.
Can I ask why you letterboxed it to such an extent? I remember being able to see Randy Pausch’s face in it before. Aren’t both films shot in the same aspect ratio?
And I too enjoyed the 2nd video.
Both are clever, but the editing on the first one is awesome!
Hey Bren,
Thank you, I wasn’t paying attention and drug the 2.4.0 mask onto the timeline instead of the 1.8.5. oops!
I didn’t notice until I posted it and it already had like 50 views, so I decided that it was no big deal and that I would leave it up.
I suppose I could have gone into after effects to do a better matte with the viewscreen, but I did the whole thing on my lunch break in about 10 minutes, so, I figured it was fun for what it was.
I’m glad everyone enjoyed the video, I didn’t expect that it would get posted here, but I think it’s really cool that it was.
Star Trek First Contact was Academy Standard
Star Trek 2009 was anamorphic, the difference is very subtle.
Really I probably didn’t need a mask. Ah well. At least it was a chance to edit something fun for a change.
Although this is my favorite of all the mashups that I’ve done:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjZ_HQV3DHY
I liked how Picard was talking smack in the 2nd one, but I thought the first one was just done better.
But I don’t think the Ent D would blow the JJ-verse Constitution class out of the water, since the ST09 Enterprise is backwards-engineered from scans of the Narada’s technology, which was way-advanced even for 24th Century (if you buy into Countdown, also Borg-tech influenced)
48. yeah, that’s great!!
BTW, the one at the top of this page was great as well!
#48 Classic. He obiously had too much beans ‘n bourbon!
Also, watching the second one again, I love how Picard blew him out of space basically out of spite.
50:
What do you mean backward-engineered? They didn’t even know what it was until after the Vulcan Disaster. The 1701-E represents 200+years of weapons improvements, presumably from nearly the same starting point as ST:XI, new timeline or not.
How would the D not destroy the original, 200 year-old relic?
Nero says in the movie that in his time that the Nerada is “a simple mining vessel”
So I figure the the Enterprise E could probably destroy it without breaking a sweat.
I never read the comic, I wanted to but never got a chance.
“Oh, that was too easy!”
Love it! LOL
Would have been cool if the Enterprise did go through the black hole and their mission starts off like this by exploring strange new realities and dimensions.
lolz to be had! The second one made me laugh!
I like the first one more, however I laughed out loud during second :-)) well done!
Liked the first one. The second one is just puerile though. I really can’t stand understand the need to put down one thing just because you like another.
Which TNG Episode is it with Kirk and the old Enterprise? I don’t know this one…
Ok who can name all the TNG episodes used to make the 2nd mashup?
61. Data looking at old records comes from “The Naked Now”, TNG’s second episode. Funny thing is, it’s the movie-era refit he’s looking at, not the original as you would expect.
I like the first one best. It neatly puts everything back on track. :p
Haha… nice.
The Terran Empire would blow them both up!!!. Long live the Empire!!!!.
Bleh, people face it, its all GONEEE hahahahaha!
The first one was good, the second one was wishful thinking.
Anthony–if you are going to do mashups, how can you NOT do the ORIGINAL, greatest mashup ever…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpDhIr7i5Go
The second video was a knockoff of the one above.
Jeez! And people think TOS fans are sad for wanting a Bill Shatner cameo?!!!
Those clip reels reeked of desperation! TNG is over and the actors are too old! Even Leonard Nimoy only had an extended cameo in ST09!
Get over it! :0
Besides the new Enterprise with Kirk or Pike at the helm could whip the Enterprise-D or -E’s arses!! ;)
Let’s think about this again. The new Enterprise is longer than the Enterprise-D. Wouldn’t Picard hesitate before blowing up something that the Federation created that bigger than his own ship?
And my lack of enthusiasm for the second clip is predicated, in part, on the very un-Starfleet-like behavior of Captain Picard, who would probably get thrown in the brig and court-martialed for having done what he did.
And yes, I do realize that the clips are in jest. And yes, I will lighten up. :-) But still….
