Star Trek: The Next Generation Getting A Porn Parody | TrekMovie.com
jump to navigation

Star Trek: The Next Generation Getting A Porn Parody January 5, 2011

by Anthony Pascale , Filed under: TNG,Trek Franchise , trackback

Star Trek The Next Generation may be over 20 years old, but apparently it is still relevant enough for it to garner a brand new parody film, but a rather unusual one. Adult film makers Revolution X and Digital sin have announced they will soon start production on "Star Trek: The Next Generation: A XXX Parody". Details below.

 

TNG Gets Porn Parody

Star Trek: The Next Generation is getting a porno parody. From the official release.

On the heels of their award-winning release of the original "The Sex Files: A Dark XXX Parody," Revolution X and Digital Sin have gained a following for creating high-end, sci-fi adult movies. For the parody of “Star Trek: The Next Generation," director Sam Hain secured an impressive cast, including several self-proclaimed Trekkie porn stars.

A Captain Picard look-alike who is a mainstream actor will lead the cast on their voyage through space when the movie begins filming later this month.

Hain said, “As a fan of the ‘X-Files,’ my admiration for the show led to a demand for perfection. … I’m an even bigger fan of ‘Star Trek.’ Directing this project is a dream come true. We’re going to take adult film to a new realm of possibilities.”

Scott Taylor, president of Revolution X and Digital Sin, remarked, “Sam continues to prove he is one of the best in the industry at handling large budgets and brilliant FX visual effects. ‘The Next Generation’ will be one of our biggest movies ever, and I know Sam will create something equally embraced by consumers and critics.” 

Porn parodies of Star Trek are nothing new. In the 1990s there were quite a few, including films in the "Sex Trek" series (more info at Memory Alpha). It appears that the renewal of interest in Star Trek that started with the 2009 Star Trek movie has had an unintended consequence, spawning brand new porn parodies. In 2009 Hustler released a porn parody of the original Star Trek series titled "This Ain’t Star Trek XXX", which apparently sold well enough that in 2010 they released a sequel . Both of the Hustler parodies included a ‘non-porn’ version of the film, for those who just wanted to watch the parody for the plot and without any adult material. Revolution X tells TrekMovie that their Next Generation parody will also have a porn-free version of the film included on the DVD.

Speaking of sexy TNG, this "Star Trek: The Sexed Generation" mashup edit from AcornFilms on YouTube could provide Revolution X some ideas for their TNG parody.

 

Comments

1. P-Dizzle - January 5, 2011

Finally! A legitimate reason to take my pants off watching Star Trek!

2. SirMartman - January 5, 2011

rubbish

3. David P - January 5, 2011

wow! I don’t think anyone can top that comment

4. John from Cincinnati - January 5, 2011

why?

5. Kevin - January 5, 2011

It’s actually already been done… although, not very well. I know TNG was done… I almost think TOS as well.

6. Electron - January 5, 2011

Sex Trek: The Next Penetration

7. jas_montreal - January 5, 2011

Who’s directing this Trek? JJ Abrams ?

8. The First Son of Krypton - January 5, 2011

…. Why?

9. Dr. Cheis - January 5, 2011

Perhaps now we will get to see what REALLY happened between Data and Tasha in “The Naked Now”?

10. MJ - January 5, 2011

We had to wait 3 weeks to get this kind of news story. LOL

11. MJ - January 5, 2011

If this Sam Hain guy was a true fan of ST, then he wouldn’t be doing this.

12. Electron - January 5, 2011

@7 No, BJ Assman is directing.

13. Mr. Delicious - January 5, 2011

disgusting

14. Dr. Cheis - January 5, 2011

@11 Don’t worry, I’m sure it won’t be considered cannon unless it gets referenced in the next Star Trek film.

15. the Kirk-Doctor - January 5, 2011

someone has to go here so I will

we will finally get to see the real Captain’s log lol

16. denny cranium - January 5, 2011

Why is this considered news worthy?
This just gives fodder for the late night talk shows to make fun of Trek Fans (again)

17. AJ - January 5, 2011

Finally, with this, Trekmovie CHAT is mainstream. Time to pow-wow with Harry Ballz and the bunch to take it down two notches or so.

No farm animals, please. We just have to up the frequency of pithy orifice jokes, I guess.

18. Max - January 5, 2011

Yes! Yes! Yes!!!

19. Valenti - January 5, 2011

OK that’s cool. B)

Probably won’t watch it, but it’s good to know that it still has reach.

(And flexibility?)

20. StevenPDX - January 5, 2011

When I saw the headline to this article, I said to myself, “Oh, I’ll be the comments are going to be genuinely funny on this one.” We’re only up to 18 and so far, they’re delivering! @1: Great way to start the chain. That was hilarious!! “Keep up” the good work!

21. Basement Blogger - January 5, 2011

Hmmmm. I wonder which one will sell better, the version with the sex or the version without the sex?

22. 8472 - January 5, 2011

FAIL

23. losira - January 5, 2011

I think I will pass on this one

24. Silicon Avatar - January 5, 2011

Make it so!

25. Harry Ballz - January 5, 2011

17

Ya got that right, AJ!

…..and let’s not even think about entering a Black Hole!

“We are now entering the Bearded Clam Nebula!”

26. Capes - January 5, 2011

Well…..that changes everything !

27. Viking - January 5, 2011

So, who are they gonna cast for the role of ‘Old Ball-dy’? *NYUK* *NYUK* *NYUK*

*ducks and runs*

28. TJ Trek - January 5, 2011

This site is good for posting most anything trek related, and this certainly fits that. I guess it is the perogative of people to grype about this site if they want to, but for crying out loud, let these guys run there site as they please. be greatfull that an insider gets to hear the info he gets to hear. I imagine that once the new movie begins really reving up, that their will be more “major” news so to speak.

29. MJ - January 5, 2011

@28. We you certainly seem to be doing your share of griping here as well.

30. MJ - January 5, 2011

@16. Agreed, it’s embarrassing. It is common TV producing policy that during a televised sporting event, if some crazy guy runs onto the field, that that camera’s will not show him doing his thing…i.e. will not cover him and present him to a wider audience. By covering this story, this website is unintentionally giving these adult movie clowns additional publicity to sell their embarrassing ripoff of Trek canon.

31. "Silence will fall!" - January 5, 2011

What would Gene say?

32. Richard Dawson's Ruffled Shirt - January 5, 2011

I wonder if they’ll stay true to character and show us a Geordi who, try as he might, just can’t get laid.

33. Dr. Cheis - January 5, 2011

@30. Any other star trek spoof would be valid news for the site. Your gripe seems to be that this spoof features graphic sexual intercourse and won’t be allowed in Blockbuster stores.

34. Basement Blogger - January 5, 2011

@ 25

Ha, ha, ha!. Way to go Harry Ballz. Now everybody get to the Dec. 17 story on Sci-Fi Movies. We’re trying to go where no Trekker has gone before. Currently, the posts are 1114 which is my list of the top ten Star Trek (TOS) women.

35. keachick - January 5, 2011

Finally, explosive orgasms to rival all others!

I have not seen any others like this, but I enjoyed this. Loved the innuendo and the spoofing.

Re – Nudity (which this video did NOT show)
# MJ – I saw no nakedness. I assume you are talking about the galant naturists (or just maybe show-offs – one would hope that there was indeed something to show off) wearing nothing at all, tearing across a sports field.

I guess our naturist touch rugby club would receive no air time in the US if they were to tour the States playing the game as they have always done. Oh dear.

Lighten up, people.

36. Battle-scarred Sciatica - January 5, 2011

@19

a damn good reach around, I’ll wager!

perhaps Ben Dover will give us his supernova!

…checking the computer data banks while Data wanks….

37. Khan was Framed! - January 5, 2011

It’s already been done; in the early 90s there was one called Sex Trek: The Next Penetration.

38. 24thCenturyRockstar - January 5, 2011

I think #1 has pretty much won the whole thread, if indeed such a thing is possible. XD

#27 is definitely an honorable mention.

“Old Baldy” heh heh heh….

-24thCRS!

