Comments on: Patrick Stewart Interested In Appearing In Star Trek Sequel + Mad Max 4 Rumor + more from PS in OZ

By: Adam

Adam — Sat, 23 Apr 2011 13:51:46 +0000

star trek was about kirk and spock ? which was the highest grossing series……..kirk and spocks star trek was almost like a pilot the enterprise peaked with tng but unfortunately some of the films made about tng let the whole thing down. jj abrams is a great director.

what i and everyone has always been waiting for is a film with an all out armada style battle like the one in ds9 when they fight off the founders and just as they think they’ve lost out of nowhere come the kllingons, amazing :)

By: Trojan

Trojan — Fri, 08 Apr 2011 18:38:02 +0000

Abrams had not seen Star Trek Nemesis because the franchise had “disconnected” for him,[66] explaining that for him, Star Trek was about Kirk and Spock, and the other series were like “separate space adventure[s] with the name Star Trek

By: Joseph E Gutshall

Joseph E Gutshall — Tue, 11 Jan 2011 01:49:10 +0000

We need Patrick back and spock just one more time to give some wisdom to next crew. Just one more time, please??

By: Disinvited

Disinvited — Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:43:43 +0000

#104.

What is it about the dealer’s room that the fictional Picard finds to his disliking?

By: let me hear your war cry

let me hear your war cry — Thu, 12 Aug 2010 21:39:24 +0000

tok ock eechaaa tika neee FOCK TA JAA In klingon this means The PIcard doesnt like any of you traders of the StarShip Enterprise

By: Daniel enterprise

Daniel enterprise — Thu, 12 Aug 2010 08:09:01 +0000

Picard is the best capt. for the any roll in any new movies that are coming, in fact I wish there would be many more Trek adventures with Picard ….series or movie doesnt matter as long as you dont wait till its too late!!….
Enok Tah!! E chuu ack….
my fellow bretheren till we meet on the enterprise again end hail transmision…………..

By: RJ

RJ — Wed, 02 Jun 2010 14:50:08 +0000

Honestly I would love to see them work in Q, lol.

By: Alejandro

Alejandro — Sun, 02 May 2010 00:52:13 +0000

Jonathan Archer is the only captain I see making sense with the new timeline. T’Pol and T’Pau would probably also be alive, along with maybe Phlox and some other Enterprise characters. Now, would the general audience like it? Would they recognize the characters? I think they would. You’d be surprised how many people (non-trekkies or ST fans) know about “Bakula’s Star Trek show”… And anyways, both Stewart and Shatner have been in many movies, don’t you think Bakula deserves at least a 5 minute scene in a Star Trek movie??

By: Mike D

Mike D — Tue, 13 Apr 2010 22:59:23 +0000

No shat, no cameos and no JJ!!!! sorry JJ you made a great Star Wars film with Star Trek names. Take your shakey camera and LSD inflicted lens flares back to that little island used in lost and stay there. Never set foot on a trek stage again.
Now, lets see the return of DC Fontana writing trek plots. Maybe a REAL TNG VOY and DS9 send off and farewell. Star Trek has always been about moving forward and the future. Going back 100 odd years was against Gene’s vision in my opinion. Lets see a Titan series, or a federation expedition into the gamma quadrant now the dominion is squashed. Or how about the borg go back in time to the 50’s (again) and prevent the conception of JJ Abrams, so humanity isnt tortured with Lost, Alias, Fringe, MI3, Cloverfield and Star Wars – sorry Star Trek. Then they go to vegas and get drunk and meet vic fontaine. Then the hilton take on a new residence act: Vic Fontaine and the Spacemen that runs for 30 years? This will then put Elvis out of the job and maybe confirm the suspicion that Elvis was infact abducted by aliens, (maybe Species 8472) and didnt die of burger related injuries.

By: BRIAN ROBERTS

BRIAN ROBERTS — Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:23:02 +0000

WE WHAT ANOTHER INTREPRIZES E MOVIE NOT A OLD ONE MAY BE WITH VOGAER