


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VOY@15: The Science of Star Trek Voyager</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2010/01/22/voy15-the-science-of-star-trek-voyager/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2010/01/22/voy15-the-science-of-star-trek-voyager/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:40:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sherriea</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2010/01/22/voy15-the-science-of-star-trek-voyager/comment-page-2/#comment-2857151</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherriea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 07:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=10608#comment-2857151</guid>
		<description>I am a 58 year young treky. As a teenager I watched the  airing of the original Star Trek. I loved  the shows. I also enjoy Voyager. Voyager really is the best sci -fi show I have seen. I feel  Captain Janeway and Captain Kirk  were so believable. Star Trek is responsible for my direction a long time ago in science studies.

 I  am surprised, though, that not even the lovable Mr. Spock could explain how the ships force fields worked. Can someone try explaining this system. I am also stressed that not one show attempted to explain how  artificial  gravity works.  Does not gravity have its origin and its affect through the actual fabric of space its self, as stated in Quantum Mechanics and String Theory?

Sherriea</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a 58 year young treky. As a teenager I watched the  airing of the original Star Trek. I loved  the shows. I also enjoy Voyager. Voyager really is the best sci -fi show I have seen. I feel  Captain Janeway and Captain Kirk  were so believable. Star Trek is responsible for my direction a long time ago in science studies.</p>
<p> I  am surprised, though, that not even the lovable Mr. Spock could explain how the ships force fields worked. Can someone try explaining this system. I am also stressed that not one show attempted to explain how  artificial  gravity works.  Does not gravity have its origin and its affect through the actual fabric of space its self, as stated in Quantum Mechanics and String Theory?</p>
<p>Sherriea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Gnandt</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2010/01/22/voy15-the-science-of-star-trek-voyager/comment-page-2/#comment-2854765</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gnandt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 19:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=10608#comment-2854765</guid>
		<description>Star Trek: Voyager was my least favorite of the five Star Trek series. However, from a standpoint of techno-babble and fictional science I have to admit it was probably the best. I like the holographic doctor. I&#039;d love to have a holographic doctor. That way if he or she was going to give you some bad news you didn&#039;t want to hear you could just turn them off!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Star Trek: Voyager was my least favorite of the five Star Trek series. However, from a standpoint of techno-babble and fictional science I have to admit it was probably the best. I like the holographic doctor. I&#8217;d love to have a holographic doctor. That way if he or she was going to give you some bad news you didn&#8217;t want to hear you could just turn them off!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Bennett</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2010/01/22/voy15-the-science-of-star-trek-voyager/comment-page-2/#comment-2477263</link>
		<dc:creator>James Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=10608#comment-2477263</guid>
		<description>Would all of you quit worrying if things are possible or plausible or not. It is science fiction. It gives us something to dream about and maybe, just maybe someday acheive. There have been sceptics in every century since the dawn of man. Lets those who dream and create do what they do best, and not throw ever little negative thing out there at them. The world is not flat, let them prove warp drive and eat you words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would all of you quit worrying if things are possible or plausible or not. It is science fiction. It gives us something to dream about and maybe, just maybe someday acheive. There have been sceptics in every century since the dawn of man. Lets those who dream and create do what they do best, and not throw ever little negative thing out there at them. The world is not flat, let them prove warp drive and eat you words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryanhuyton</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2010/01/22/voy15-the-science-of-star-trek-voyager/comment-page-2/#comment-2474318</link>
		<dc:creator>ryanhuyton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=10608#comment-2474318</guid>
		<description>#55 That was the main problem with the show. For a ship supposedly lost in the other side of the galaxy, the Voyager always seemed to never run out of anti-matter, torpedoes, or shuttlecraft. And it returned to Earth in the same pristine condition in which it left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#55 That was the main problem with the show. For a ship supposedly lost in the other side of the galaxy, the Voyager always seemed to never run out of anti-matter, torpedoes, or shuttlecraft. And it returned to Earth in the same pristine condition in which it left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colonel West</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2010/01/22/voy15-the-science-of-star-trek-voyager/comment-page-2/#comment-2474310</link>
		<dc:creator>Colonel West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=10608#comment-2474310</guid>
		<description>Great stuff Rick as always and good to see their still putting you to good use! 

