Sci-Fi Movies Tuesday: Alien, The Hobbit, Mad Max: Fury Road, Roger Rabbit, Spider-Man 4 + more

In this week’s Sci-Fi Movies, we’ve got news about Ridley Scott’s Alien prequel, confirmation of the casting of Charlize Theron and Tom Hardy in Mad Max: Fury Road, Robert Zemeckis talking about his Who Framed Roger Rabbit sequel and more, including the latest box office numbers, casting bites, images and videos.

GENRE MOVIE NEWS

Ridley Scott Talks About His Alien Prequel
Ridley Scott spoke with Empire about the proposed "Alien" prequel film he’ll be directing, which he says will be a good deal detached — at least timeline wise — from his 1979 original:

"It’s a brand new box of tricks," said Sir Ridley. "We know what the road map is, and the screenplay is now being put on paper. The prequel will be a while ago. It’s very difficult to put a year on Alien, but [for example] if Alien was towards the end of this century, then the prequel story will take place thirty years prior."

John Rhys-Davies Says No — For Now — To The Hobbit + Ian McKellen Has Read the Script
John Rhys-Davies (who played Gimli the dwarf in "The Lord of the Rings" trilogy) would seem to be the perfect fit to play Gimli’s father Gloin in "The Hobbit", but the actor told Empire that he has already been approached about the role and has turned it down; as well as any small cameos:

"I’ve already been asked and to be honest with you, I wouldn’t. I have already completely ruled it out. There’s a sentimental part of me that would love to be involved again. Really I am not sure my face can take that sort of punishment any more."

"Why would you want to do it if it was just a couple of shots? When you’ve been 1 of 1, why would you want to be 1 of 13?"

However, Davies says he would consider returning if he was offered another role, one which would offer him the ability to create "a different type of persona within [the universe]":

"I’d really prefer to play something quite different. Maybe an Elf. They’ve got a different set of problems with The Hobbit because you’ve got 13 dwarves, a whole band of them… You’re trying to represent a whole race… You’re trying to do for dwarves what The Lord of the Rings did for hobbits."

Meanwhile, Ian McKellen, who is returning to the franchise — reprising his role as Gandalf the wizard — told SCI FI Wire that he has read the scripts for "The Hobbit" and its sequel.  McKellen offered no specifics, but did offer some thoughts about the project:

"As Peter has said, they loved writing Gandalf [for The Hobbit] because they knew who they were writing him for," McKellen said. "There are a lot of characters in The Hobbit, including, crucially, Bilbo, and they don’t know who’s going to play Bilbo. So it’s extremely attractive that this part has been written for me. The other Gandalf was written for, well, just as Gandalf. There’s lots for me to enjoy, in all sorts of ways. And I couldn’t be happier. But I’m sworn to secrecy. I’m not to say anything at all about the script."

As well as some thoughts on director Guillermo del Toro’s input on the script:

"They [Del Toro and Peter Jackson] are the same person," he said. "They were separated at birth. They’re twins. They have the same attitude. Neither likes working in Hollywood. They’re both fascinated by fantasy and violence on the screen, and gore, and things that frighten you. They like going into the psyche. They’re both brilliant storytellers in very much the same way. And I think the script, because I have read it, plays very much to Guillermo’s strengths, as I’ve seen them. I have seen his other movies, and people act very well in them. So I think it’s all fine. And Peter will always be there."

"The Hobbit" is scheduled to hit theaters in December 2011, followed by its sequel in December 2012.

Charlize Theron and Tom Hardy Confirmed for Mad Max: Fury Road
The fourth installment in George Miller’s "Mad Max" franchise, titled "Fury Road", has found its main cast.  Last week it was reported that Charlize Theron and Tom Hardy would star in the film, and now those rumors have been confirmed:

Despite his long association with the fourth movie, Mel Gibson is not reprising his iconic role of Max Rockatansky, the hardened ex-cop in a future beset by gas shortages and marauding gangs.

That job goes to Hardy, the British-born actor who stole scenes as Handsome Bob in Guy Ritchie’s “RocknRolla.” (”RocknRolla” has proved to be a launch pad for Hardy, who booked a gig in Christopher Nolan’s “Inception” as well. He also starred in “Bronson.”)

Theron is playing the female lead.

According to THR, the movie takes place a short time after the events of the third film, 1985’s "Mad Max: Beyond Thunderdome".  Warner Bros. is eying a summer 2010 shoot.