#34: I will NEVER change my mind about this crap known as , “Star Trek XI!”
This is simply crap that JJ Abrams slapped together and tried to pass off as “Star Trek,” that’s all.
He couldn’t direct his way out of a rice paper bag!
#69: Rick Hat.
If you really want to pick things apart: Picard’s Technology is from a century later than this “ST09.” Picard could blow the JJ-prise out of the Galaxy.
Cadet Kirk would never have been promoted to Captain fresh out of Starfleet Academy either!
I’m still of the ilk that Kirk could be Picard even if he were in a rowboat with a broken oar.
Real reason some fans didn’t like the new film? The new Enterprise is better then anything that Bald blowhard ever commanded.
71, is that really a good reason to blow up a perfectly good, brand new ship? I doubt it. Especially give that it’s unknown Federation technology and has Federation personnel on board.
Further, if the Enterprise 1701 was indeed so inferior to the 1701-D, then why would Picard have to destroy it to win? He could simply disable it, if necessary.
If the second clip were true, Picard would most likely be court-martialed for mass murder.
I don’t understand the idea that, since TNG E is from 100+- years ahead of the ST2009, it must be be soooooo much better than Kirk’s E.
Fans & writers all assume that’s how it is, but why?
Why MUST that be so?
Look at modern weaponry – a bullet is a bullet is a bullet. A .45 long colt round from an 1870’s Colt SAA is still a perfectly lethal round and is every bit as “advanced” as a .45 acp. Granted, a Glock is made of synthetic materials, and can fire semi-auto, so it’s a little better in some ways than the Single Action Colts, but the actual bullet that does the killing – THAT part has hardly changed at all.
Or look at vehicle-mounted weaponry. Same deal – a WWII battleship’s artillery may not have computer-controlled targeting, but it’s not as if a WWII-era projectile would bounce harmlessly off a modern ship.
Also, Trek fans take it for granted that the 100-year difference in technology between TOS & TNG must be the same as the difference between modern tech & stuff from the late 18th, early 20th century. Why?
Doesn’t it make just as much sense to assume that the difference between TNG tech & TOS tech could be comparable to the difference between, say, a Viking longship from the year 850 AD & one from the year 950 AD?
It makes perfect sense to assume that the TOS weaponry & shields are the exact same thing, & thus every bit as “powerful” & “advanced” as the TNG E.
# 75
There is no logic in your statements.
1.) A 21st century Battlecruiser like the russian Kirov-Class could sank an entire fleet of Bismarcks or Iowas from WWII within a range the old battleships could only dream of.
2.) A 1870 Army Colt is not only slower, it is more difficult to hit a target within 20 meters. No problem for a 21st century gun.
3.) Fact is, the TNG ships are faster than the TOS-Counterparts. Means, that they need far more energy. More energy also means more power for phasers and shields. No chance for a 23rd century starship against its counterpart form the late 24th century.
Picard’s Enterprise-E will blast Kirks’ Enterprise within seconds. It’s like a battle between USS Constitution (the one with the sails) and USS Iowa BB-61.
Overall I like the first one better. However, I absolutely dig the ending of the second clip, particularly Picard’s last line!
I tend to agree with you, 75, that progress in technology can be quite gradualistic. However, it is possible to think of it as more a kind of punctuated equilibrium, wherein long periods of slow evolution are suddenly interrupted by rapid increases in technological power.
Thus, let me take the opposing view just for the sake of argument. In 1909, the most advanced warship in the U.S. Navy tipped the scales at about 16,000 tons (e.g., the battleship USS Connecticut, part of the Great White Fleet). Today, the most advanced ship in the Navy are our supercarriers, displacing about 100,000 tons. But the leaps in technology that matters actually took place in the interim, when aircraft technology advanced to the point that ships had to fight not just other ships, but also aircraft, as well. This is when the battleship began losing its status as the ship of the line.
