


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Explore the Star Trek DVD/BD &#8216;Experience The Enterprise&#8217; Augmented Reality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2009/12/22/explore-the-experience-the-enterprise-augmented-reality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/12/22/explore-the-experience-the-enterprise-augmented-reality/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:35:08 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bobby</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/12/22/explore-the-experience-the-enterprise-augmented-reality/comment-page-2/#comment-2486402</link>
		<dc:creator>bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 04:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=9831#comment-2486402</guid>
		<description>imac</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>imac</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/12/22/explore-the-experience-the-enterprise-augmented-reality/comment-page-2/#comment-2427537</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 20:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=9831#comment-2427537</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s a best buy canada purchase if that makes any difference, and the laptop runs vista, windows 11 and should have more than enough power/capacity to run the programming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a best buy canada purchase if that makes any difference, and the laptop runs vista, windows 11 and should have more than enough power/capacity to run the programming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/12/22/explore-the-experience-the-enterprise-augmented-reality/comment-page-2/#comment-2427529</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 20:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=9831#comment-2427529</guid>
		<description>Can someone please help me with a slightly different problem.  just got 3-disc blue ray edition.  Tried it on my laptop/blueray player (only blueray player I have and why I bought the laptop) and I can&#039;t play any of it.  I get absolutely nothing out of disc 1 and 2, and the digital copy only tells me to insert the disc into my blueray dvd-rom, which it already is.  The digital transfer option tells me my download code has already been used and is no longer valid.  It was a sealed box and I just opened it today!!!  Any assistance or advice would be appreciated before I get my rifle out.  I emailed the help desk that the disc sent me to and asked for a new code but now the help website just comes up blank.  I&#039;m gonna lose it....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone please help me with a slightly different problem.  just got 3-disc blue ray edition.  Tried it on my laptop/blueray player (only blueray player I have and why I bought the laptop) and I can&#8217;t play any of it.  I get absolutely nothing out of disc 1 and 2, and the digital copy only tells me to insert the disc into my blueray dvd-rom, which it already is.  The digital transfer option tells me my download code has already been used and is no longer valid.  It was a sealed box and I just opened it today!!!  Any assistance or advice would be appreciated before I get my rifle out.  I emailed the help desk that the disc sent me to and asked for a new code but now the help website just comes up blank.  I&#8217;m gonna lose it&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: "Check the Circuit!"</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/12/22/explore-the-experience-the-enterprise-augmented-reality/comment-page-2/#comment-2416402</link>
		<dc:creator>"Check the Circuit!"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 03:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=9831#comment-2416402</guid>
		<description>@46

Your last post won&#039;t get you called out as a hater just because you didn&#039;t like Engineering.  You laid out your concerns.  Added thoughtful ideas and a rationale.  It&#039;s a great example of social discourse.  That&#039;s what makes it fun to come to this site.

It&#039;s the attacks and hatred/dislike for any new approaches to Trek simply because they didn&#039;t fit into a very narrow idea of what TOS &quot;should&quot; be.  The Talifans and the &quot;canonistas&quot; who are belligerent and rigid make visits here distasteful.  And unfortunately they given the rest of Trek fans a bad reputation and make us fodder for the likes of The Onion.

I&#039;d like to think all ideas and opinions are welcome here...as long as they&#039;re delivered with respect and thoughtfulness.  Spirited debate on this site should make the 30+ months move along much more quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@46</p>
<p>Your last post won&#8217;t get you called out as a hater just because you didn&#8217;t like Engineering.  You laid out your concerns.  Added thoughtful ideas and a rationale.  It&#8217;s a great example of social discourse.  That&#8217;s what makes it fun to come to this site.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the attacks and hatred/dislike for any new approaches to Trek simply because they didn&#8217;t fit into a very narrow idea of what TOS &#8220;should&#8221; be.  The Talifans and the &#8220;canonistas&#8221; who are belligerent and rigid make visits here distasteful.  And unfortunately they given the rest of Trek fans a bad reputation and make us fodder for the likes of The Onion.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to think all ideas and opinions are welcome here&#8230;as long as they&#8217;re delivered with respect and thoughtfulness.  Spirited debate on this site should make the 30+ months move along much more quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herb</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/12/22/explore-the-experience-the-enterprise-augmented-reality/comment-page-2/#comment-2411873</link>
		<dc:creator>Herb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 23:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=9831#comment-2411873</guid>
		<description>I tried the 3D webcam thing on a PC laptop with XP using an older IE, Google chrome, and Firefox, nd could not get it to work at all.  Got an error every time.  

