Star Trek: Open a Channel: A Woman’s Trek
Written by Nana Visitor
Published by Insight Editions
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine’s Nana Visitor’s expansive new book exploring the female characters and experiences of women who worked on Star Trek in front of and behind the camera is out today. This is going to sound odd, but it’s almost a disservice that this is a coffee table-style book. It’s large and heavy with glossy pages, and while the beauty treatment is deserved, it’s almost a contradiction to the type of book it actually is. This is a book to be read cover to cover, then referenced and quoted over and over again—and maybe even carried around with you.
Then again, that’s partly what the book is about anyway: what happens beneath the pretty packaging. Nana Visitor has taken a deep dive into a fascinating, underserved subject and gone where no one has gone before—you knew I was going to say it at some point—to take a look at the history of women in Star Trek, both from a fictional and real-world perspective. She approaches this momentous task with a balance of research, context, and personal experiences, seamlessly weaving them all together to paint a full, rich picture…. or rather, multiple pictures, because another part of the takeaway is that everyone is different, and Visitor has respect for each and every story she’s been told. She thoughtfully sets the stage for each interview, reminding readers of what was happening in the world, what prevailing attitudes were towards women and gender, and where Hollywood was, women-wise, at the time.
Visitor didn’t take the easy way out on this one. She could’ve written a book about inspirational Star Trek women and filled it with uplifting stories, which was the original idea. Instead, she pulls back the curtain on Star Trek both onscreen and off, trying to chart the progression (or regression, in some cases) of the portrayal of female characters and then going behind the scenes to find out experience of the women playing them.
Sometimes the stories of conducting the interviews are just as important as the conversations themselves. With the three female cast members of The Original Series gone, she invited a group of TOS guest stars to her home to talk, along with Voyager‘s Irene Tsu (who, I learned from this book, used to date Frank Sinatra; who knew?). Because Visitor describes the gathering and her guests’ general reluctance to dig into the topic, the reader gets a more holistic view of how complex and layered their stories are.
Once she gets into the 1980s and ‘90s, Visitor has interviews from almost all the main female cast members, and when they weren’t available (due to timing or in Marina Sirtis’ case, a choice not to participate), she uses archived interviews to respectfully fill in the blanks. What she doesn’t do is create an echo chamber, a laundry list of wrongs done to women that readers can hold up and point to as symbols of injustice. She rejects the superficiality of that and delves into each woman’s individual, personal experience that covers what they were doing before Star Trek, what their experience was making it, and how they look back on the show and themselves now. She was also as kind as she was perceptive in her looks at Jennifer Lien & Kes, Majel Barrett & Chapel/Lwaxana, Grace Lee Whitney & Janice Rand, Jolene Blalock & T”Pol, and Marina Sirtis & Deanna Troi. The book is profoundly insightful, often asking questions more than answering them, and keeping this particular reader riveted for hours. There was simply no stopping once I started!
Visitor also spoke to women who wrote for the different shows (including Voyager co-creator Jeri Taylor) and, with exactly the right touch and in exactly the right amount, some of the men who could provide additional information, insight, and—most importantly, perhaps—hindsight. Brannon Braga talks about the kind of feminist work Kate Mulgrew was doing during Voyager‘s filming and admits there should have been a lot more communication with the cast when Jeri Ryan was hired, which would have saved everybody a lot of misery.
She also speaks to women who were influenced by Star Trek, including their comments throughout and then devoting a section at the end of the book to them to illustrate just how important this franchise has been to the world. And her exploration of it includes women from the new Star Trek Universe TV era too: Strange New Worlds, Discovery, and Lower Decks are all represented (with Gates there for Picard). The fact that Visitor wasn’t able to get to absolutely everybody (like Rebecca Romijn, Michelle Hurd, Linda Park, Celia Rose Gooding, Alice Eve, Zoë Saldaña, and more) means that we’ll see more from her in the future, or at least that’s my hope.