39. MJ - January 5, 2011

@33 @35. I didn’t say it offends me, I just think it is embarrassing to Trek. You will notice folk that there has never been a Star Wars parody XXX movie…why, because George Lucas protects his property with dozens of well paid lawyers. XXX movies and Star Trek should be mutually exclusive.

40. MJ - January 5, 2011

@ And let us not forget the classic XXX movie, “This Ain’t Star Trek,” from Adam and Eve Productions. Embarrassing!!!

41. Harry Ballz - January 5, 2011

I assume the ship will be commanded by Captain Dick-Hard?

42. MJ - January 5, 2011

@41. And when that Captain says “engage,” he means it!

43. MJ - January 5, 2011

@41. No joke, I ran into a guy once whose name was Richard Biter.

44. Jack2211 - January 5, 2011

Crusher? I don’t even know er?

I’m hoping they bring back dr. Pulaski for this.

45. Jeff - January 5, 2011

The next generation franchise is going tripple X ha love it!

46. MJ - January 5, 2011

“I’m hoping they bring back dr. Pulaski for this.”

OK, that is just wrong! LOL

47. Admiral Archer's Prized Beagle - January 5, 2011

I’m holding out for Star Trek: Deep Six Nine.

48. Harry Ballz - January 5, 2011

Make that Star Trek: Ballz Deep Nine!

49. Phil - January 5, 2011

i don’t think my mates will watch this with me….
trip_nx01@hotmail.com

50. Adam C - January 5, 2011

USS Enterprise NCC 1869-DD

51. keachick - January 6, 2011

# 39 wrote – “I just think it is embarrassing to Trek. You will notice folk that there has never been a Star Wars parody XXX movie…why, because George Lucas protects his property with dozens of well paid lawyers. XXX movies and Star Trek should be mutually exclusive.”

If they did a Star Wars parody XXX movie, Lucas could be rightly scared of it looking like some (pre)pubescents trying to make out. I mean Star Wars is basically about kids who somehow managed to appear to be in adult bodies, isn’t it?

I think a certain actor noted that when he was a kid, he loved Star Wars, but found, as an adult, Star Trek having more to offer intellectually. I agree, which surely means it has more to offer in other ways as well, given that it is more tailored towards an adult audience. Nuff said.

52. MJ - January 6, 2011

@51 “but found, as an adult, Star Trek having more to offer intellectually”

Exactly!

53. 4 8 15 16 23 42 - January 6, 2011

I was born in the US, but it never ceases to amaze me how typical Americans are so prudish and uptight, and yet fail to realize that the sexual repressiveness of the society is what brings out the “perversion” — like, to cite a more exaggerated example, the Japanese (even more repressed) with their schoolgirl pantie fetishes.

There have been, to date, a number of XXX parodies, and most of them spoofing something fairly stuffy (I think the first one that I saw a reference to was a XXX Brady Bunch parody). Has it occurred to anyone here that Star Trek may be the butt of this one because, as a franchise, it is fairly uptight? There’s no point in doing a XXX Farscape or Battlestar Galactica (the new one) parody, because those shows tackled sexuality a lot more frankly than even Enterprise with its sophomoric “I’m doing the breast I… the best, I can.” slip-of-the-tongue by Archer.

54. 4 8 15 16 23 42 - January 6, 2011

@39 — If they did a XXX Star Wars parody, there’s nothing Lucas could do about it. For one thing, all the XXX parodies make it very clear that they are not passing themselves off as the real thing. Ultimately, all the company would have to do is not use the literal name of the property, but reference enough visual cues for audiences to get it.

From “Flesh Gordon” to the XXX Files, to the XXX Star Trek parody, and on… A Star Wars XXX parody is sure to come, when some producer somewhere figures the time is right. If Space Balls only had some fornication in it, you’d have it right there. (I shudder at the thought of Rick Moranis naked).

55. MJ - January 6, 2011

@53. Speaking for myself, I have no issue whatsoever with adult material and XXX movies, but I prefer to keep that separate from my Star Trek. So, with all due respect, I can do without your condescending comments here that you seem to be applying to many of us…i.e. all of us uptight Americans who are sexually repressive…give me a break. Dude, I would just not prefer to see my beloved scifi characters having a gang-b on the Enterprise bridge….SO EXCUSSSSSEEEE ME! :-)

56. JRS - January 6, 2011

Hmm..interesting.
I take it that Trekmovie will closely follow this project and that we will see still photos, trailers..and hopefully cast pics and interviews..in the near future..
:-D

57. Victor Hugo - January 6, 2011

It won´t be better than Mr. Reinhold´s sex trek tape from “The It Crowd”.

“Damnit Jim, I´m a sexy doctor, not a sexy scientist.”

58. keachick - January 6, 2011

#55 MJ – I don’t think anyone here is suggesting that the characters should be gang-b on the Enterprise bridge. For me, it is just about acknowledging our sexuality as being an integral part of our humanity and in this, Star Trek could do better.

For instance, I have never liked, nor understood, this idea of Captain Kirk “being married” to his ship, the Enterprise. I have read it on this site. That, to me, seems unnatural and a little skanky, to be honest. There seems to be this expectation that a good looking man with a high libido and obvious interest and appreciation of women should relinquish all that passion and instinct for what…a vessel, status, work. Kirk is more than a captain of anything. He always has been. For the majority of humanity, celebacy /sexual chastity is not a healthy, natural state and to expect it of someone like James Kirk is, frankly, cruel and just a little insane. Is it any wonder that the Shatner/Kirk ended up being basically a lonely, miserable, grumpy old bastard. The one chance he did have for any kind of family and love was taken from him by a mean nasty bitch called Carol Marcus. UGH

Please, one of the best aspects of this new alternate reality is that, hopefully, this younger Pine/Kirk just might be spared some of the sexual suppression of the prime timeline and never get to meet, let alone get someone like Carol Marcus, pregnant. I want this Kirk to lead a normal healthy sexually active life with a lovely lady, who is nothing like that CM woman.

Perhaps, I’ve raved a bit…oh well.

59. AJ - January 6, 2011

Parody is protected under US law, so, theoretically, a film could be made parodying Star Wars without permission from the copyright owner.

“Weird” Al Yankovic goes the extra mile and informs the artists he imitates, but has never needed legal permission from them to parody their songs. i would assume “Sex Trek: The Next Penetration” and subsequent titles are treated similarly (And yes, I HAD to mention that title because it’s hilarious)

60. 4 8 15 16 23 42 - January 6, 2011

@55 — MJ, lighten up. Reading over your comments in particular, it’s clear to me you aren’t coming from a prudish point of view. I can tell the difference. You’d rather not see something like this come out, because it’s “embarrassing” — maybe in the same way that some folks don’t want to see a Family Guy Star Trek spoof either. Fine. Your complaint centers around the pubic image of the franchise, not some Moral Majority platform.

I don’t think we need be terribly concerned that any XXX parody will tarnish the franchise’s public image, though. Not anymore than the X-Files or Brady Bunch should be. XXX parodies exist in their own little niche, albeit a highly profitable one.

61. Jonboc - January 6, 2011

…wow…a next generation film I might actually enjoy watching!

62. Dave H - January 6, 2011

I hope Paramount steps up and stops this “Garbage” from being made. Totally tasteless and without merit. Not even funny in my opinion!

63. Holger - January 6, 2011

Why not?

64. thebiggfrogg - January 6, 2011

Uh oh, makes you wonder what “Dr. Crusher” will be doing in this…
Yikes!

65. M. Holley - January 6, 2011

No way! This shit is great!! It takes patience and creativity to make this. BTW, lighten up, its just a video.

66. Danpaine - January 6, 2011

#1 – hilarious. Right on.

67. losira - January 6, 2011

#55 well said.

68. CmdrR - January 6, 2011

Troi: I am sensing… not much.

Riker: Jeez! It’s been a long day… give a guy a break.

69. CmdrR - January 6, 2011

Worf: Protein torpedoes ready!

Troi: Full spread.

Worf: You’re supposed to wait for the order.

70. Captain Dunsel - January 6, 2011

31. “Silence will fall!” – “What would Gene say?”