Light aircraft had begun to be deployed in reconnaissance and other roles as early as the World War I era, but aircraft carriers really came into their own in the 1940’s. When it became clear that aircraft carriers were far more powerful than battleships after the conclusion of World War II, rapid advancement in aircraft and missile technology made it impossible for a battleship to survive an attack by a modern battle group. Even the Iowa-class battleships last deployed under President Reagan would have found it impossible to survive a serious attack by a carrier group.
Modern carrier battle groups form a protective bubble around themselves ranging out 200 or so miles and potentially into space itself using radar, air patrols, anti-air missiles, and CIWS systems. A battleship, whose guns have a range of about 20 to 25 miles, would have no way of penetrating this shield because it simply would not be allowed to get close enough to the group to do harm.
Thus, while it’s true that naval development had progressed only evolutionarily for hundreds of years, the pace of naval development increased considerably between about 1914 to date. One need not point to the rapid development of computer technologies to see, therefore, that much can change in the matter of a century.
By the same token, the day of aircraft carrier supremacy may be numbered and submarines are now seen as increasingly indispensable. In theory, carriers groups could defend against even space-based attacks — our escort warships carry missiles that can shoot down satellites — but in practice, the Navy remains concerned that adversary nations might be able to destroy our carriers using ballistic missiles.
The next generation of American carriers may have laser-based defenses. Railguns are theorized as possible replacements for certain kinds of sea-based missiles. Such exotic technologies are obvious quantum leaps from naval technology of a century ago.
Also, the pace of technological development has advanced and the model seen for this is the computer industry (e.g., the so-called “Moore’s Law”).
The historical comparisons above don’t apply, I think, because in Trek we’re talking entirely fictional weapon technology like phaser guns and shields. Writers (or in this case YouTubers) can make the evolution and comparative strength of these weapons any way they like.
It would be different if we had, say, plasma beams as offensive weapons and electromagnetic fields as shields. In this case we could at least calculate some required energy outputs etc. based on actual physics. But not if we have no clue as to how the stuff is supposed to work. And so we also can’t say if the historical development of these fictional weapons should be analogous to actual historical developments or not.
80, valid points, but in that case, no one conception of the power of these weapons is more valid than another, and thus those who say that these weapons do, in fact, evolve progressively and linearly have just as valid a point as those who may contend otherwise.
It’s also quite valid to say that historical comparisons do not determine the course of future evolution. However, we do know from experience that today’s technologies are generally more powerful, or at least better at what they do, than the same technologies achieving the same functionalities as before. For example, the F-22 model of fighter aircraft is much better at what it does than the F-15 model it replaces. In actual war games between the two kinds of aircraft, the kill ratio between the F-22 and the F-15 is something like 144 to zero (meaning the F-15 lost 144 times in an engagement against the F-22). This is so even though both the F-15 and the F-22 are twin-engined jet fighters and the F-15 is actually larger and heavier than the F-22. The F-15 is also faster on afterburners than the F-22.
The F-15 was developed in the late 1960’s. An F-22 against an aircraft from 1909 (the Wright Flyer) would be yield far more lopsided results, if possible.
However, there are points to be made for your argument, as well. It may well be, then that it just depends on the comparisons one makes.
“The F-15 may also be faster on afterburners than the F-22 on supercruise according to published figures.” As corrected.
Erm, just to clarify: I meant the technology in the JJ-verse would have a potential Borg-basis to it, since the Narada is a combination of Romulan and Borg technology. (once again, if you accept Countdown as cannon. And, if not, the JJ-verse Enterprise is still based on 24th Century technology anyway, which all leads back to the Kelvin attack)
81 Hat Rick said: “no one conception of the power of these weapons is more valid than another, and thus those who say that these weapons do, in fact, evolve progressively and linearly have just as valid a point as those who may contend otherwise.”
Exactly.
People keep making comparisons between late 20th/early 21st century technologies vs. stuff from the late 19th/early 20th and use that as a model for the difference between TOS & TNG.
There’s nothing wrong with that, & it makes perfect sense, BUT it makes every bit as much sense to use, as your model for the difference between TOS & TNG tech, the difference between Roman technology of the 1st Century vs. the 2nd, or the difference between Viking tech of the 8th Century vs. Viking tech or the 9th century, ie, no difference at all.