Roger Rabbit Sequel Script Commissioned
The rumors can be laid to rest, Robert Zemeckis told MTV that a script is development for a sequel to his 1988 hit "Who Framed Roger Rabbit".  Scribes Peter Seaman and Jeffrey Price — who wrote the original — are writing the script for the sequel:

"There’s a script that’s being developed," he revealed, adding, "We’ve got the original writers that are working on it now — Seaman and Price."

Robert Zemeckis also talked about the look of the film, indicating to MTV that it will make use of 3D motion capture for background characters, but probably not for Roger and Jessica:

"All the other characters that [the cartoons] would sort of have fun with would be magnificent in performance capture technology," he explained.

"I wouldn’t use it for the cartoon characters, because I think they should stay two-dimensional because that’s what — I wouldn’t dimensonalize Roger," he said. "And I couldn’t dimensonalize Jessica even if I wanted to because she doesn’t have a nose. We wouldn’t want to give her a nose."

Joss Whedon Wants to Buy Terminator Rights
The rights to the "Terminator" franchise are being sold by Halcyon Company.  According to the Financial Times, the property has received interest from several studios including Sony Pictures who are said to be the leading contender (Sony held foreign rights to "Terminator Salvation" which grossed $380 million worldwide).  Summit Entertainment and Media Rights Capital are also said to be interested.  Joss Whedon has jokingly thrown his name into the mix:

Dear Sirs/Ma’ams,

I am Joss Whedon, the mastermind behind Titan A.E., Parenthood (not the movie) (or the new series) (or the one where ‘hood’ was capitalized ’cause it was a pun), and myriad other legendary tales. I have heard through the ‘grapevine’ that the Terminator franchise is for sale, and I am prepared to make a pre-emptive bid RIGHT NOW to wrap this dealio up. This is not a joke, this is not a scam, this is not available on TV. I will write a check TODAY for $10,000, and viola! Terminator off your hands.

No, you didn’t miscount. That’s four — FOUR! — zeroes after that one. That’s to show you I mean business. And I mean show business. Nikki Finke says the Terminator concept is played. Well, here’s what I have to say to Nikki Finke: you are a fine journalist and please don’t ever notice me. The Terminator story is as formative and important in our culture — and my pretend play — as any I can think of. It’s far from over. And before you Terminator-Owners (I have trouble remembering names) rush to cash that sweet cheque, let me give you a taste of what I could do with that franchise:

1) Terminator… of the Rings! Yeah, what if he time-travelled TOO far… back to when there was dragons and wizards? (I think it was the Dark Ages.) Hasta La Vista, Boramir! Cool, huh? "Now you gonna be Gandalf the Red!" RRRRIP! But then he totally helps, because he’s a cyborg and he doesn’t give a s#&% about the ring — it has no power over him! And he can carry it AND Frodo AND Sam AND f@%& up some orcs while he’s doing it. This stuff just comes to me. I mean it. (I will also offer $10,000 for the Lord of the Rings franchise).

2) More Glau. Hey. There’s a reason they’re called "Summer" movies.

3) Can you say… musical? Well don’t. Even I know that’s an awful idea.

4) Christian Bale’s John Connor will get a throat lozenge. This will also help his Batwork (ten grand for that franchise too, btw.)

5) More porn. John Connor never told Kyle Reese this, but his main objective in going to the past was to get some. What if there’s a lot of future-babies that have to be made? Cue wah-wah pedal guitar — and dollar signs!

6) The movies will stop getting less cool.

Okay. There’s more — this brain don’t quit! (though it has occasionally been fired) — but I think you get my drift. I really believe the Terminator franchise has only begun to plumb the depths of questioning the human condition during awesome stunts, and I’d like to shepherd it through the next phase. The money is there, but more importantly, the heart is there. But more importantly, money. Think about it. End this bloody bidding war before it begins, and put the Terminator in the hands of someone who watched the first one more than any other movie in college, including "Song of Norway" (no current franchise offer). Sincerely, Joss Whedon.