Best bet? “Where’s my cut?”

71. Red Dead Ryan - January 6, 2011

#47, 48

How about “Star Trek: Deep Space Sixty-Nine”? Or “Star Trek: Voyeur”, or “Star Trek: Enter The Prize”?

72. Paulaner - January 6, 2011

OK. Now we need some photos :)

73. CmdrR - January 6, 2011

72 – You mean screen grabs?

74. The Geek that Gets Laid Often - January 6, 2011

Lots of prudes here.

I wonder if they’ll mention Troy’s scarlet uniform camel toe?

75. THX-1138 - January 6, 2011

I resent all the negative comments directed toward the adult film industry here. As a major star in several skin flicks, I can tell you that we are people too. Some of us have families to feed and bookies/dealers to contend with. My parents both told me that when I entered (snicker) into the family business I would be faced (chortle) with this sort of intolerance. I think a lot of it stems from ignorance. Gaping (hehe) holes (ff-ff-pt) in peoples understanding. I, for one, am an upright (titter) ((ho)) ((HA!)) member (HE HE) of society. And so I am coming (gurgle spit) out on this very forum.

Just call me Jack Hand.

76. Harry Ballz - January 6, 2011

As a former adult film star, here is my suggestion for the Trek XXX title:

For My Third Leg Is Hollow And I Have Touched Your Thigh

cordially,

Rock Hard

77. Harry Ballz - January 6, 2011

Good name for a Swedish adult film star:

Han Djob

78. Harry Ballz - January 6, 2011

Q: why do retired male adult film stars make lousy gas jockey attendants?

A: just as they’re about to start filling your tank, they pull the hose out and pour gas all over the hood of your car.

79. AJ - January 6, 2011

They should re-launch “Enterprise” and give poor Archer back his gonads.

He’s like the one guy on the ship who’s stuck alone on the Bridge Friday night while everyone else is out getting laid.

80. keachick - January 6, 2011

What would Gene say? Well, considering that much of TOS had women wearing the skimpiest of clothing, I would suspect either, not much at all or have a good laugh. It is just a bit of fun.

(I read that on one occasion, an actual garment fell off the actress revealing everything except what was covered by her skimpy underwear. It was held on by pins, in order to film the scene).

Star Trek from TNG onwards became rather uptight in general most of the time. Their uniforms were always full length, cover everything up. It made me feel as Trek had gone middle-Eastern/Muslim – grief. Just not healthy or natural in the longterm.

Truly – lighten up, enjoy, embrace and please – allow the skin breathe a little …

81. AJ - January 6, 2011

The question that always comes up is: What will the characters’ names be?

‘Sex Trek’ had some hilarious ones: Dr. Boner McJoy, Lt. Uwhore…and some awful ones: Jim Quirk and Mr. Sperm.

And they were pursued by the Dingons, and they eventually found the planet Youranus.

Some imagination would be nice this time around.

82. THX-1138 - January 6, 2011

Maybe they could pursue the Ramulongs this time around, AJ?

Change the name and ethnicity of the helmsman to Lt. Sanchez (that dirty boy!)?

Have Riker play a rusty trombone?

All good questions for captain Pick-hard.

83. THX-1138 - January 6, 2011

Oh, and you could keep Data’s name but make him a giant battery operated—————-

*This post has been edited due to increasing poor taste*

84. P-Dizzle - January 6, 2011

#76
Excellent sode title.

#83
Is that actually an admin edit, or are you just f***ing with us?

For a Star Wars parody, I’d go with “Sex Wars II: Attack of the Homos.” But that’s just me. As far as Trek titles go, I think “The Q and the Gay” would make an interesting flick… lol

85. THX-1138 - January 6, 2011

#84

I am f***ing with you. Over the back of a couch. And calling you dirty names.

I would think that “Where No Man Has Gone Before” is a natch title and doesn’t even need to be changed.

86. P-Dizzle - January 6, 2011

Oh and I’d hope that since we’re including this garbage that maybe you’ll post something about Captain Owen Honors, you know that Captain of the REAL USS Enterprise? I can’t imagine the discussion getting any worse than this.

87. JP - January 6, 2011

A Next Gen movie with the right kind of suck.

88. THX-1138 - January 6, 2011

There you go again with that garbage tag. We adult film actors take humbrage.

#87
That’s the spirit!

89. SChaos1701 - January 6, 2011

Some of your people need to lighten up. You are the reason for the negative stereotypes attributed to Trek fans.

90. P-Dizzle - January 6, 2011

Stereotype? I’m lonely and I’m joining the Coast Guard cause it’s the closest thing to Starfleet. I play STO for twelve hours a day and I’m 19 and live at home with my mom… yeah no stereotype here.

91. THX-1138 - January 6, 2011

#90

That’s funny!

(You’re joking, right?)

92. JP - January 6, 2011

#90 – Would you judge me harshly if I said I was thinking of joining the coast guard for the same reason?

93. P-Dizzle - January 6, 2011

#91
Sometimes I wish I was…

#92
I don’t judge fellow Trek fans. The insults end quicker if you give them to yourself. And actually I’m joining the Coast Guard to get my life underway.

94. Harry Ballz - January 6, 2011

They should make the XXX Trek movie about tantric sex and call it:

Orgasm On The Edge Of Forever

(course Harlan will expect his cut)

95. keachick - January 6, 2011

“I can’t imagine the discussion getting any worse than this.”

Give’s a chance. Working on it.

(Maybe we should take this thread to other board. They are struggling to get 1200 – last number 1164)

96. AJ - January 6, 2011

Alright…

Clear the air time.

No one, and I mean anyone, here, is allowed to comment if they’ve ever spewed in front of Star Trek alone. Sex with a partner while the ‘Trek’ is on gets you kudos. An orgasm while Trek is on with someone else ‘of the body’ creates specific healthy memory engrams, and is encouraged by Starfleet Medical.

But if you’ve ever sat there alone staring at T’Pol, Seven, Spock, Pulaski, or whomever, freezeframed on your plasma or PC as a way to free up sperm space downstairs, or heat up your female cockles, try to at least get out to the 7-11 for a drink, or buy a dog and walk it. You might meet other humans.

Starfleet recommends humans as a ‘contactable’ species, and the UFP currently does not recommend “Star Trek” for diagnosed obsessives/compulsives until CBS approves the ‘Trek”/”Twilight” ‘mash-up’ trilogy planned for 2012.

97. Rhett Coates - January 6, 2011

Interesting. One has to wonder what Paramount Pictures and CBS might say about Copyright issues with one of their hottest properties. I recall when a young ST fan’s personal website devoted to ‘Trek was to be [shut down] by the request of the studio, or something to that effect…. and another, more light-hearted parody: a stage play to be presented in Richmond, Va. during the 1990’s was cancelled due to Paramount’s objection.

Oh, well. As someone said above, what would GENE say? Perhaps imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, however this is one that raises eyebrows. And I don’t mean Vucan eyebrows.

I honestly don’t know about this; I must say that I’m cringing on how this project might reflect on Gene’s ideals – that’s my personal issue with such a parody of Star Trek, in any form.

98. MJ - January 6, 2011

@58 @80/ Keachick

I think some of us would just prefer that our adult movie collection and our star trek movie collections not have any crossover It likes Paris Hilton and drugs — we need to keep them separate.

Now, is Star Trek too uptight. Yes, I would agree with that. But is the answer to be promoting adult film spoofs of Trek — not by my book. I would prefer is Picard unmarried his ship and got more action within canon, not by some sleazebag in Van Nuys trying to make money by ripping off our grand franchise.

@60/ 4 8 15 16 23 42

OK, thanks for separating me from the prudes. Yes, I am protective of the franchise. I thought Ensign Sue was distasteful as well in that it significantly changed the behavior of main ST characters (e.g. Spock shooting down an Ensign in cold blood). Obviously, I don’t mind light-hearted humor or spoofs that do not create monsters out our beloved characters.

Somebody has got to stand up for canon and the franchise here, and I guess I’m it.

@79/ RDR. Now that is funny!