The chapter about her own experience is the most detailed and in many ways the most powerful, due to Visitor’s combination of strength and vulnerability. If you heard her on Gates McFadden’s podcast, you know she has been through a horrific trauma, and she provides more details about the assault itself as well as her reaction to it, both at the time and now with some distance and a lot of hard work behind her.
She also describes life during Deep Space Nine production in vivid detail, showing just how grueling the hours were, the pressure she put on herself, as well as the imbalance she didn’t even recognize at the time, some of which came out during her conversation with Gates McFadden about Dr. Crusher on TNG.
Gates talked to me about something that, looking back, I think was taken for granted at the time. Once she accepted the role on TNG, she never felt that she had the same access to the producers that the male actors did. “I can’t just flop on the couch, put my feet up, like a guy can, and chat. It would be seen as a sexual come-on of some sort, and so it inhibits your behavior.”
Even though I was married to Alexander Siddig for years, I never knew he hung out in Rick Berman’s office during shooting until he told me of a time where Terry Farrell was brought in when he happened to be there. She was inspected in her costume and told to lose five pounds. Siddig was mortified to have witnessed it. I never even thought hanging out in the bosses’ office was an option, and nor did many women I spoke to.
All of the stories told in these pages will stir emotional responses: sympathy and outrage, compassion and frustration, love and dismay, and it’s easy to imagine the author being similarly stirred as she researched and wrote. The book will stimulate your thinking about our roles and how we all fit (or don’t fit) into society far beyond Hollywood and the entertainment industry. Star Trek fans will get the behind-the-scenes details they want, but I don’t think you have to be a Star Trek fan to find this book impossible to put down and lead you to think deeply about both the individual and collective experiences within no matter what your background or gender. On a personal level, this is the book I’ve been waiting to read my whole life, and my brain hasn’t stopped spinning since I did so.
Available now
Nana Visitor’s full-color illustrated Star Trek: Open a Channel: A Woman’s Trek was released by Insight Editions on October 1. You can order it on Amazon in hardcover and Kindle e-book.
Interview with Nana Visitor coming soon
Keep an eye on the site for an in-depth interview with Nana Visitor. Until then, you might want to revisit the conversation we had back in 2021 when she was still writing the book.
Find more news and reviews of Star Trek merchandise.
DISCLAIMER: We may link to product affiliate links that support TrekMovie by earning a small commission when you purchase through them.
Oh! This sounds like it will be a good read. I’ve got a number of books by and about Star Trek women (Star Trek Lives!, On the Good Ship Enterprise, Beyond Uhura, Women Take the Conn: An Essay Collection by Women Writers, Star Trek: New Voyages #1 and 2, The Making of the Trek Conventions, The Longest Trek: My Tour of the Galaxy, and a few others), and this will be a great fit on the shelf alongside those excellent volumes.
Small correction to the article, though: TOS had three female cast members, not two. :)
Fixed! Thanks.
Trek Conventions was a great book, I found a replacement copy about 15 years ago and it promptly fell apart, but it is worth finding. Ditto for the Trimble ‘good ship’ which has some good bits about TWOK.
When I ran a metaphysical bookstore, I used to buy odds and very neat ends from Trimble’s daughter-in-law, Denise something. She had some great stories, and also mentioned Costner’s horrible behavior towards pretty much anybody sporting a vagina on set of THE POSTMAN.
I was obsessed with Joan Winston’s book about the Trek conventions. I still have my copy. I think I read that thing a hundred times as a kid.
Progression and regression, damned straight. Progression in featuring a woman as second-in-command in the first pilot, a character that was nixed for reasons that are still in dispute. Regression in abandoning the professional look and characterization of the women featured in the pilots in favor of the miniskirts and deferential attitudes of the series. Mainly though, Trek has, like most TV shows, reflected the times in which it was made, and it’s fascinating to contrast the traditional view of gender roles seen in “Mudd’s Women” in 1966 with Miranda Jones politely but firmly telling Kirk and McCoy to mind their own business in 1969. The times definitely were a-changin’, thank goodness.