Deleted scene (Moon Bloodgood topless scene–potentially NSFW)

NEW IMAGES

Avatar

Stills [IGN and MarketSaw–more at AvatarMovie]

Russian posters/banners [Kinopoisk via SlashFilmclick to view more]

The Box

U.K. poster [Empire]

Daybreakers

Stills [MTV]

How to Train Your Dragon

Poster

Hunter Prey

Stills [io9]

Inception

Leonardo DiCaprio and Ellen Page on the set [more at Pacific Coast News via Nolan Fans]

Percy Jackson & The Olympians: The Lightning Thief

Poster

 

Sherlock Holmes

Poster [SCI FI Wire]

The Twilight Saga: Eclipse

Xavier Samuels as Riley Biers [David A. Slade via MTV]

The Twilight Saga: New Moon

Director Chris Weitz talking with Kristen Stewart on the set [MTV]

CASTING BITES

  • One name coming up as the potential lead in Warner Bros’ "Lobo" is Clancy Brown ("Highlander"), although the casting process hasn’t officially begun yet. [Mania]
  • Edward Furlong has been cast in "The Green Hornet", but co-writer/star Seth Rogen wouldn’t reveal what role he’s playing. [Movie Web]
  • Anthony Hopkins is in negotiations to play the Norse god Odin in Marvel Studios’ "Thor" (May 20, 2011). The film is being directed by Kenneth Branagh and stars Chris Hemsworth ("Star Trek"), Tom Hiddleston and Natalie Portman. [THR’s Heat Vision Blog]


NEW VIDEOS

Alice in Wonderland

Trailer #2

Avatar

Trailer #2

TV spot

Featurette

SFX comparison: Teaser and Trailer [via SlashFilm]

The Box

Clip

TV spot

Watch two more TV spots here and here

How to Train Your Dragon

Trailer #1

Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time

Trailer #1

The Road

Trailer #2

Shutter Island

Trailer #3

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen

Michael Bay talking about Transformer 3–Easter egg from the DVD/Blu-ray [via Transformers Live]

The Twilight Saga: New Moon

Featurette: "Wolf Pack"

Clip: "Bella’s Paper Cut" [via MTV]