99. Will - January 6, 2011

At least it is being made now, and not in the 1980s when TNG was current — there won’t be any, um, lap-tribbles since it is being made today, with modern grooming.

100. Will - January 6, 2011

“A Captain Picard look-alike who is a mainstream actor will lead the cast on their voyage ….”

I wonder if they got the guy who does the fantastic Xavier (from X-Men) at ComicCon? He looks almost exactly like Patrick Stewart.

101. Will - January 6, 2011

I hope there’s a sequel with the Borg involved.

“We are the Org. You will be lubricated!”

102. MJ - January 6, 2011

@100.

Son: Hey mom, you know how I pretended I was Xavier and Picard at Comicon?

Mom: Yes son, that was delightful. Everyone thought you were Patrick Stewart.

Son: Well mom, guess what, a Hollywood agent from Simi Valley just called me and they want me to play Picard in a big budget movie.

Mom: That is great, son. Your grandparents are going to love this! This is your big break!

103. 4 8 15 16 23 42 - January 6, 2011

I can’t believe no one’s thought of this one yet (ahem, Harry Ballz)… no need to change the title of the episode either:

“The Devil in the Dark”

104. Harry Ballz - January 6, 2011

97. Rhett Coates “I’m cringing on how this project might reflect on Gene’s ideals”

Well, since Roddenberry chased anything in a skirt, I wouldn’t worry about it!

105. Harry Ballz - January 6, 2011

103, Well played!

How about…….

TURN her ABOUT and INTRUDEheR

106. Red Dead Ryan - January 6, 2011

Special features that may be included with this film include behind-the-scenes lessons on how to thoroughly probe Uranus. Also included is “Breast Of Both Worlds”, a bone-us two-part documentary featuring Seven Of Nine giving tips on how to acheive the ultimate Borgasm.

Other docs include “A Galaxy Pon Farr Away”, “Encounter At Pon Farrpoint”, “Dominatrix Zero”, “All Wood Things…”, “Journey To Babies”

107. Red Dead Ryan - January 6, 2011

Other episodes include “Day Of The Love”, “Unnatural Erection”, “Boobie Trap”,”Final Missionary”, “Power ForePlay”, “Ensign Hoe”, “The Undiscovered C*ntry”, “The Voyeur’s Home”.

108. The Vulcanista }:-) - January 6, 2011

#60: “pubic” image.

OMG! Haven’t read thru the thread yet, so I don’t know if anyone caught it. You, my Trek friend, have the *best* typo of the thread, unintentional or otherwise!

Peace. Live long and prosper.

109. The Vulcanista }:-) - January 6, 2011

OMG! LMFAO!!! WHY IS THERE NO “LIKE” BUTTON ON THESE COMMENTS/??? This is why I can’t let go of trekmovie.com. Evar.

110. MJ - January 6, 2011

@106 @107. Hilarious!!!!!!!

111. MJ - January 6, 2011

@107. And let’s not forget TNG episode, “We’ll Always Have Paris.” Here, this title would not need to be changed at all, as this new movie would be the sequel to the adult film, “One Night in Paris.”

112. keachick - January 6, 2011

#97 “I recall when a young ST fan’s personal website devoted to ‘Trek was to be [shut down] by the request of the studio, or something to that effect…. and another, more light-hearted parody: a stage play to be presented in Richmond, Va. during the 1990’s was cancelled due to Paramount’s objection.”

I don’t doubt it. Fortunately, there was a bit of shake up within Paramount/CBS management in the late 90s/early 2000’s. Hopefully, it would have included the firing of their PR personnel, for starters.

I know this is a fun thread and frankly I do not think that true Star Trek canon is at risk. Anyway, what has Paris Hilton and drugs got to do with this thread?

Something few, if any, of you guys would know about is what happened here in Auckland in about ’93/94. It had to do the use of the name “Starship Enterprise”, a brand new children’s hospital and the suits at Paramount. After many years of planning, fundraising with the NZ Government matching dollar for dollar any money ordinary people raised over and above what various governments had budgeted in order to build a purpose built state of the art childrens hospital, the green light was given. The topography of the land (a large hillside) set aside for this project made for an interesting design and architects and engineers realised that they had designed a land based starship Enterprise (pretty much). It was decided to call the hospital “Starship Enterprise” – with the idea of paediatric medicine warping into a bright, positive future. Paramount suits found out and stopped the naming of the hospital, demanding ongoing royalties for the use of the name. This was in spite of hospital administration being prepared to make a one-off payment to Paramount so that they could use the name.

This hospital was and is run by the NZ Government via taxpayer contributions and via charitable donations. It is NOT a profit-making facility. It is there to provide best medical care possible for sick children, not only within NZ, but for many Pacific Island nations, free at the point of entry. The suits would have been told that. However, the small minded, greedy b*stards still insisted on royalties, blah, blah. It created a lot of bad feeling. Star Trek TNG was screening at the time, followed by DS9. However, somehow, I feel that Star Trek has not been as popular here since then.

The hospital is called the Starship Childrens Hospital and in its foyer is a large picture – an artist’s impression of this starship hospital in warp drive mode. Trekkies win… well, sort of.

113. MJ - January 6, 2011

@112. “Anyway, what has Paris Hilton and drugs got to do with this thread?”

LOL

114. MJ - January 6, 2011

@112. Sounds like Paramount in the 1990’s…they were old school studio paranoids back then.

115. The Vulcanista }:-) - January 6, 2011

There’s a string of adult-novelty stores here in ATL called “Starship Enterprise.” I can’t believe Paramount hasn’t sued the Latex out of ‘em yet.

116. AJ - January 7, 2011

If anyone brings up “Gene’s ideals” or “Gene’s vision” again, especially in this thread, it’s time to go back to Star Trek 101. He was a notorious womanizer. Also, just have a look at all those beautiful ladies in Bill Theiss’s revealing costumes. THAT is ‘Gene’s vision.’

117. spocko - January 7, 2011

comment #2

c’mon it’s a parody….it’s meant to be funny….proof that Trekkies take this stuff too seriously….get a life

118. CmdrR - January 7, 2011

And how do YOU know about Starship Enterprises, V?

Actually, we went to shoot a news story in one of their shops. But, no matter what angle I checked, there was no way to shoot an interview without a body part (and not an innocuous elbow, mind you) in the frame.

And why are we ignoring Gorn pourn? “Behind the Green Door”…
“Lisp Dirty to Me”… and “How Green Was Her Valley?”

119. Rom(ulan) Jeremy - January 7, 2011

Adult films are a sacred trust and should not be sullied by Trek.

120. THX-1138 - January 7, 2011

#119

You say true and we say thankya.

Give ‘em the Ramulongs!

121. Lt. Bailey - January 7, 2011

I guess they would not be using “…where no man has gone before!”

122. THX-1138 - January 7, 2011

As I said before, I thought that ep title would be no-brainer. Kind of in the vein (giggle) of a first-timer vid.

I know too much about pourno.

123. MJ - January 7, 2011

@116 “If anyone brings up “Gene’s ideals” or “Gene’s vision” again, especially in this thread, it’s time to go back to Star Trek 101. He was a notorious womanizer. Also, just have a look at all those beautiful ladies in Bill Theiss’s revealing costumes. THAT is ‘Gene’s vision.’”

Pointing out faults in a person’s character has nothing to do with the vision and worldviews a person has. We all are never really quite what we’d like to be — but that doesn’t stop us from having a positive future vision of what would would like ourselves and the future to be. Check out Bill Clinton as a prime example of this.

I actually met and spent some time with Gene in the later 70’s. He was a progressive guy and supported women’s rights. And no, I don’t think he would get a good natured chuckle out of an adult spoof of TNG. He certainly not be pleased about it. Imagine you write a book or make a movie that you take very seriously, and then someone bastardizes it into a XXX movie and makes money on it as well…I don’t think you would have a good laugh over it…no, I think the first thing you would do would be to examine your legal options. Maybe after that, when your lawyer tells you that you can’t do anything about it, then you fall back into a public facade of “no big deal, it’s kind of funny,” while inside you want to find the sleazebag SOB in Van Nuys who made that crap movie and strangle him.