This sounds like one of the more worthwhile Trek nonfiction books to come along in ages, and I’ll definitely want to check it out.
Both Whitney and Nichelle Nichols, who played Lt. Uhura, have maintained that wearing the mini skirts actually expressed the sexual liberation of women, a welcome contrast from the June Cleaver housekeeper image of the 1950s.
TOS is full of sexist stuff though. Turnabout Intruder is just horrible.
“I didn’t want to destroy her.”
“I’m sure we all understand that, Captain.”
“Her life could have been as rich as any woman’s. If only… if only…”
And it’s made even worse in the James Blish adaptation, where he adds an extra line!
In Blish’s rendition, Spock finishes the sentence, adding: “If only she had been able to take pride in being a woman.”
I lived through the Sixties, and understand that the miniskirts were seen by women as a token of sexual liberation at the time. And if the regular series costumes objectified women, it’s a rich historical irony that they were designed by a gay man. Still, it’s undeniable that they tended to make the female crew members look like walking secretaries and pinups by default, it being a challenge to get serious work done with your crotch only inches from view (note that Uhura had to don coveralls for her work in “Who Mourns for Adonais?”)
The miniskirts and go-go boots require a really deep dive into context to rationalize it as liberating. Individual performers may have felt that way, but when you look at how most female guest stars were clothed, or barely clothed, that liberating moment got lost quick. The look definitely hasn’t aged well, and as it still needs to be explained, the rationalization isn’t obvious at all.
I discovered Trek in the 70’s as a horny male teenager, and the barely there costumes certainly didn’t get me cheering for this victory for women’s equality….
Another person applying today’s standards to a world more than half a century away – why??? This is a TV show which had garish colours, sounds, fashions etc EVERYTHING is over the top in Star Trek TOS.
If some of the actresses themselves even said the costumes were liberating who are you to revise what they said?? If you have problems with the costumes from a show made in the 1960s then dont watch the show.
Why? Because what we refuse to learn from the past dooms us to repeat it. Can’t happen today, you say? A party wanting to return to power this fall is proposing that making America great requires the subjection of women. It idolizes a confederacy went to war to defend its slave-based economy. It’s scapegoating (non-white) immigrants as all that’s wrong with America. Yeah, it’s only a mini skirt. But in the broader practice of misogyny, it’s something to be learned from, not celebrated absent context.
So, yeah, you’re damn right I’m going to apply today’s standards to provide that context to why the sins of the past aren’t to be revisited.
When I hear criticism of Discovery’s recent finale, yes, ,DSC was a flawed series with a flawed ending. But, I just kept thinking of ,Turnabout Intruder. To be fair, Shatner did the best he could with what he was given. But, there were so many mannerisms & gestures in his performance that screamed “I’m playing a woman, ,can’t you tell”?
Sick of people who bring the mini skirts up as if it was a bad thing or condescending to women. How do you know the women did not like those costumes or may even have chose them themselves? So if Bill Theis was responsible for the mini skirts there could be any number of reasons for them never mind they were the fashion and aren’t they supposed to be a symbol of female empowerment at the time? All the things wrong with Star Trek today you mention costumes from 60 years ago?
If you’re “sick of people” who bring the miniskirts up, then don’t read comments. Discussion happens here, and not all of the comments will be things you agree with.
If you have a problem with miniskirts on Star Trek TOS (which is a product of it’s time) then you must have a problem with miniskirts period. Fine but don’t make a mountain out of a molehill
She writes about the miniskirts… just go get the book. :)
Exactly.
At no point did I say I had a problem with miniskirts. You are being absurd right now..