MOVIE BITES

  • "Star Trek" director J.J. Abrams says he hasn’t been approached by Warner Bros. to do his version of "Superman" but looks back positively on the experience: "It was a very passionate character for me. As a kid growing up it meant a lot to me. It would be wonderful and fun to see that brought back. I don’t know what Warners is thinking or what their plan is. It would be a blast."  He also says his script that was reviewed and mostly panned by fans wasn’t the latest draft they had at the time. [MTV]
  • Writers Edward Kitsis and Adam Horowitz ("Tron Legacy") have been tapped by Universal Studios to write the script for the studio’s board game-to-film adaptation of "Ouija". [THR’s Heat Vision Blog]
  • Jackie Earle Haley — who takes on the iconic role of Freddy in "A Nightmare on Elm Street" — sees the film as "pretty much a remake, a re-envisioning of that first film". [SCI FI Wire]
  • Ahead of the release of "The Twilight Saga: New Moon" on November 20, 2009, Summit Entertainment is re-releasing "Twilight" back into theaters for one day only on November 19th. [Summit Entertainment]
  • Columbia Pictures has hired "Tropic Thunder" co-writer Etan Cohen to script "Men in Black 3".  Will Smith and Tommy Lee Jones aren’t attached yet, but Smith is expected to come on board.  Jones’ involvement is uncertain.  Sony is said to be eying a 2010 start date. [THR’s Risky Business Blog]
  • It may have taken more than eight decades to happen again, but Fritz Lang’s original cut of his 1927 classic "Metropolis" will screen at next year’s Berlin Film Festival.  The version includes 30 additional minutes of footage. [Variety]
  • J.R.R. Tolkien placed No. 5 on Forbes’ annual list of top-earning dead celebrities.  The author, best known for "The Hobbit" and "The Lord of the Rings", earned $50 million between October 2008 and October 2009. [Forbes via SCI FI Wire]
  • "Babylon 5" creator J. Michael Straczynski is teaming with Jerry Bruckheimer to adapt 2K Games’ 2005 videogame "Shattered Union". [Variety]
  • Several landmarks were destroyed in Roland Emmerich’s "2012", including the White House and the Sistine Chapel, but the director says he had to bypass destroying the Kaaba, the building at the Islamic holy site of Mecca: "Well, I wanted to do that, I have to admit," Emmerich says. "But my co-writer Harald said I will not have a fatwa on my head because of a movie."… [SCI FI Wire]
  • …In related news, select theaters screening the Sony film will feature D-BOX motion technology. [Reuters]
  • Production is expected to begin early next year on the adaptation of the comic book "Hack/Slash".  Casting is also expected soon. [Collider]
  • Producer Stephen L’Heureux revealed that "Sin City 2" will enter production at the end of 2010.  Like the original, the sequel will be co-directed by Robert Rodriguez and Frank Miller, but the project will be based on an original script by Miller.  L’Heureux also revealed Miller will follow-up the film with a big-screen version of his comic "Hard Boiled". [Mania]
  • Fox Home Entertainment is reportedly eying a December 29 DVD and Blu-ray release date for "Jennifer’s Body".  The film severely underperformed at the box office grossing just $18.7 million worldwide. [Video ETA via Shock Till You Drop]
  • In addition to a TV series, Mike Medavoy and FremantleMedia Enterprises are collaborating on a narrative 3D feature called "Dinosaurs Resurrected". [Variety]
  • Grindhouse Releasing plans to bring Sam Raimi’s 1981 horror classic "Evil Dead" back to theaters with midnight screenings across the U.S. and Canada. Dates will be announced at a later date. [GrindhouseReleasing.com]
  • "Parnormal Activity" was a solid #2 over the weekend, grossing $16.4 million and pushing its six week total to $84.6 million. [BOM]
  • DreamWorks Animation has no interest in a sequel to "Monsters Vs. Aliens": "I’d like to tell you there’s a perfectly rational, clear and easy answer as to why not, but there isn’t," Jeffrey Katzenberg, chief executive of DreamWorks Animation, said. [LA Times]
  • "Paranormal Activity" director Oren Peli’s next film is a small-budget sci-fi thriller called "Area 51", but the director is running into problems selling the film.  It reportedly cost $5 million to make — a fair bit more than the $10,000 or so price tag of "Paranormal Activity" — and bidding is starting at about $10 million for domestic rights (DreamWorks and Paramount paid 300,000 for "Paranormal Activity")… [NY Times]
  • …however, the success of "Paranormal Activity" may lead to movement on a true sequel to "The Blair Witch Project", one which would ignore the 2000 sequel: "With this whole Paranormal Activity thing, there’s a spotlight shining back on Blair. So the timing might be right. Who knows? We’ll see how it goes", said Daniel Myrick. "We’re at the step where we’re about to pitch to Lionsgate, which owns the movie rights now. It’s pretty much up to them. They can completely squash it or greenlight it," added co-creator Eduardo Sánchez. [EW and Toronto Star]
  • "The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnasuss" opened big in Italy, grossing a second place $2.7 million from only 227 theaters. Its $11,870 per screen average was the third highest for the year in the country. [Variety]
  • William Dafoe ("Spider-Man") says that early on he was a candidate to play Batman in Burton’s 1989 film: "Very early, they talked to me about playing Batman," Dafoe said. [MTV]
  • According to "Green Lantern" director Martin Campbell, the film will contain approximately 1,300 visual effects shots: "…it’s mind-blowing, quite honestly," Campbell said. [Empire Magazine via Coventry Telegraph]
  • "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" sold 7.5 million copies on DVD and Blu-ray during its first week, already becoming the top-selling home entertainment release of the year.  The title also became the best-selling Blu-ray release of the year with 1.2 million copies on the high-def format.  First day sales totaled 2 million (1.5 million on DVD and 500,000 on Blu-ray). [Home Media Magazine]
  • Production has begun on writer-director Matt Reeves’ ("Cloverfield") "Let Me In", the American remake of Tomas Alfredson’s Swedish vampire film "Let the Right One In" based on John Ajvide Lindqvist’s novel "Lat den Ratte Komma In". [Shock Till You Drop]
  • 20th Century Fox has launched a new website for James Cameron’s 3D sci-fi epic "Avatar".  The site is located at AvatarMovie.com.
  • Dan Aykroyd ("Ghostbusters") provided an update on Sony’s proposed third film "Ghostbusters III", noting that writers Gene Stupnitsky and Lee Eisenberg are currently "hacking out a first draft" and saying that although the project still isn’t officially a go, it’s the farthest along it has been years. [IGN]
  • In the past director Sam Raimi has hinted at the possibility of "Spider-Man 4" (May 6, 2011) having only one villain — a response to the villain-heavy "Spider-Man 3" — and now comes a report (which will should probably treat just as a rumor for now) that the film will feature The Lizard as the sole villain. [MarketSaw]


Follow Russ on his blog: Your Entertainment Now and on Twitter: Twitter.com/YourEntNow.

44 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

finally a sequel to sin city!

God I hope GREEN LANTERN dosen’t SUCK!

Roger Rabbit!! Cant wait. Sounds like they have the right people at the head of that production so far.

Wow, Joss is a genius.

(Nobody crucify me for saying this, but I find his vision of humanity in the future in Firefly far more realistic and compelling than Star Trek’s.)

I second that. ‘Green Lantern’ is an intruiging superhero and I’d hate to see it botched.