124. darendoc - January 7, 2011

Rob Burnett and I had a conversation years and years ago about how so many of the TOS episode titles lent themselves to being a euphemism for sex itself…

Amok Time
Charlie X
the Corbomite Maneuver
Balance of Terror
The Trouble with Tribbles
the Way to Eden
this side of Paradise
Wolf in the Fold
Turnabout Intruder
Is There in Truth No Beauty

and so on.

Try it yourself… it makes good 3 in the morning comic con discussion.

125. THX-1138 - January 7, 2011

#123

Since he’s dead this is a pointles argument, one way or another. One thing is for sure; if you put something out for public consumption and only expect it to be lauded and praised and not parodied and made fun of you are seriously delusional.

One can “imagine” or “think” whatever they want about what Gene Roddenberry would think about a XXX flick inspired by Star Trek but they could never, ever know for sure. For all we know he may have kept a stash of skin flicks in the bottom drawer in his desk in his office. He certainly had a vision for the future but that doesn’t preclude him from purchasing some adult materials. Or having a sense of humor.

126. MJ - January 7, 2011

“For all we know he may have kept a stash of skin flicks in the bottom drawer in his desk in his office. He certainly had a vision for the future but that doesn’t preclude him from purchasing some adult materials.”

Agreed, but this is not my point.

127. THX-1138 - January 7, 2011

Right then. I’ll address wht I belive AJ’s point was. Namely, that Gene may or may not have expressed outrage over this adult film. It’s a point I thought I made in my first paragraph:

“Since he’s dead this is a pointles argument, one way or another. One thing is for sure; if you put something out for public consumption and only expect it to be lauded and praised and not parodied and made fun of you are seriously delusional. “

It seems terribly presumptuous to argue what the reaction of a man who is no longer with us would be. Also, I think it’s a response to the “deification” of Gene Roddenberry that many fans get caught up in. He was no doubt talented and came up with the kernal of an idea that has lasted for generations, but he was still only a man. To assume the mantle of his supposed outrage is curious.

128. Harry Ballz - January 7, 2011

127. THX-1138 “Gene Roddenberry….came up with the kernal of an idea”

And even that he stole from Forbidden Planet, a movie made 8 years earlier. When one peels away all the rhetoric and hyperbole, what portion (being truly original) did Roddenberry actually contribute? Other than pitching “wagon train in space” and calling himself a producer, I would suggest…not much.

129. THX-1138 - January 7, 2011

I guess I dislike how Star Trek fans feel the need to elevate Star Trek actors/producers and such to such a lofty state.. Certainly if I were to meet Nimoy or Shatner or any of the rest I would probably react like a giddy fan. No doubt. But would I feel that the world revolves around them? Heck no. How would any of us presume to know what they are thinking? Particularly if they are dead? And if one was to deify them, would they then be commiting an act of hubris?

And Oh, good Lord, can we get an edit function for the posts? I am cringing when I look at my typos. I am not as stupid as my spelling would seem to indicate.

130. Harry Ballz - January 7, 2011

Well, I, for one, feel greatly reassured! :>)

131. CmdrR - January 7, 2011

Trek needed everything it had to become what we all love so dearly. I could never discount Gene Rodenberry’s drive to get the idiot networks (CBS passed in favor of LIS) to air Star Trek. My only pertinent quibble today is that some people think Trek sprang from Gene’s head complete. Of course not. We true fans take careful note of all the creative people who contributed. As to pourn… can’t we all just indulge in a sophomoronic chuckle and allow our image of Gene to be in on the joke? IDIC, people. IDIC.

132. Harry Ballz - January 7, 2011

IDIC?

I Dig Intercourse Completely……….right?

133. Harry Ballz - January 7, 2011

I Do It Calmly?

134. Harry Ballz - January 7, 2011

I Dig Intellectual Chicks?

135. CmdrR - January 7, 2011

Ichthyologists do itchy carp.

“I don’t inhale cannibas” — Bill Clinton

“It’s dandy in Canada” — Harry Ballz

136. Harry Ballz - January 7, 2011

Insanely Diligent In Coitus

137. MJ - January 7, 2011

@131 “can’t we all just indulge in a sophomoronic chuckle and allow our image of Gene to be in on the joke? IDIC, people. IDIC.”

I don’t think IDIC covers XXX film producer stealing Trek Canon and making pourno movies of it, then pocketing all the money themselves. In a case like this, profiteering under the guise of IDIC is not close to the meaning of IDIC. IDIC does not include the theft of intellectual property, even if the law creatively protects a pourno movie to be made based on someones work under the clever guise of a “parody.”

138. Harry Ballz - January 7, 2011

The producers of this crap must think IDIC means I Desire Instant Cash!

139. MJ - January 7, 2011

@127 “It seems terribly presumptuous to argue what the reaction of a man who is no longer with us would be. Also, I think it’s a response to the “deification” of Gene Roddenberry that many fans get caught up in. He was no doubt talented and came up with the kernel of an idea that has lasted for generations, but he was still only a man. To assume the mantle of his supposed outrage is curious.”

My argument is based on human nature as applied to a producer, director, musician or novelist. When someone steals your intellectual property and you are not compensated for it, you are not going to to happy. However, when this is done as a legitimate parody, then in many cases, you would like it and be flattered by it. But, if someone were to make a XXX movie in the guise of a parody, to essentially profiteer off of your creation by creating a monstrosity of your characters, I don’t think you would find this so funny. And at this point, like I said earlier, your first stop is probably your lawyers, and they give you the bad news that you have no recourse. So then, to cover up how pissed off and irritated you are over this theft of your creation, all you have left to do is pretend that it is now big deal and that you think it is kind of funny.

140. MJ - January 7, 2011

@138 “The producers of this crap must think IDIC means I Desire Instant Cash!”

I COULD NOT HAVE SAID IT BETTER MYSELF !!!

141. Harry Ballz - January 7, 2011

Thanks, MJ!

142. AJ - January 7, 2011

Never, ever forget that “IDIC” was thought up by GR as a way to make money via his new merchandising company. He wanted to sell little triangles to the fans.

So for all of those who feel “IDIC” is something other than a commercial attempt to hoodwink fans, well, you’ve been hoodwinked.

143. MJ - January 7, 2011

.

144. MJ - January 7, 2011

@142

I definitely infer commercialization.

145. Richard Dawson's Ruffled Shirt - January 7, 2011

125

“One thing is for sure; if you put something out for public consumption and only expect it to be lauded and praised and not parodied and made fun of you are seriously delusional.”

Amen, brother

146. MJ - January 7, 2011

@145. Agreed. But getting ripped off by profiteering adult movie-makers who, UNDER THE GUISE OF PARODY, completely bastardize your creation into a XXX film for their profit only is taking is not acceptable IMHO.

Doing a general parody on a comedy tv show or internet site is one thing, stealing someones creation and characters for a pourno film by cleverly using the excuse of it being parody is quit another — AMEN!

147. Richard Dawson's Ruffled Shirt - January 7, 2011

Did this thread get locked? Twice now I’ve tried to make a post, and twice now, said post, after all my hard work, has not posted.

148. Richard Dawson's Ruffled Shirt - January 7, 2011

Of course, THAT posted…. make me look stupid….

er

149. Richard Dawson's Ruffled Shirt - January 7, 2011

Okay, what’s the trick? I’ve tried now a third time to post an even briefer version of my previous two attempts at a comment on this thread and nothing’s happening.

150. Red Dead Ryan - January 7, 2011

#143

!

151. Red Dead Ryan - January 7, 2011

Listen guys, whatever we might think of “XXX Star Trek”, we the consumers have the power to approve or disapprove of it with our wallets. Just that simple.

152. Red Dead Ryan - January 7, 2011

IDIC—-Infinite D*cks, Infinite C*nts

153. MJ - January 7, 2011

@152. RDR, well that will really test whether Anthony gives a flying f**k anymore about policing posts. LOL

154. MJ - January 7, 2011

@147 @148 @149

That is just the Trekmovie.com system’s way of telling you not to bother and that MJ bested you in this discourse.. :-)

155. Red Dead Ryan - January 7, 2011

153

I bet that motherf*cker Anthony is too f*ckin’ busy not putting up with us d*cks and c*nts to give a rat’s a*s!