See above for my thoughts on the miniskirts, which should be taken in context with the depiction of women in TOS as a whole. The thread’s topic is a book whose subject is how women have been treated in the Trek franchise over the decades, not whatever other issues plague the current incarnations of it. And if you don’t think that rampant sexism by today’s standards was an issue for TOS, I don’t know what to tell you.
Well yes but how can we apply “today’s standards” to a show made 60 years ago? Are you saying in 2024 miniskirts are bad? Why didn’t anyone tell me this 🤷
Well, of course we can and do judge all sorts of things by standards that evolve over time, and there’s nothing wrong with that, so long as you also take into consideration the historical context. Admittedly, that takes effort. (For example, it takes nothing away from Lincoln’s stature as the liberator of millions of people to understand that by today’s standards the man was an unapologetic racist.) And, come on, you needn’t believe that miniskirts are “bad” — I certainly don’t! — to think that in retrospect they were probably not appropriate duty wear for women professionals charged with operating a complex spacecraft.
Yeah, miniskirts would have been fine for civilian clothing, or when we saw the female officers off-duty, but as uniforms I think they would’ve been better off making them all have pants like in The Cage. Y’know, make everyone look equal and… uniform.
Right……so why is no one complaining that they dont have seat belts on the Enterprise, because that is a bit non believable too. If miniskirts were non-functional and a lot of you are saying this (60 years after the fact) lets have the discussion on seat belts???
Because seatbelts and their functional utility aren’t the topic of this thread. This really isn’t very complicated.
And it isn’t an indictment of the people who put together TOS — which I will always love as the Trek of my generation, in spite of its many flaws — to point out the cultural assumptions that, unconsciously or not, informed the look of the show. My guess would be that Roddenberry and Theiss were looking at costumes for the ladies that were as eye-catching and attractive as possible, and didn’t give much more thought to it than that. But just as the WW II-era WAC uniforms weren’t intended for anyone who was going to see combat, the TOS minis don’t seem to be designed for crew members who will have to crawl under a console, deal with radioactive or toxic substances, or fight-off hostile aliens as part of a landing party. The unspoken message conveyed by the clothing, intentional or not, is that women on the Enterprise are mostly glorified secretaries, or just there as eye candy. Your qualms notwithstanding, that’s a perfectly reasonable topic of discussion for Trek fans and historians of popular culture.
Deflect much? The topic is mini-skirts.
roddenberry tried to keep the female officers in trousers as with the male colleagues in the early OS pilots but it obvious the pressure was on to ‘sex up’ the show and that meant the women officers ended up in mini skirts
I always found that both men and women were pretty sexualized on TOS and not just Kirk. Lots of half-naked men showing skin. Same thing on lots of other shows in the sixties, especially the westerns that I’ve been catching on MeTV in the afternoons. It was just a way to get eyeballs on the screen, attempting to appeal to men and women…
was never the same- it was mostly the women who were sexualized in ST.
bare chested kirk is seen as strong and manly and not as a sex object in the same way the mini skirted female officers and other characters were presented.
That Kirk was presented as a sex object is actually a decent point, and it’s similar to the defense of TOS’ sexism made by Roddenberry himself in the college lectures he gave in the ‘70s where he likened Bill Shatner’s torn tee shirt to the tinfoil bikinis. But of course the bare flesh ratio was pretty skewed to one gender, and the sexism was about more than just the costumes in any case.
I think Kirk was absolutely a sex object, constantly having his shirt ripped, wooing women to help the crew, offering himself up, etc. That said, Nana made a really good point in her book when talking about Enterprise. Yes, the men were objectified there too, but it IS different when one gender has been consistently sexualized and the other one hasn’t. The imbalance doesn’t go away because there’s more going on than just this example.
it was never the same as the women/actresses as soft focus ‘eye candy’ in the OS
Agree completely. It was part of Kirk’s character, but it was often ALL of their characters.
This sounds fascinating; thanks for the review!
I will own a copy of this, believe it.
Same
A pity that Jolene Blalock appears to have been sent to Mandyville on the cover of the book.