A lot of fans and writers just take it for granted that the current technological rate of change will maintain indefinitely, but it makes just as much sense to suppose that the slope of the rate of change varies over time. In other words, a mashup where the TOS-E blows the crap out of the TNG-E would make as much sense as anything else.
#76 says: “Picard’s Enterprise-E will blast Kirks’ Enterprise within seconds. It’s like a battle between USS Constitution (the one with the sails) and USS Iowa BB-61.”
Just to reiterate….why?
Since it’s all fiction, that takes place IN THE FUTURE, why can’t we say the difference between Kirk’s E. & Picard’s E. is like a battle between a Viking ship from the year 850 & a Viking ship from the year 950? Why can’t we say the difference between the Constitutions & Sovereign’s shields is the same as the difference between chainmail from 500AD & chainmail from FIVE HUNDRED years later?
The answer, of course, is that we can.
It would make just as much sense if someone made a mashup where Kirk’s E. blows the crap out of Picard’s ship.
#75-Neplor:
WRONG!
The D or E would win against the new Constitution-class. No contest.
Also, the first video = win.
#86-Guardian:
You’re absolutely right, and everything I said is wrong. After thinking about it, if something is built 100 years later than something else, it is more advanced and completely immune to the earlier technology.
Like, if a Viking from 800 AD tried to fight a Saxon from 900 AD, the Viking’s sword would just bounce off the Saxon’s more advanced chainmail. And the Saxon’s sword would slice through the Viking’s mail like it wasn’t even there – because stuff from 900 AD is 100 years more advanced than stuff from 800 AD.
Or like if a guy from the year 31,000 BC went up against someone from a THOUSAND years in the future. That’s a difference of not just a hundred years, but a THOUSAND. That’s a lot. Just think abut the difference between now and one thousand years ago; now think how much more advanced an obsidian spear from 30,000 BC is compared to one from 31,000 BC. I bet a guy armed with technology from the year 30,000 BC could singlehandedly conquer the world of 31,000 BC.
Once again it seems like what JJ did as a lark has turned into what others are doing as a colossal waste of time. (Get a life will you people?)
Why doesn’t anyone bring up the fact that the New E’s weapons systems and the weapons systems of all Federation ships in the new film, save for the Kelvin, are more advanced, in a way. There are many sources that claim the new Enterprise and all of Starfleet’s tech changed due to advancements in design which were obtained by the detailed scans of the Narada by the Kelvin’s fleet of shuttles. The Narada’s weapons may not have been copied exactly, but the advancement from what would have been normal TOS weapons to the new weapons was drastic. If you look at how the Narada batteled with the Enterprise E in “Countdown”, the Narada was doing quite well against the Soverign class vessel. So I would see a battle between the Ent-E against the new Enterprise would be more like a battle between a WWII-era submarine and a current submarine. Sure there are advantages, but don’t count the other one out.
Furthermore, I see the new Enterprise possible destroying or disabling the Ent-D. The Galaxy class was big sure. But never once was there a time where it’s weapon’s system shown as a giant advancement from the TOS and Movie Enterprise-nil. The Ent-D still used photons and phasers. I’d also like to point out that an aging Klingon Bird of Prey destroyed the Enterprise D. Everyone here knows that BoP’s are older vessels but the disruptor blasts from that ship dealt a fatal blow to the D. Sure, they did penetrate the shields, but in STIII the shield-less Enterprise was also hit several times, did it’s warp core breach?
While some are going to say “the writers wrote it that way” that is because the writers aren’t going to write something that is so unbelievable that people dismiss it. If they wanted, they could write the TOS Enterprise taking on an entire fleet of Soverign class ships and destroying them all, but they don’t because they work in a limited universe of technology. People want to whine because Picard is out now, and I understand that, but this childish “Picard’s Enterprise would so totally own the new Enterprise” is uneducated fanboyish drivel. In short, KIRK IS BACK, PICARD AND HIS CREW ARE GONE, DEAL WITH IT.