All I have to add apart from that is:

&quot;Get that cheese to Sickbay....!&quot;

*Ahem*
:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff Rick as always and good to see their still putting you to good use! </p>
<p>All I have to add apart from that is:</p>
<p>&#8220;Get that cheese to Sickbay&#8230;.!&#8221;</p>
<p>*Ahem*<br />
:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2010/01/22/voy15-the-science-of-star-trek-voyager/comment-page-2/#comment-2474304</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=10608#comment-2474304</guid>
		<description>You wanna know what Voyager technology I really wanna see is?

The super duper replicator that all those shuttles and photon torpedoes came from on a ship with limited resources. They must of had those bussard collectors working overtime to keep the deuterium tanks full and the fusion reactors powered up to keep the replicators going and the holodecks running all the time! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wanna know what Voyager technology I really wanna see is?</p>
<p>The super duper replicator that all those shuttles and photon torpedoes came from on a ship with limited resources. They must of had those bussard collectors working overtime to keep the deuterium tanks full and the fusion reactors powered up to keep the replicators going and the holodecks running all the time! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oktoberfest</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2010/01/22/voy15-the-science-of-star-trek-voyager/comment-page-2/#comment-2474288</link>
		<dc:creator>Oktoberfest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=10608#comment-2474288</guid>
		<description>Voyager had the BEST speculative science, by far, of any Trek before or since. For me, that&#039;s &quot;Best&quot; in the sense of &quot;most entertaining and interesting&quot;. 

Obviously hits and misses are common to all speculation, but Voyager took those chances, damn the torpedoes. 

Every week, Voyager brought us an astounding array of fascinating science, such as: 

- A phage that degraded an entire space-faring species into desperate organ-hunters, pouring every ounce of R&amp;D into accelerating medical breakthroughs decades or centuries faster than normal 

- A violent, treacherous race of subspace tunnel builders 

- A temporal bubble that housed an entire civilization, where centuries to them passed as hours to us, and an in-orbit high albedo USS Voyager becomes their deity 

- Centuries in the future, a museum in the Delta Quadrant relates to us a &quot;faulty history&quot; of their encounter with Voyager 

Not only that, Voyager frequently explored the &quot;nature of the soul&quot;, philosophy, and religion. All in all, the writers took Trek to a place where everything under the sun could be explored. 

Voyager gave us great ideas that were explored from different angles by characters inside each episode, not just thrown around as plot points to get to the next action sequence. Many of Voyager&#039;s ideas are interesting to discuss fifteen years later. 

I still consider Voyager to be the 4th best Trek series (TOS, TNG, DS9) overall, but in a lot of ways, comparing STV to the others is apples/oranges. I&#039;d put 20 episodes of STV up against any list of great TV scifi, not just Trek. 

Outstanding article, thank you. 

