Comments on: Zoe Saldana Avatar Premiere Photos + Trek Comments + Early Avatar Reviews (including Simon Pegg’s)

By: Elias

Elias — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:59:11 +0000

I love you Them

By: jocor

jocor — Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:18:21 +0000

Sigourney is still the queen of Sci-Fi.

By: somethoughts

somethoughts — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 15:29:44 +0000

Did Simon put on a little weight? He looks quite jolly in that pic :)

I cannot reach da buttons Capt’em

By: ryanhuyton

ryanhuyton — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 06:10:51 +0000

I’m looking forward to this movie. It will be curious to see if this movie makes it’s money back and earns a profit. Judging by how well James Cameron’s films have done, I think it will do great. On the other hand, it did cost between $250-300 million, so there is no guarantee.

And finally, Zoe Saldana looks great as she is and as she is in Avatar. I’m thinking she will explode career-wise and may even be nominated for an Oscar one day.

By: S. John Ross

S. John Ross — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 18:33:12 +0000

#21: “Maybe this is the Star Trek movie we’re waiting for?”

We get a couple every now and then. One thing I learned many years ago is if I really want new Trek, the best place to look for it is almost never behind an official Star Trek logo, because Star Trek’s corporate handlers have been leaning harder and harder toward absolute timidity with each passing paycheck.

By: Michael

Michael — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 17:01:32 +0000

I predict ALL of Trek’s accalades to be lost or diminished in this late yeat entry By Cameron. Unfortunately, it’s FX will blow Trek’s out of the water big time. Sad, but true. But knowing the Academy, scifi is always a loser. D*ck heads that they all are.

By: P Technobabble

P Technobabble — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:51:43 +0000

I saw the Avatar trailer in 3-D and was blown away by the visual experience. The look of this film is what is revolutionary. The story is, seemingly, a very basic, simple story… but this story has never been done like this before… I think that is what is significant. Cameron is always finding ways to push the envelope, as far as the scope of a movie. While he is quite capable of making a “small” film (Terminator, Aliens…), he is also quite at home making the epic (Titanic, Avatar…).
I am very much looking forward to seeing this film in 3-D. I do not know how the film will play in standard, because the 3-D is so stunning. But I believe it will be a film to watch.
As for Zoe…. she is certainly lovely to look at, but her screen presence is what really does it (for me, anyway). She is so full of energy, you can’t take your eyes off her. All the power to her!!!

By: DJT

DJT — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:19:16 +0000

Love Zoe. She looks incredible and has that instantly recognizable intelligence in her eyes and speech. Wonderful.

By: Nivenus

Nivenus — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 09:17:55 +0000

I’m holding my thoughts on Avatar until I actually see it, particularly given the good reviews, but Pegg’s comparison isn’t exactly spot on.

They’ve released plenty of footage of Avatar by now. While an opinion about Avatar before seeing it might not be *fully* informed, it’s certainly not *un*informed.

And the same could certainly be said about the clips released for Star Trek before its release. And while I enjoyed those clips I’d be willing to bet that a lot of the people who derided those clips went on to deride the movie in theaters.

By: McCoy's Gall Bladder "I only use it for medicinal purposes"

McCoy's Gall Bladder "I only use it for medicinal purposes" — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 08:57:07 +0000

Ok, I read Cameron’s quote about the film having a conscience and realized, that’s what GENE would have wanted…

Maybe this is the Star Trek movie we’re waiting for? Will the Shat be in it? Will he confront God?

Confused? You wont be after this episode of “SOAP”