The bottom line here is Picard has 24th Century shields and Quantum Torpedo’s. As we have seen in the TV shows and movies, old style phasers and photon torpedo’s would not penetrate 24th century shields and those quantum torpedos blew up the Borg!
Given that Nero’s ship is Borg enhanced Picard should have the fire power to destroy Nero’s ship and NCC-1701.
As someone else said, if Picard had have followed through the worm hole like First Contact, ST09 would have been a short movie!
Yeah, go Picard
I can’t believe people are nitpicking MASH-UPS created for FUN. On the other hand, maybe I shouldn’t be so surprised. After all, we’re all Trekkies and ‘nitpicking’ is synonymous with Trekkie. I quite enjoyed these mash-ups and don’t care about the silliness. In fact, the silliness makes it so enjoyable.
i think it is pretty funny people are nitpicking mashups, but in now way am I surprised
Anthony, I do agree it’s funny but it is one thing to pick apart a mashup and another thing to nitpick an episode or movie. I have definately nitpicked shows and episodes and enjoyed the ‘Nitpicker’s Guide for…….Trekkers” books.
Neplor you make some interesting points. But in the episode “Yesterday’s Enterprise” it is flat out stated that The Ent-D shields have “heat dissipation rate of double or triple” the Ent C! From that line of dialogue it is safe to assume that, at the very least, deflector technology has advanced over the years and it is MORE logical to compare the phaser and photon development to that of the shields than that of clubs and chain-mail.
By the way, comparing the prime Enterprise-D to J.J’s Enterprise is irrelevant for the fact that the Enterprise-D of the alternate timeline’s future would be significantly different and more advanced presumably because the new J.J Enterprise is not the exact ship it is in the prime time. As a result, there should be no basis for arguing which ship would come out on top. It would be impossible for the two ships to meet because of the quantum mechanics explained by Bob Orci. And here I am nitpicking…..
Picard FTW!
76. Captain Rickover
Jim Kirk’s taken out bad guys from more technologically advanced civilisations before. Faced with the Enterprise-D, he’s probably laugh, outwit them because he’s the highest-IQ serial offender in Iowa and tow them back to HQ!
Remember, Kirk’s history of criminality will hold him in good stead! ;)
Of course it’s reasonable to assume that generally later technology will be better than earlier technology, even for entirely fictional tech.
But the point remains that we can’t really determine *how much* more powerful 24th century weapons should be compared to 23rd century weapons, how significantly they evolve ober 100 years. And therefore, writers are entitled to make up these advancements whichever way they like. And in particular up-mashing YouTubers who are not even committed to Trek canon. But I don’t think this means that everybody’s right in this debate. It means the author is right by default in such matters.
93, 94: Think that for some of us it might simply be fun to nitpick or to scrutinize mash-ups created for fun. Anyway, for me it is fun.
thats how the moive should of been the enterprise E comes in to save the day thats what the it looked likewas going to happen in the film
Too funny! But if it weren’t for reboots than Star Trek would have not gotten attention again.
BLOOPER! In the second video, during the “Yesterday’s Enterprise” scene, you can see the boom mike at the top of the set! Around the 53 second mark.
Never noticed that before….
It’s not a boom mike. It’s a [tech tech tech] that just LOOKS like a boom mike.
This is Trek, after all.
Ah, sweet robo-vindication.
Hysterical, and awesome.
To those who believe in Rule #1701, Kirk would have the upper hand in the new Star Trek movie, sorry Picard fans. The new enterprise is much larger than the depicted in this episode. The scale of the NCC-1701-A is 900 feet. The NCC-1701-D is 1927.5 feet, even the NCC-1701-E is 2,057.1 feet, and the NCC-1701 (JJ-prise) is 2500 feet, plus upgrades to the weapons compared to the prime universe. In short, I’m afraid you (or he/she who created this video) are mistaken, and 1701-D would be PWNED!!!
Alternate ending 1 is cool, I guess. Read the above for alternate ending 2
neither one makes any sense who put this nonsense together
Please reverse/restore the timeline!