I continue to have high hopes for the upcoming ‘Green Hornet,’ but I am having huge amounts of anxiety over its production.

‘Avatar’ continues to look like a big question mark for me, and sadly I cannot say that much of what is on this list interests me a whole lot.

With all the great SF yet untapped in the literary world and to see a list of remakes, remakes, reboots and more continuation of business as usual in the SF Hollywood community is just plain sad.

Am still waiting anxiously for word on that Spielberg project WWC (grrr).

Way to go Tom Hardy! He did a good job with Shinzon. But don’t F-up Mad Max!! LOL

Star Trek DVD and BluRay sales will SMASH Transformers 2 sales simply by how many Trek fans need to add it to their collection. Not to mention new Trekkies.

Still excited about avatar… Really excited.

@5

Not that I disagree with you about Avatar (I don’t actually – it’s failed to capture my interest so far) but isn’t that a bit of a contradiction there? You say that you’re sad to see remakes, reboots, etc. but then single out the first major, big-budget *original* science fiction film since The Matrix (District 9 doesn’t count – it was low to medium budget)?

Again, I don’t disagree, but it looks like a bit of a contradiction to me.

Avatars plot—star trek ibsurrection should sue–we got a off world location with something the evil/tech govt wants from the natives to the point of wanting to relocate them, and one of them who experiences their world and people and decides to join up and fight for the natives against the govt-sound familiar? Avatar–

#6 I’ve actually been getting more into Tom Hardy’s films lately, and I think Mad Max should be in good hands. The only real way the ball is getting dropped there would be if George Miller pulls a Stuart Baird with dramatic direction of the storytelling, but seeing as it’s his baby – I doubt it.

Hardy’s charisma in ‘Bronson’ is so infectious! I think that if he’s given a little more time, we’re going to start seeing more if him in American film.

– 24thCRS!

#9: “You say that you’re sad to see remakes, reboots, etc. but then single out the first major, big-budget *original* science fiction film since The Matrix (District 9 doesn’t count – it was low to medium budget)?”

Explain please. I am not clear on what film you think I singled out.

Incidentally, I never had the opportunity to see ‘District 9.’ AND I was not a fan of the ‘Matrix’ trilogy.

#12: If I’m not mistaken, you were saying that *while* Avatar was a “big question mark”, all the other SF films coming out of Hollywood were remakes, etc. and that it would be a shame if Avatar turned out to be mediocre as well (since that would mean NO really great SF for the time being). #9 may have misinterpreted that as you lumping Avatar in with all the remakes (?).

Also, IMO the Matrix *Trilogy* was crap. The Matrix, on the other hand, was a great movie, spoiled only by its two sequels.

http://xkcd.com/566/

Let’s all hope they don’t screw up The Hobbit and Who Framed Rodger Rabbit 2. Doesn’t look like it yet, but then I didn’t know how bad Star Trek 11 was going to be until the first publicity shots arrived.
Very glad they cut that seen from Terminator 4, very pointless and not all worth making it R for.

@7:

Lying to oneself is lying… ;)

Transformers will be the top-seller this year. Period. No matter how good (or in this case how bad) a TREK movie would turn out.

I, a long time trek fan, who has all the DVDs and Blurays released so far, will NOT buy XI on Bluray nor DVD, simply because I did not like the movie.

I wonder if Ben Kingsley even remembers when he was an actor in good movies, instead of the Eurotrash Villain.

A sequel to Roger Rabbit after, what, 20+ years? I saw Charles Fleischer at DragonCon. He did not look well.

“Can you say… musical? Well don’t. Even I know that’s an awful idea.”
— too funny!!! Maybe it is time to do a Terminator spoof.

The Box = Stupid.

I seriously doubt from looking at the trailer that The Road is true to the book — which doesn’t really lend itself to upswells of music and positive Christian imagery. Whatever, I wouldn’t suggest anyone see that movie when they’re already having a bad day.

The Hobbit continues to look fun.

Mad Max 4? I dunno. Once you’ve had Tina Turner in a metal dress, all else is anticlimactic.

Anyway… good selection.

I would love Joss Whedon to take over TERMINATOR. It would definitley mean the Summer Glau would be in a movie, and I think he could take the Terminator story to a whole other level.

Also, I think it would be VERY SMART for Warner Bros to get JJ to direct a Superman movie. If he had a finished script, wht the heck are they waiting for???

Tom Hardy should play Captain Picard in the JJ Abrams TNG movie (summer 2024!)

Clancy Brown as Lobo? GENIUS!