Wonder why Marina Sirtis refused to participate? She’s not somebody who’s normally short of words…
She may be in talks for a part. Legacy, maybe? She most likely doesn’t want to add a distraction to the talks.
Her reasons are her own, and I respect that. Legacy doesn’t exist, and had nothing to do with it – this book has been in the works for several years now.
This sounds like an amazing read! I been keeping up with this project since Nana announced it!
Thanks for this indepth review. I’m definitely getting it.
Are the producers or a producer in particular going to come off a bit worse after this? LoL apart from her ex-husband I only saw one man named in the article. As a lifelong fan of proper Star Trek it is not obvious (IMO) women were treated less favourably than men unless someone expects a 50/50 ratio of the sexes at all times? But at the same time it is not something I was ever watching the show to see. I watched Star Trek because it was great intelligent entertainment. If there was battling behind the scenes and sexism etc I don’t think the average viewer would have been aware. When all is said and done I think the only person post TOS who truly became a “star” in every sense of the word was Patrick Stewart. Anyone in Star Trek on TV between 1987 – 2005 not called Patrick Stewart I don’t think could take anything for granted really. Personally I respect and admire all the women who ever worked in proper Star Trek Infront of and behind the camera. The world is a VERY different place today than it was at any time since 1964.
“When all is said and done I think the only person post TOS who truly became a star in every sense of the word was Patrick Stewart.”
That is, of course, not remotely true.
Kate Mulgrew has landed some very choice roles.
Yep. And so have several others.
Scott Bakula was already considered a star as well and actually probably was the biggest ‘name’ before he became a lead in Star Trek. He was the only one I knew anyway. The others were mostly unknown although Avery Brooks had some fame thanks to Spencer for Hire.
Yeah, Bakula was a big name before Star Trek. So were some others:
LeVar Burton was a household name in the 1970s and early ’80s, thanks to Roots and Reading Rainbow.
René Auberjonois was well known because of Benson, and because he won multiple Tony awards.
Wil Wheaton was very well known, having starred in Stand By Me and The Secret of NIMH.
Jonathan Frakes had been one of the main stars of the extremely popular North and South trilogy, and he’s married to Genie Francis, one of the most recognizable actresses in soap opera history.
Whoopi Goldberg was a major movie star.
Robert Picardo’s name might not have been known, but he was in a ton of movies and extremely recognizable.
(I’m not bothering with the modern era because casting has been different, with a lot of big-namers in the bunch for all of the shows.)
Frakes absolutely was not one of the main stars of any of the “North and South” minis. Sixth or seventh at best. Which is not to say he wasn’t notable in them, but…main star? Not remotely.
Yeah, but for some strange reason I thought they were just talking about the Captains themselves. I was obviously mistaken.
And in my house Levar Burton was certainly the biggest for my parents since they watched Roots religiously back then.
And yes I personally knew both Rene Auberjonois and Ethan Phillips before joining Trek because they were both on Benson even though I never watched it lol, but remember them from the promos for years.
Very character actor-y roles, not leads in big features. Very good in them too but not a star in the way op noted.
This micro-budget sf film I’m working on, I shifted the two trans main characters to one FTM and one MTF, (as are my actors in real life) and make the story a good bit more focused on the importance of acceptance and justice in a small, backward town in the SW US desert. My budget is closer to $10k now, but what I want to do with this project is a great deal more important than my savings account anyhoo.
Best wishes to thoughtful and good old friends like kmart.
Envious, but also very glad for you, Kev.
Yeah, I’m kinda surprised folks here are struggling with the “star” concept as much as they appear to be.
Patrick Stewart did become the biggest star after Star Trek, that’s hard to deny. Leading films, headlining Broadway and West End plays, advertised as a main draw for TV shows/movies/miniseries, and a huge part of another big franchise. And this has kept up into his 80s, which is huge.