I finally got it to work on our Mac desktop under Safari, no problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried the 3D webcam thing on a PC laptop with XP using an older IE, Google chrome, and Firefox, nd could not get it to work at all.  Got an error every time.  </p>
<p>I finally got it to work on our Mac desktop under Safari, no problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryanhuyton</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/12/22/explore-the-experience-the-enterprise-augmented-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-2410583</link>
		<dc:creator>ryanhuyton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 06:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=9831#comment-2410583</guid>
		<description>#48 I agree with you on the engineering/brewery. However, J.J Abrams had to choose between a new set or visual and special effects. He chose the latter. At least not a whole lot of scenes were spent in the brewery. As for Uhura&#039;s bra, I would guess that undergarments wouldn&#039;t need to change much because it really hasn&#039;t for centuries. Sure, little things like fabric and patterns, but other than that the principle remains the same and probably would in the 23rd century. On the other hand, George Lucas felt women don&#039;t wear bras in the &quot;Star Wars&quot; universe and that is why Carrie Fisher didn&#039;t wear one(as far as I know, since it was she who said it) in the first movie.Anyway, Uhura was hot in her underwear so it doesn&#039;t really matter.

As for the 3d thing, I haven&#039;t tried it and don&#039;t think I will. I have the Starship Simulator on the Blu Ray anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#48 I agree with you on the engineering/brewery. However, J.J Abrams had to choose between a new set or visual and special effects. He chose the latter. At least not a whole lot of scenes were spent in the brewery. As for Uhura&#8217;s bra, I would guess that undergarments wouldn&#8217;t need to change much because it really hasn&#8217;t for centuries. Sure, little things like fabric and patterns, but other than that the principle remains the same and probably would in the 23rd century. On the other hand, George Lucas felt women don&#8217;t wear bras in the &#8220;Star Wars&#8221; universe and that is why Carrie Fisher didn&#8217;t wear one(as far as I know, since it was she who said it) in the first movie.Anyway, Uhura was hot in her underwear so it doesn&#8217;t really matter.</p>
<p>As for the 3d thing, I haven&#8217;t tried it and don&#8217;t think I will. I have the Starship Simulator on the Blu Ray anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotty</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/12/22/explore-the-experience-the-enterprise-augmented-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-2410344</link>
		<dc:creator>Scotty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 04:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=9831#comment-2410344</guid>
		<description>My beef with the beer factory engineering set is that it looked exactly like a beer factory. At no point did I think &#039;hmm that&#039;s an impressive engineering set that looks in no way like a beer factory&#039;.

I&#039;ve no problem with them shooting in one, but I wish it looked more like a starships engineering bay, and rather less like what it was. And I think most other people feel this way too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My beef with the beer factory engineering set is that it looked exactly like a beer factory. At no point did I think &#8216;hmm that&#8217;s an impressive engineering set that looks in no way like a beer factory&#8217;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve no problem with them shooting in one, but I wish it looked more like a starships engineering bay, and rather less like what it was. And I think most other people feel this way too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khan was framed!</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/12/22/explore-the-experience-the-enterprise-augmented-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-2409503</link>
		<dc:creator>Khan was framed!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 20:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=9831#comment-2409503</guid>
		<description>These games are lame!

I&#039;ve seen the GI Joe one too, it&#039;s a cute trick but rather pointless.

As for the brewery sets; they looks like.... a brewery. 

The lower decks sucked in this movie, they did no look like parts of a starship, they looked like 20th century industrial facilities.

Those of you who argue that they can look like anything they want cause they&#039;re fictional would be right if Trek was new, but it&#039;s not it&#039;s a 44 year old, well established franchise with established dogma in relation to things like warp engines, Ship construction, etc.

These are elements of our mythology that  this movie arrogantly ignored or changed &amp; that is unforgivable.

It&#039;s like removing Batman&#039;s cape &amp; not explaining why.

JJ seems to be unable to think on the visionary scale of Rodenberry &amp; that&#039;s exactly why he was the wrong person to do this movie.

I mean does he actually think that rooms will still look like this in 200 years? 

Go visit a 200 year old building, is it the same as one made today?

Uhura&#039;s bra is no different than one off the shelf today; does JJ think underwear has been the same for centuries? Or that it won&#039;t change in the next 200 years? 

This movie&#039;s story was OK, the casting was pretty good, the alien make up design was great (excluding the deleted Gorn, WTF?). 

But it suffered from a tremendous lack of imagination &amp; simply wasn&#039;t good enough to justify this many changes.

The view screen is just a big window?! 

Come on, man!!

Think ahead, not current.

I hope there&#039;s some significant changes in art direction for the sequel, at least in those engine rooms, please!