Hee Hee!

156. 24thCenturyRockStar - January 7, 2011

#149 – Yeah, I made a couple of posts the other day only to find that neither of them actually made it onto site. My guess is that there is a word-filter in place that has more to do with the software than the actual folks who operate the site. Oh well.

You know, what surprises me is how long these “Trek After Dark” themed posts can go on. Personally, if someone wanted to make a skin flick of my life’s work – I’d think it’d be freaking awesome. Definitely enough source material. :P

– 24thCRS!

157. keachick - January 7, 2011

My posts aren’t going through either. Anthony – what is going on with this site?

158. MJ - January 7, 2011

@155 LOL HA HA HA HA

159. MJ - January 7, 2011

@156

Party on Wayne.

Party on Garth.

160. Harry Ballz - January 7, 2011

How about a little Gorn pourn?

You know what they say…..once you go Gorn, you never go back.

That’s because you’re probably dead!

I can see it now………Gorns Gone Wild!!

161. Red Dead Ryan - January 7, 2011

160

That’s pretty Gorn-y, Harry…..

162. MJ - January 7, 2011

@160. So long as their is some girl Gorn on girl Gorn action, I am all for it.

163. Harry Ballz - January 7, 2011

162

Well, you know what they say…….if you can’t beat ‘em, lick ‘em!

164. keachick - January 7, 2011

Is what #156 saying true? Is this the reason why everyone here is misspelling “pourno”? This word does not exist. However, the word written correctly does have a very definite meaning and is actually a very old word. Comes from classical Greek originally. I wrote two posts and neither got through to this site. It was not rude. I only wrote the second one because the first one did not appear here.

Anthony – Please – check the word filter etc. On other sites the C word is banned. Should this word, in any form, along with the awful term “motherf****”, be banned here as well? I don’t know – what do you’s think?

165. MJ - January 7, 2011

But I will add that a major reason that I don’t thin Gornpourn will ever catch on is the extreme running time of the movies…because the Gorns move so damn slow, one typical Gorn XXX scene runs about 4.5 hours before they can achieve shangri la.

166. MJ - January 7, 2011

@164. “Is this the reason why everyone here is misspelling “pourno”?”

Spock: Dr, McCoy, the changes of 5 independent humanoids misspelling the same one word within a 4 day period of communication is 4 trillion, 785 billion, 384 million, 187 thousand, 216.45783 to 1.

167. MJ - January 7, 2011

@ 164. Just use “fatherf*****” instead.

168. Harry Ballz - January 8, 2011

165

Not to mention the male Gorn has a horrible track record for scoring with female Gorn at bars. Probably because his pick-up line is, “I shall be merciful and quick!”

169. keachick - January 8, 2011

#167 So, somebody who is upset about a Star Trek “pourn” (ugh!!!) parody but is OK with the use of the term “fatherf****”? Whoa. Please, MJ, you are digging yourself in a little deep here.

170. MJ - January 8, 2011

@ 168. And given male Gorns are slow in the act, the withdraw method of contraception takes a male Gorn a full 20 minutes, by which time it is way too late. This little known fact about Gorn mating habits explains the Gorn population explosion in the early 23rd century, which led to their conquest of other worlds, and eventually their encounter with the Enterprise.

And I bet a lot of you reading these posts were wondering what this all had to do with Star Trek!

171. MJ - January 8, 2011

@169 Nice try. LOL

172. Harry Ballz - January 8, 2011

Making jokes about a nubile reptile is juvenile!

173. thebiggfrogg - January 8, 2011

My guess: phasers are going to get a new setting.

174. Victor Hugo - January 8, 2011

The only thing that upsets me about this post is the mention that “Star Trek: TNG” is old.

Well, that reminds me too much like a spoiled 12 year old playing a 2010 game and complaining that a 2009 game is “OLD”.

Haven´t we, in the 80´s and 90´s still enjoying movies and tv shows from the 50 and 60 and calling them “classics”?

This “OLD” namecalling is too annoying.

175. Red Dead Ryan - January 8, 2011

Fatherf*cker, motherf*cker, sisterf*cker, brotherf*cker, unclef*cker, auntf*cker, cousinf*cker. After all is said and done (as in f*cked) that be one f*cked up family!

“Meet The F*ckers”!

176. AJ - January 8, 2011

174:

Victor Hugo:

It’s funny now to watch the squeaky-clean digitally enhanced versions of TOS, as they look so good as to be brand new, and then the blurry syndicated broadcasts of TNG.

As a collection of 80 works, TOS is a classic. Even the ‘duds’ have acquired that status. TNG has a while to go before that can be said.

177. CmdrR - January 8, 2011

I wonder if Andorians take little blue pills?
Actually, if they watch Trek pourn, they probably don’t need to.

178. Victor Hugo - January 8, 2011

True, even the TNG DVDs really looks kinda blurry, even with me not being too picky about resolution.

Same thing with my “Babylon 5″ DVD boxes from season 3 and 4, which have a painful low resolution. Specially with special episodes like “Into the fire”, that featured beautiful battle scenes, they looked better on TV, when Warner aired them.

X-files also squeezed four episodes per DVD, but they look much better.

179. Richard Dawson's Ruffled Shirt - January 9, 2011

The geek in me needs to point out we now have a post for every episode of “Star Trek: TNG”.

I just cried a little.

180. Phaser Guy - January 9, 2011

This site is still around?

181. AJ - January 10, 2011

180:

Yes. We make up cool headlines like “IDW to release 25-issue ‘Wesley and the Traveler” Mini-series” or “Star Trek: Online: Pakled Invasion Force!” Module to be Released.” ” and hope people will respond in the talkbacks. Until there’s some real news, that is! Then, Anthony and his team post it.

182. Richard Dawson's Ruffled Shirt - January 10, 2011

Would you rather have dinner and then sex with Megan Fox’s body with Leonard Nimoy’s head on it or re-roof an entire condo complex by yourself?

183. CmdrR - January 10, 2011

Can I put a bag over Legan Fox’s head?

184. AJ - January 10, 2011

CmdrR:

I think (L)egan Fox would have to fellate you with Nimoy’s head while you recite the E Plebnista.

185. AJ - January 10, 2011

This thread is gasping to keep from ‘rock bottom’ status and NOT succeeding.

186. P Technobabble - January 10, 2011

I’m surprised this topic hasn’t gone limp…

187. keachick - January 10, 2011

How come Anthony can write the ‘p’ word and we can’t?

#187 The viagra must still be working…

188. CmdrR - January 10, 2011

185 – We get the thrust of your statement and the jizt of your conclusions.

Now you owe us dinner and a movie, AJ.

189. Mr. J. - January 10, 2011

Where’s the preview?

190. 24thCenturyRockStar - January 10, 2011

#184 – Wahahahahahaha! That was probably the most dorkily triumphant thing I’ve read all day! XD Good show sir!

– 24thCRS

191. Harry Ballz - January 10, 2011

184.

Talk about an oral presentation!

192. Jack2211 - January 11, 2011

184. Amazing.

Wait, what p-word? Pakled?

Now I’m picturing the Pakleds demanding that Geordi make them, er, come.

Shudder.

And weren’t there occasional jokes about the aliens of the week having, er, vaginas (it’s a dictionary word) on their foreheads? Now it can be true.

Reconfiguring the iso-labial chips?

Sorry, nothing on HBO.

193. Richard Dawson's Ruffled Shirt - January 11, 2011

192

Now I’m picturing a nude Pakled saying, “We look for things that make us go”.

Of course, with Pakleds, they don’t know if they’re coming or going.

Gross!

194. AJ - January 11, 2011

This thread is now back on the upschwing!

195. CmdrR - January 11, 2011

No new threads in 6 days… again. I think Anthony has discovered women.

196. AJ - January 11, 2011

195:

Only the good Trekkies get to graduate from Trek-pron in mom’s basement to actual flesh-and- blood women (which can also be in mom’s basement).