Although my first thought was Vin Diesel…

“Avatar’s” trailer showed a storyline with dialogue so overdone, it pulled me out of enjoying the FX.

JC usually can do no wrong, but a great trailer should make us drool to see the film. So far hasn’t happened to me.

a L.I.E.N., or a “Let It Evolve Nearby” or whatever he’ll call the prequel to Alien could be very interesting. Especially if that large lumbering race that built the ship that the Aliens wiped out is involved in some manner. Why, you might even want to use James Cameron’s new Avatar technology to actually tell that story of these huge-size aliens.

@20 Yep… all I hear is a Gollum-like voice describing Avatar…

“oooooh…. purrrrrrty pictures…”

JC definitely is too close to “his pretty” to get that it’s missing a few things. Compelling story, believable creatures, etc. Looks too much like a nonsense alien from Bartlett’s Guide still. Still not looking “real” to me.

@10. Good call… “Avatarsurrection”.

…just saw G.I. Joe on disc… I think this movie got a bad rap…

I think G.I. Joe is better than Star Trek, definitely more believable…

…and Rachel Nichols is HOTT in black rubber!! =O

(her talents were wasted on Star Trek)

I don’t get why Transformers ROTF is already out on DVD but we still have a while to wait for Star Trek? Did ROTF come out AFTER Star Trek? What’s the deal?

For that Joss Whedon letter not being a joke, it was pretty funny!

Seriously, $10K for the rights to the Terminator franchise? Keep dreaming, Joss!! Good luck to ya.

(for the record, I still think it was a joke)

“”Spider-Man 4” (May 6, 2011) having only one villain — a response to the villain-heavy “Spider-Man 3″ — and now comes a report (which will should probably treat just as a rumor for now) that the film will feature The Lizard as the sole villain.”

Well duh,…that only makes sense. They’ve been teasing us with that for some time now. and talk about cinematic appeal. With today’s effects. Fuhgetabouit.

I’ll be there to watch Avatar. Damn skippy. It ‘aint sci-fi without stilted dialogue. The Avatar Featurette had some great visuals I had never seen before. I like the eye candy. That’s what the new Trek film was after all. And just like Trek, people are all over a storyline that they haven’t seen yet. But if it sucks, it sucks. We can only wait and see.

Shinzon is Mad Max? I dunno. I like the Mad Max flicks, and I have seen some of the cars that George Miller is putting together for the new movie. But Mel is pretty iconic. I guess it’s Australia’s version of Shatner in Trek. Sort of.

I got Transformers for my kids because they like giant robots. But I sat them down and had a good long talk about the two little racially stereotyped robots. Thanks a lot for that Bob, Alex and Bay.

I’ll probably wait for Blu-Ray to see “Avatar”. The live-action stuff looks interesting, but the CGI stuff looks completely uninteresting to me. If I want to watch fake CGI characters run around spouting corny dialogue, I’ll get an XBox 360.

First off, where are the true sci fi fans at? No one comments on the new Alien or Mad Max – to hell with all of these juvenile comic book movies. Since when did this crap become synonomous with sci fi?

The Alien prequel will no doubt be the best movie of next year. How will the story involve humans since the first encounter was in the first movie on LV 426? Maybe a pirate ship crash lands on the alien home world.

Avatar = lame. Reminds me of what Star Wars Ep. 1-3. Totally lame dialogue. “You’re not in Kansas anymore.” Probably the most cliche, overused line ever.

Let’s hope Mad Max gets back to the formula that made the Road Warrior the best apocalypse movie ever made with one of the greatest car chase scenes of all time. Get back to the road! That is exactly why Beyond Thunderdome flopped. And for God’s sakes, leave those stupid kids in the desert out of it.

#28

Did you see Moon or D9? Or Sunshine? Or Children of Men? All good, recent science fiction movies. The comic book movies and monster movies fall more into the category I call, with a broad, sweeping stroke, genre flicks.

As for Ridley Scott’s new Alien flick, I say leave humans out of it entirely. Make it completely about the chariot man and his ship and crew. And get back to the Geiger influenced design work.

And I realize that by recent, I’m talking about the last couple of years. It is science fiction, after all.

The new Avatar trailers are amazing. A lot more action-packed and intense than the first one and the CGI looks spectacularly better.

I love you, James Cameron! YOU and THE NEXT GENERATION have been my truest connection to a sci-fi genre that can free and excite me in so many ways, but which is too often treated like garbage. It’s been a while since I’ve had faith in sci-fi again.