&amp; make the dialogue match the CG, if Scotty ejects the warp core, show the core ejecting, not the antimatter pods, they are two different things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These games are lame!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen the GI Joe one too, it&#8217;s a cute trick but rather pointless.</p>
<p>As for the brewery sets; they looks like&#8230;. a brewery. </p>
<p>The lower decks sucked in this movie, they did no look like parts of a starship, they looked like 20th century industrial facilities.</p>
<p>Those of you who argue that they can look like anything they want cause they&#8217;re fictional would be right if Trek was new, but it&#8217;s not it&#8217;s a 44 year old, well established franchise with established dogma in relation to things like warp engines, Ship construction, etc.</p>
<p>These are elements of our mythology that  this movie arrogantly ignored or changed &amp; that is unforgivable.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like removing Batman&#8217;s cape &amp; not explaining why.</p>
<p>JJ seems to be unable to think on the visionary scale of Rodenberry &amp; that&#8217;s exactly why he was the wrong person to do this movie.</p>
<p>I mean does he actually think that rooms will still look like this in 200 years? </p>
<p>Go visit a 200 year old building, is it the same as one made today?</p>
<p>Uhura&#8217;s bra is no different than one off the shelf today; does JJ think underwear has been the same for centuries? Or that it won&#8217;t change in the next 200 years? </p>
<p>This movie&#8217;s story was OK, the casting was pretty good, the alien make up design was great (excluding the deleted Gorn, WTF?). </p>
<p>But it suffered from a tremendous lack of imagination &amp; simply wasn&#8217;t good enough to justify this many changes.</p>
<p>The view screen is just a big window?! </p>
<p>Come on, man!!</p>
<p>Think ahead, not current.</p>
<p>I hope there&#8217;s some significant changes in art direction for the sequel, at least in those engine rooms, please!</p>
<p>&amp; make the dialogue match the CG, if Scotty ejects the warp core, show the core ejecting, not the antimatter pods, they are two different things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DarthDogg</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/12/22/explore-the-experience-the-enterprise-augmented-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-2409482</link>
		<dc:creator>DarthDogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 19:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=9831#comment-2409482</guid>
		<description>as someone who loves the movie but hates the brewery set, I would be interested in hearing from someone who loves the brewery set on exactly WHY they love it. We have all heard the reasons why it is hated ( Looks like a brewery, doesnt fit in the ship, The old engineering rooms look better and more functional). I have never heard anyone say why it is good. Please, Im very curious</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as someone who loves the movie but hates the brewery set, I would be interested in hearing from someone who loves the brewery set on exactly WHY they love it. We have all heard the reasons why it is hated ( Looks like a brewery, doesnt fit in the ship, The old engineering rooms look better and more functional). I have never heard anyone say why it is good. Please, Im very curious</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desstruxion</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/12/22/explore-the-experience-the-enterprise-augmented-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-2409374</link>
		<dc:creator>Desstruxion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 17:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=9831#comment-2409374</guid>
		<description>Ok #45 maybe you have a point.  &quot;Sucked&quot; may have been a little rude.  I do still say however that the &quot;engineering&quot; area should have looked like an engineering area with the warp core as the center piece.  If Scottie hadnt been in that area during his &quot;I&#039;m givin it all she&#039;s got&quot; dialogue we could have assumed that he was in the shuttle bay or any other area in the guts of the ship.  It all looked the same.  As far as &quot;re-invigorating&quot; the franchise goes, as others have suggested, for lifelong fans it&#039;s as invigorating as it was the first time we saw it.  There&#039;s no reason the sets couldnt have been somewhat true to the original and the action and storyline still be there for the new fans.  I loved this movie as I&#039;ve said over and over again and I&#039;ll take my Trek in any form that I can get it, but for some reason anytime someone tries to speculate what might have been (which the ficional universe of Star Trek has always done) others get threatened and lash out.  I enjoy other opinions.  If you liked the brewery set then great but don&#039;t get all uptight when others do not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok #45 maybe you have a point.  &#8220;Sucked&#8221; may have been a little rude.  I do still say however that the &#8220;engineering&#8221; area should have looked like an engineering area with the warp core as the center piece.  If Scottie hadnt been in that area during his &#8220;I&#8217;m givin it all she&#8217;s got&#8221; dialogue we could have assumed that he was in the shuttle bay or any other area in the guts of the ship.  It all looked the same.  As far as &#8220;re-invigorating&#8221; the franchise goes, as others have suggested, for lifelong fans it&#8217;s as invigorating as it was the first time we saw it.  There&#8217;s no reason the sets couldnt have been somewhat true to the original and the action and storyline still be there for the new fans.  I loved this movie as I&#8217;ve said over and over again and I&#8217;ll take my Trek in any form that I can get it, but for some reason anytime someone tries to speculate what might have been (which the ficional universe of Star Trek has always done) others get threatened and lash out.  I enjoy other opinions.  If you liked the brewery set then great but don&#8217;t get all uptight when others do not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