197. THX-1138 - January 11, 2011

I shall pick this time to premier a 69 Forward staple to the front page:

Boobies.

I felt (tee-hee) it was appropriate.

And MJ: Just another reminder. Gene Roddenberry is dead. He won’t be suing anybody over mis-appropriation of intellectual property. Plus too also, this isn’t the first time a pourno flick has been made using Star Trek as inspiration. So somewhere along the line it may be assumed that a precedent has been set as to who remunerative compense should go. We (the fans) just don’t have all the facts.

198. CmdrRunning like hell. - January 11, 2011

deleted

199. CmdrR - January 11, 2011

Just seeing if Lord Anthony is watching.

200. AJ - January 11, 2011

198:

So much for the great unveiling of Trek2012. This one has a Chief Engineer named “Twatty.”

201. keachick - January 11, 2011

#199 Lord Anthony may not be watching, but I did. OMG Nothing left to the imagination in those pictures. Are all those participants on crack or something?

I think I had more than my fill (excuse the pun) of hardcore pron to last me a while.

Thank you for that link…I think…;)

202. CmdrR - January 11, 2011

198 Actually… I apologize. Really. Please remove that. It was meant as adult humor, but I forgot not everyone here is over 18. Really. Fun is fun, but that’s wrong. Sorry, folks. My attempt at humor overpowered my better judgement.

203. AJ - January 11, 2011

CmdrR:

Don’t sweat it. The thread is specifically about pron.

204. THX-1138 - January 11, 2011

I don’t know about the video but there is an ad next to it that has pictures of people being attacked by some horribly disfigured large snake. And a woman with some sort of obvious gastro-intestinal problem.

Chilling.

205. AJ - January 11, 2011

I have the impression that the ‘inmates are in charge of the asylum’ here at Trekmovie.

Boobies!

206. keachick - January 11, 2011

So, it seems we can’t type the ‘p’ pron word here, but we can post *interesting* video links. And just as it should be.

#203 I assume you are referring to your post 199. Removal is not an option and resistance is futile!

207. keachick - January 11, 2011

To CmdrR – you could post that video to the other board which is trying to reach at least the number 1701. Things are going slowly there but posting this video could stir things along in an upward direction, as it were, over there. You might even get a stirring from Anthony.

What some people will do for a little attention…:)

208. AJ - January 11, 2011

keachick:

Some of us have been here quite a long time.

Anthony will respond to you personally and immediately, should your tip be of value, or concern be worth considering. But he stays above the fun ‘n ‘ games of stuff like this, generally.

*Cough* is Nimoy in “the Hobbit” *Cough*

209. 24thCenturyRockStar - January 11, 2011

“She knew how to bake a pie, not how to solve it!”

XD!

– 24thCRS

210. Richard Dawson's Ruffled Shirt - January 11, 2011

Effing board won’t let me post again… ARGH!

211. Harry Ballz - January 11, 2011

ARGH??

You sound like someone who grew up reading Hulk comic books!

212. Red Dead Ryan - January 11, 2011

198

Holy f*ck!

213. AJ - January 12, 2011

ARGH! Hulk smash puny Rick Jones! Hulk also smash Rick Berman! Hulk forget why, but Hulk smash puny human anyway! ARGH!

214. Victor Hugo - January 12, 2011

F.that, i wanna read more “Ensign Sue Must Die” comics”!

215. Jack2211 - January 12, 2011

Yeoman Gland. Squatty. Jeepers.

216. Picard's Flute - January 12, 2011

When you’re done watching the TNG adult film, check out the new Simpsons adult film! Trailers at aintitcoolnews.com

217. Picard's Flute - January 12, 2011

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/48027

218. CmdrR - January 12, 2011

217 – I just knew it wasn’t a kiddie show.

219. captainedd - January 12, 2011

How ironic…the CO of the real Enterprise just got sacked for rude videos broadcast over their closed-circuit TV…here’s the article…

http://www.military.com/news/article/cyber-warrior-to-take-enterprise-command.html

220. captainedd - January 12, 2011

Here’s the other link that I found:

http://www.military.com/news/article/enterprise-skipper-condemned-defended.html

221. keachick - January 12, 2011

Isn’t this what is meant by “military intelligence”?

222. garen - January 12, 2011

deleted

223. captainedd - January 12, 2011

@ 221 – As always, the two terms are “mutually exclusive”.

224. Harry Ballz - January 12, 2011

223

Like jumbo shrimp?

225. keachick - January 12, 2011

Just wondering, captainedd (at no. 224 on my screen) – are you referring to my post (no. 222) on “military intelligence”? or the post above?

This seems to not be the first time I appear to see one number and others appear to see a different number next to the same post…

226. MJ - January 13, 2011

@222

Seeing this completely validates my earlier posts. This is not a parody. This is a hardcore XXX movie that is ripping off Star Trek in the guise of a parody. I know parodies, and this ain’t no parody folks.

227. MJ - January 13, 2011

@217. Thanks so much for the Simpons XXX post. You win Trek smut peddler of the month. Congrats!

228. keachick - January 13, 2011

MJ – The first video I watched within the thread information itself – the picture with Deanna Troi, was not (hard-core) pron, but the two later links that others have posted could be considered more hard-core. There isn’t much left to the imagination and there seems to be no story attached to these images. These were explicit.

Personally, I don’t feel *excited* by these pictures. It’s more like, at first, OMG, holy crappola followed by yeah, yeah, seen it, boring, …

However, if there were an erotic love story told, which showed the couple at some point in their relationship, engaging in some of the activities depicted in those pictures, then I think I would have a more positive feeling about it. I guess I need to see some expression of genuine friendship and affection, along with any expression of sexual activity and normal nakedness associated with most loving embraces.

I have to admit that it has been a few years since I have seen such explicit images on film. I can’t recall the last time. Many years ago, as part of a tour group, we went to see a sex show in Amsterdam, Netherlands. They showed kissing, caressing, intercourse, a blow job but I don’t recall seeing the guy actually coming or any woman drinking it…ICK.
I guess I’ve been too busy making my own fun and having three children in the process.

229. MJ - January 13, 2011

@228. Agreed. Looks like they have done just enough to get past the legal definition of parody to cover any legal challenge from Paramount. But that is not to be confused with the common sense definition of a parody, and from what I see here, I don’t see that passing that test. It is a hardcore XXX movie that is ripping off the Trek franchise and providing more profits for that “great American,” Larry Flint. Larry Flint is ripping off Star Trek — anyone who disagrees with that is under serious delusion and should be medicated.

I got no problem with pourn, but I prefer it be kept separate from my Star Trek, thank you.

230. Phil - January 13, 2011

We may not have issues with..ahem…adult entertainment, but I’ll bet the advertisers who buy space here do. As we seem to have figured out that no one is watching the store again I’d like to SUGGEST that anyone else who may be thinking about posting objectionable material refrain from doing so. It may be costing the owners of the site advertising dollars, and that would be a really bad way to thank someone for all the effort that has gone into making this page what it is.

231. Picard's Flute - January 13, 2011

MJ

Thanks for the name calling. Very mature.

Doo doo head.

232. MJ - January 13, 2011

@231. But you are so deserving of that award. I mean you posted multiple XXX movie links here for us. Revel in your award — don’t fight it! Be proud of your XXX links that you provided on a Star Trek web site. Congratulations!!!

233. keachick - January 13, 2011

One of the words used to describe these types of XXX movies is smut. It is quite likely that in fact, being exposed to a little smut may not necessarily be a bad thing for people, from a psychological point of view.

I’m sure there are people who will disagree, but I stand by what I have written. It’s a matter of moderation…

234. MJ - January 13, 2011

@233. Agree completely. I just prefer my smut not to be mixed with my Star Trek.

235. Buzz Cagney - January 13, 2011

I’ve done my best to avoid commenting on this story in the hope it would soon be moved out of the way by newer stories. Sadly more than a week has passed and its still hanging around.
Its not really worthy of this brilliant website.

236. MJ - January 13, 2011

@235 Well said. A rare voice of sanity amidst a cast of clowns.