I got a chill watching that trailer. It reminds me of the very BEST episodes of Transformers I saw as a kid, which took my breath away and made me think for years — and still does. There was this wonderful realm hidden away somewhere and housing some very beautiful and loving creatures, and one day the decepticons found it and wanted to use and abuse the heck out of it. I remember, the autobots and decepticons went to war over this place and the decepticons were driven away.

I remember the final scene, with one of the autobots (I think he was reddish in colour?) sitting by a stream in sadness. And another bot comes over and says, “Don’t be so glum, we won!” And the first autobot, sort of looks around at the scorched earth and the destruction that has been reaped upon that beautiful realm and he says drearily, “Yeah. We won.” like he doesn’t even believe it. I can feel that moment coming in Avatar. That same feeling, each time a tree falls… Amazing.

#13: LOL … That’s not exactly what I was saying, but your explanation sounded good.

Actually, my main point was that Hollywood doesn’t take enough chances with real science fiction… and that most of the titles on this subject posting are all remakes or retreads, ‘Alien’ included. It’s too bad, because I think most filmed SF is extremely derivative.

It is a crime (to me) that some of the great science fiction novels such as ‘Childhood’s End, Rendevous with Rama, The Gentle Giants of Ganymede (and its sequels), Foundation Trilogy, The War Against the Chtorr, The Forever War,’ to name but a few have never been made into films.

Instead we get junk movies like ‘Men in Black, Surrogates, Riddick,’ etc…. or ones with lots of pretty vampires… and I could go on, but why bother?

As to ‘Avatar’ being a question mark, it comes down to the fact that I don’t know enough about it to base any judgments on whether it looks interesting to me or not. The trailers seem intriuging but the CG effects do seem to be where the movie will succeed or not. Generally speaking, I do enjoy Cameron’s work, so I am hopeful.

Personally, I am not a big fan of CGI, expecially when visualizing spacecraft. I realize it has its place, but overall I feel the technology is over-used and not quite *there* on photo-realism.

A few postings here have rightfully indicated that the superhero genre is not really science fiction. That said, I enjoy the escapism fare, especially the ‘X-Men’ franchise.

And while I do grouse about remakes, I do think a few are worthy of it… I’d like to see a remake of ‘Time Tunnel’ or as anyone who reads this site knows, I have been long advocating that Steven Spielberg follow through with his announced remake of the classic novel/movie ‘When Worlds Collide.’ Heck, I’d even welcome an intelligent retelling of ‘Logan’s Run.’

My main complaint is that remakes are easier to do, most often botched up, don’t live up to expectations and then ruin our chances of Hollywood risking money on something new and original.

What I don’t want, however, is retelling old classics just because we can… the remake of ‘The Day the Earth Stood Still,’ one of my all-time favorite SF classics, was a horrible,horrible mistake, and I fear that retelling ‘Forbidden Planet– if it is indeed ever remade– is also a big mistake! The big question about remakes is… why?

Please, Hollywood, give us something new!

Is that topless scene that almost made T4 get an R rating or something? Geee, talk about overreaction…

Looking forward to Mad Max: Fury Road. The film’s been in the offing for a decade, nearly been an anime project and now, finally, we get a new film with a young actor playing the role meaning sequels are a possibility.

Tom Hardy, after the embarrassment of Shinzon (thankfully Nemesis tanked in part because people didn’t bother to watch it!) has emerged as a really good actor and, given films like Bronson, should be able to knock this one out of the park! Charize Theron is also very likeable and is a damn fine actress. Ironically, a revived Aussie film franchise starring two non-Aussies might give us the best, most intelligent sci-fi action film in years.

That and, hopefully, Ridley Scott’s new Alien film will give us something to look forward to.

Oh and hurry up and release the Mel Gibson trilogy on Blu-ray please!

Two words: More Glau.
Tom Hardy?? Hoping for Sam Worthington.

28… Only the first two “Alien” movies were good. “Alien 3” in particular was a travesty, undoing the ending of the great second movie in a couple of minutes of screen time at the beginning. “Alien Resurrection” was totally forgettable, and don’t get me started on the “Alien vs. Predator” junk movies.

Sorry, absolutely no interest in “Mad Max”, past, present, or future.

#29:

I did see those movies. You make a good point about comic movies being genre flicks. For the most part, all of them are idiotic mindless pop crap for the masses. They have totally saturated the market and I don’t think the same space should be devoted to true sci fi as that family-friendly drivel.