PS: At this point, because we live in &quot;The Age of the Reboot&quot;, I&#039;d like to cast my vote for Star Trek: Voyager. Imagine a BSG-like series in which two disparate factions that hate each other are forced to serve together in an entirely unexplored area of space, where crew suffers great loss and every week the ship becomes a battered, dirty, grungy and increasingly uninhabitable hulk. Federation principles are bent and broken as highly questionable and unethical methods are required to survive. In some ways, I kind of wish that the crew of USS Voyager was more like the crew of the ill-fated USS Equinox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Voyager had the BEST speculative science, by far, of any Trek before or since. For me, that&#8217;s &#8220;Best&#8221; in the sense of &#8220;most entertaining and interesting&#8221;. </p>
<p>Obviously hits and misses are common to all speculation, but Voyager took those chances, damn the torpedoes. </p>
<p>Every week, Voyager brought us an astounding array of fascinating science, such as: </p>
<p>- A phage that degraded an entire space-faring species into desperate organ-hunters, pouring every ounce of R&amp;D into accelerating medical breakthroughs decades or centuries faster than normal </p>
<p>- A violent, treacherous race of subspace tunnel builders </p>
<p>- A temporal bubble that housed an entire civilization, where centuries to them passed as hours to us, and an in-orbit high albedo USS Voyager becomes their deity </p>
<p>- Centuries in the future, a museum in the Delta Quadrant relates to us a &#8220;faulty history&#8221; of their encounter with Voyager </p>
<p>Not only that, Voyager frequently explored the &#8220;nature of the soul&#8221;, philosophy, and religion. All in all, the writers took Trek to a place where everything under the sun could be explored. </p>
<p>Voyager gave us great ideas that were explored from different angles by characters inside each episode, not just thrown around as plot points to get to the next action sequence. Many of Voyager&#8217;s ideas are interesting to discuss fifteen years later. </p>
<p>I still consider Voyager to be the 4th best Trek series (TOS, TNG, DS9) overall, but in a lot of ways, comparing STV to the others is apples/oranges. I&#8217;d put 20 episodes of STV up against any list of great TV scifi, not just Trek. </p>
<p>Outstanding article, thank you. </p>
<p>PS: At this point, because we live in &#8220;The Age of the Reboot&#8221;, I&#8217;d like to cast my vote for Star Trek: Voyager. Imagine a BSG-like series in which two disparate factions that hate each other are forced to serve together in an entirely unexplored area of space, where crew suffers great loss and every week the ship becomes a battered, dirty, grungy and increasingly uninhabitable hulk. Federation principles are bent and broken as highly questionable and unethical methods are required to survive. In some ways, I kind of wish that the crew of USS Voyager was more like the crew of the ill-fated USS Equinox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryanhuyton</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2010/01/22/voy15-the-science-of-star-trek-voyager/comment-page-2/#comment-2474254</link>
		<dc:creator>ryanhuyton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=10608#comment-2474254</guid>
		<description>Rick, I loved your work on TNG,DS9,VOY,etc. The TNG tech manual was great, but the DS9 book was even better. The great thing about Trek is all the ideas that it presents. Hopefully you get a call from J.J Abrams on how an engineering room should look like.

A question: What do you feel was your greatest and or favorite contribution to any of the series?

I really enjoyed your work and have a tough time deciding which things stand out for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick, I loved your work on TNG,DS9,VOY,etc. The TNG tech manual was great, but the DS9 book was even better. The great thing about Trek is all the ideas that it presents. Hopefully you get a call from J.J Abrams on how an engineering room should look like.</p>
<p>A question: What do you feel was your greatest and or favorite contribution to any of the series?</p>
<p>I really enjoyed your work and have a tough time deciding which things stand out for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Disinvited</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2010/01/22/voy15-the-science-of-star-trek-voyager/comment-page-2/#comment-2474189</link>
		<dc:creator>The Disinvited</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=10608#comment-2474189</guid>
		<description>#15. Schultz

Having been present at some of the first demonstrations of ruby laser holograms I think I can shed some light.

First, your idea that somehow such holographic images must involve conventional theater projection is a misnomer. The light scattering produced in such holographic images are caused by interference patterns of colliding waves of light and are perfectly visible in a vacuum. And that is not the only mechanism of optics capable of producing a 3-D image in such a setting. Just as the mirrors of Hubble work fine in space so would a conventional 3-D imaging spherical mirror using conventional optics, that you could purchase at at most magic shops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#15. Schultz</p>
<p>Having been present at some of the first demonstrations of ruby laser holograms I think I can shed some light.</p>
<p>First, your idea that somehow such holographic images must involve conventional theater projection is a misnomer. The light scattering produced in such holographic images are caused by interference patterns of colliding waves of light and are perfectly visible in a vacuum. And that is not the only mechanism of optics capable of producing a 3-D image in such a setting. Just as the mirrors of Hubble work fine in space so would a conventional 3-D imaging spherical mirror using conventional optics, that you could purchase at at most magic shops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Sternbach</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2010/01/22/voy15-the-science-of-star-trek-voyager/comment-page-2/#comment-2474185</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Sternbach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/?p=10608#comment-2474185</guid>
		<description>#47 - Well, the way we described the process in the TNG manual (and here in the last few messages), you stay you, there are no copies, and you&#039;re not converted into energy. You&#039;re safe. :)

For an interesting story that does have some transporter-like complications, see Christopher Nolan&#039;s THE PRESTIGE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#47 &#8211; Well, the way we described the process in the TNG manual (and here in the last few messages), you stay you, there are no copies, and you&#8217;re not converted into energy. You&#8217;re safe. :)</p>
<p>For an interesting story that does have some transporter-like complications, see Christopher Nolan&#8217;s THE PRESTIGE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