But that’s not the same as saying he’s the only true star post-Trek. Kate Mulgrew did big plays and got an Emmy nod. Jonathan Frakes, Roxanne Dawson, and Robert Duncan-McNeill became big shot TV directors and producers. Scott Bakula has kept headlining TV shows. Colm Meaney’s career hasn’t slowed down at all. Rene Auberjonois worked steadily to the end. Jeri Ryan has never been short of high profile TV work and is easily worth tens of millions. Alexander Siddig had a great stint in movies in the early 2000s and also has had an enviable TV career in the UK and Hollywood. They all clearly have no illusions that work could dry up (the TNG cast’s advice to the other series’ actors was not to make any big purchases until season 4), but it never really did for a good few of them. Take Patrick Stewart’s outlier out of the equation and these are highly successful careers beyond just one show.
GLOBAL superstar then. Star Trek created 2 global super stars, William Shatner and Patrick Stewart. I am in the UK and all the shows mentioned above barring Quantum Leap I have never seen and most never heard of. Levar Burton a household name?? – not in my house. 2 people made Star Trek work in the last 60 years – I doubt we would be here talking about Star Trek if those 2 had not sat in the captains chair. My point is compared to William Shatner and Patrick Stewart everyone probably had something to complain about
No Leonard Nimoy?
The original post said “post-TOS.”
The original post only mentioned Patrick Stewart. The post I was citing said that Trek only created two superstars, Stewart and Shatner. However you slice it, I can’t see leaving out Nimoy in that context, Spock being even more of a worldwide iconic figure for the franchise than Kirk.
the issues with sexism and gender discrimination were always there on screen with the OS and later TNG and up to Voy.
fans have debated it for years and female cast members discussed for just as long.
I can only hope!
This sounds wonderful, thanks for the review. I wasn’t expecting it to be a coffee table style book.
I’ve ordered it.
I think it’s essential reading for all genders…
Agree 100%.
I was already excited about this and now I’m even more so!! This would have been a book I’d be excited for no matter who wrote it, but it’s extra special to me that it was written by Nana, who plays my favourite Trek character in any series, and it sounds like she’s done an incredible job! Thanks so much for this review!
I am so excited for this book! I can’t wait to buy and read it! As a father, I often watched Star Trek with my daughters when they were young. Now that they are adults, we still talk about the important issues facing women today.
On Instagram Nana Visitor talks about interviewing women for the book, their different stories, and why some people are included and others aren’t. She did interview Michelle Hurd and reads that on her IG. I was disappointed that Michelle’s interview was not included in the book, and it sounds like it was an editor’s decision.
Interesting! Thanks for the info, I’ll go take a look.
Got my copy yesterday, I’ll dig in as soon as I’m done with my current read. I’m currently reading Robert Lee’s A Sin by Any Other Name. The author is noteworthy because he is a descendant of the confederate general, and the sin he is addressing is systemic racism.
Been looking forward to this for a while now. I trust it will live up to expectations.
This sounds amazing. Nana Visitor apparently took the assignment seriously. Sadly I haven’t bought a Star Trek coffee table book since the early 2000s But this will be my next one.
It seems this book is a conversation starter. I love Nana Visitor. She’s the best female character in Star Trek. I just finished the first six episodes of S6 DS9. Wow, she was amazing. I haven’t watched those in years. They don’t make episodes that great anymore. I will put this book on my wishlist.
I definitely want to read about Terry Farrell’s experience. I’m curious to what lead her to leave DS9 because I’ve only heard bits and pieces. I’m a fan of hers too.
kira had a great arc from angry former terrorist to loyal and loving member of the crew.
For Farrell it seems to have been a combination of factors, from Berman being unpleasant, not getting on with some cast members, and the opportunity to star in a sitcom instead. She’s made a few more comments about it all in recent years, so I’m also very interested to see what she has to say.
Also to see how the discussion around Jennifer Lien is handled.
Agreed!