As for Alien, absolutely get back to the original Geiger vision. That is the whole reason the series fell apart. Some of that original art that Geiger pioneered would be incredible to see on film. For the new movie, I expect less cgi and more dark imagery. No human actors? I don’t see how they could pull that off. Without any real characters to identify with (i.e. ripley, hicks, bishop) it would fall flat.

#37:

I totally disagree. Alien 3 was a masterpiece. The acting and dialogue are bar-none. And it was an original story with a new approach with the whole prison planet, no weapons. Brilliant. What did you expect? Some more over-the-top marine action? More guns, more tough guys? It would have ended up like Transformers 2. Did you think they could have pulled off the same great screen play with Hicks, Ripley, and Newt again? Not a chance. With the movie coming out 5 years later, they would have needed a different actor to play Newt anyway. It was a smart move to kill them off.

@22

” …just saw G.I. Joe on disc… I think this movie got a bad rap…

I think G.I. Joe is better than Star Trek, definitely more believable…

…and Rachel Nichols is HOTT in black rubber!! =O

(her talents were wasted on Star Trek)”

Please, tell me you’re speaking in satire here. That film (G.I. Joe) was a POS from frame one.

@38

Even Fincher will tell you that Alien 3 was a trainwreck, from the massive numbers of re-writes and writers who had their hands in it, to the production problems and keys moving in and out. The very fact that it’s as watchable as it is is due to Fincher’s work. Don’t get me wrong, it’s got a LOT of problems, but it’s still an OK movie. Now Alien Ressurection? That’s another POS, like “joe” was, though deep down I don’t really blame Joss, I blame the producers and the director.

Alien and Aliens are classics, no question and should be respected as such.

As for AVATAR, all I can tell you folks it just wait and see it in 3D (preferrably IMAX). This film will change the industry.

CE

G.I. Joe is definitely not high art, but it’s not as bad as it was made out to be.

…and yes, it is better than ST09 as a whole, IMHO.

…even if you look at G.I. Joe as a Star Trek movie, it’s better.

…just my opinion, let’s not start a whole “thing” here…

39. colonyearth:

I love Alien 3. Yes, it’s a ‘trainwreck’ because it’s not what anyone involved planned, but I think it’s a wonderful, dark sci-fi film with some stunning performances from the likes of Sigourney Weaver and Charles Dutton. What it isn’t is another gung-ho, militaristic James Cameron-fest.

The film is utterly uncommercial. It takes the hollow, upbeat ending of Aliens and brutally dashes it on the rocks. It’s a daring decision and generally works. Unfortunately, Sigourney Weaver had come to be seen as the focus of the series and Ripley’s death killed the franchise. Love all the British swearing though! ;)

I agree that, if you want a real trainwreck of a film, look at Alien Resurrection. Now that’s an abysmal piece of work. Most of the time it looks like a TV movie, its script is shocking (yet again, Joss Whedon proves he can’t write for other directors) the performances are all over the shop and it ends with a stupid hybrid Alien bursting out of the Alien Queen’s womb like a stripper bursting out of a cardboard birthday cake!

‘Alien 3’ and the animated ‘Galaxy Express’ are the only two movies I have ever walked out of a theater away from. With ‘Galaxy Express’ my friends and I made fun of it until we were appalled enough, and with ‘Alien 3’ I must say I was pissed off about it. What utter, pointless drek.

Upon further reading above…

Yeah, I too have the same complaint about Hollywood dredging up the classics. Never saw ‘TDTESS’ remake, and from what I heard it’s just as well.

‘Forbidden Planet’ has the distinction of being a film that actually managed to scare the crap out of me when I saw it for the first time, and I wasn’t a young ‘un. Don’t remake it.

What’s next? Re-make ‘STAR WARS’? ‘CE3K’? ‘2001’? ‘Silent Running’ (oh, don’t give them any ideas!!!)?

For crying out loud – Morgan Freeman has been hoping to get a ‘Rama’ movie off the ground, but no. And what about ‘Ringworld’? Is ‘Honor Harrington’ really going to be made? Hell, I’d mention ‘Childhood’s End’ but some dumb-ass out there would try to call it for copying ‘Independence Day’ and ‘V’!

Personally, I’d like to see a ‘Stardust Voyages’ TV mini-series.

Jack Vance’s ‘Tschai – Planet of Adventure’ novels would make for a real four-movie treat.

Foster’s “icerigger’ and its sequels are also pretty frickin’ cool (no pun intended?)… Skua September is one scenery-chewer I’d like to see on the screen, and there is just something about the word ‘stavanzer’…

Or, make my ‘BLACKSTAR’ concept. A story about humans with the distinction of there not being one single living human being in it. Call me.