237. Picard's Flute - January 14, 2011

#232

Go back and do your damn math! I’ve posted one link in this entire thread. I know that “CmdrRunning like hell” looks a whole hell of a lot like “Picard’s Flute”, but COME ONE!!!

I don’t know what angers me more: the fact that you don’t know how to read, or the fact that you find name calling an acceptable tactic in an adult conversation.

This started off as a fun little game of being snarky, but now you’ve seriously peed me off.

238. MJ - January 14, 2011

OK, your right, my math is wrong. You only posted 1 single XXX link on Trekmovie.com.

Therefore, I’ll tell you what, I’ll rectify this awkward situation by reducing your award to “Smut Peddler of the Week” for Star Trek web sites then. The monthy honor should correctly go to someone who posts multiple XXX links or a Star Trek web site. I promise I won’t make this mistake again.

Kapish? We square now?

239. Picard's Flute - January 14, 2011

While you’re damning people for making “xxx posts” why don’t you go after Anthony, the webmaster, who posted this initial story? Does he get the smut peddler award too?

240. ` - January 14, 2011

Anthony did not post an XXX movie link. The only video he posted was at the top of this thread in the information part – the one with Deanna Troi. It did not contain any sexually explicit scenes or nudity or partial nudity – maybe one scene with an uncovered male torso. It was more a collection of scenes from TNG put together to make it appear that the characters were involved in some sort of sexual exposition. It was actually quite skillful and rather funny.

However, the same cannot be said with the XXX movie links posted. I did not think there was much that was skillful – just film showing pron actors do stuff with their own or each other’s sexual organs. One of these videos showed these activities being performed in front of an audience. Whoopdie doo…Yawn.

241. Picard's Flute - January 14, 2011

Never said Anthony posted a XXX link. Said he posted the “initial story”.

Oh well…

242. MJ - January 14, 2011

@241. I wanted this to be professional. Efficient, adroit, cooperative, not a lot to ask. Alas, your Mr. Takagi did not see it that way, so he won’t be joining us for the rest of his life.

243. chrisfawkes.com - January 14, 2011

So much hard work has gone into creating a great Star trek site here and Anthony and anyone involved is due a load of respect for it.

This particular thread should not have been in my opinion but we all make mistakes.

Nuke it and move on. My 2 cents for what thats worth.

244. Phil - January 14, 2011

Won’t miss this thread if it’s deleted..

245. MJ - January 14, 2011

##### ANTHONY >>>> PLEASE DELETE THIS THREAD *****

246. AJ - January 14, 2011

245:

MJ, that post annoys everyone here except you. Just stop visiting for awhile, and the thread will cycle down and go away.

247. THX-1138 - January 14, 2011

For the record, this site has reported before on Trek-pourn movies in the past. This is not an “all of a sudden, out of the blue, no precedent before it” occurance. Anthony has also taken for granted that Trek fans are intelligent enough to avoid articles they may find disturbing or distasteful, as the article’s title gives you a pretty clear picture of what it’s about. He also has stated that he won’t shy away from stories because some people might find it objectionable. In other words, if he finds a story interesting he’ll include it.

I am not a moderator MJ,. But the ridiculous spamming you are doing isn’t proving your point. It defies reason for you to keep railing on a thread that you:
A) cannot change—and
B) admittedly find objectionable.

There were some of us that have a different sense of humor than you and were making jokes about the subject matter. I can appreciate your not wanting to be subjected to this kind of material. Can you accept the fact that it didn’t bother some of us and we were having a bit of fun with it when you began railing against it?

248. Picard's Flute - January 14, 2011

Amen AJ

249. ` - January 14, 2011

I agree with #247 THX-1138. There is no one forcing you to watch any of the video links. I watched the two links posted on this board by other posters to understand better the comments. I did not find the films particularly edifying, but that’s just me.

Frankly, I do not see why topics like p–nogra-hy should not discussed on this message board, along with how the MPAA rates a film, sexuality, nudity or anything other related issues. These topics all have a bearing on what may or may not written or shown in any Star Trek movie.

It is possible that minors may come to this site, which is why people should give consideration as to the use of certain words and posting of certain types of video links. Other than that, I suspect the vast majority here are grups anyway.

250. THX-1138 - January 14, 2011

Word.

Besides, right after CmdrR. posted his link he was remorseful and asked for it to be yanked (snicker). Unfortunately, given Anthony’s other commitments, it has remained.

I myself am not bothered in the least by any of it. There are other greater things in this world and the universe that cause me fear and aggravation. Films of people engaged in sexual congress are not among them.

251. Phil - January 14, 2011

As mentioned previously, the existance of these links may cause problems with the sites advertisers, and possibly law enforcement if minors can come into contact with the material unrestricted. The polite thing to do, as a favor to the owners, would be to refrain from posting anymore links until the moderators return.

Yes, coversations can be had about “Mature Material”. They don’t need to be illustrated with links to the hard core stuff. There are plenty of sites for that, as the last time I checked the adult industry is still the most profitable industry on line..

252. CmdrR - January 14, 2011

Nuke it from orbit. It’s the only way to be sure.

Actually, I’m more concerned that we hear ANYthing from Lord Anthony.

253. MJ - January 14, 2011

@246 / AJ: “MJ, that post annoys everyone here except you. Just stop visiting for awhile, and the thread will cycle down and go away.”

AJ, you must have missed these two posts immediately preceding my posts, which support the idea of having Anthony and staff delete this useless thread:

243. chrisfawkes.com – January 14, 2011
So much hard work has gone into creating a great Star trek site here and Anthony and anyone involved is due a load of respect for it. This particular thread should not have been in my opinion but we all make mistakes. Nuke it and move on. My 2 cents for what thats worth.

244. Phil – January 14, 2011
Won’t miss this thread if it’s deleted.

AJ, you stand corrected!

254. MJ - January 14, 2011

@251: “As mentioned previously, the existance of these links may cause problems with the sites advertisers, and possibly law enforcement if minors can come into contact with the material unrestricted. The polite thing to do, as a favor to the owners, would be to refrain from posting anymore links until the moderators return. Yes, coversations can be had about “Mature Material”. They don’t need to be illustrated with links to the hard core stuff. There are plenty of sites for that, as the last time I checked the adult industry is still the most profitable industry on line.”

Well said, Phil.

255. CmdrR - January 14, 2011

Am I very late figuring out that MJ is Mirror AJ?

256. MJ - January 14, 2011

@252 / CmdrR: “Nuke it from orbit. It’s the only way to be sure. Actually, I’m more concerned that we hear ANYthing from Lord Anthony.”

CmdrR, agreed. And the continued absence of Anthony is why is posted that extremely long repeating message above to try to get this or anyone else’s attention that this this thread is getting out of control. Advertisers and kids who like Star Trek read this stuff and we should be ashamed as a Trek community to have ourselves associated with XXX links posted here.

257. MJ - January 14, 2011

@255. LOL

258. MJ - January 14, 2011

@ 248. Mr. Takagi, I could talk about men’s fashion and industrialization all day but I’m afraid work must intrude, and my associate Theo has some questions for you, sort of fill in the blanks questions..

259. MJ - January 14, 2011

@247 @247. I disagree. I think we in the Trek Community are all better than this. And I’m not changing my opinion, nor am I going to bullied into going away. It is my firm and unyielding opinion that if you want to post hardcore XXX movies, you should not be doing that on Trekmovie.com. Is is not the place Star Trek fans should come to get access to XXX movies, and I know the advertisers on this site, as well as the parents of the minor who view this site, will agree with me. And Gene Rodenberry, who I knew in the late 70’s — I know that Gene would not approve of Star Trek being used to promote access to XXX movies.

260. ` - January 14, 2011

MJ – I agree that it was a mistake for the two XXX video links to have been posted here. Anthony did mention one of the links in the information part of this thread, but saw fit not to actually post it in this thread.

What I find *interesting* is that the posting of these two videos has caused you so much angst, but I don’t recall ever you complaining about the violence shown on the latest movie – eg Kirk being repeatedly punched in the face in the bar scene; a Romulan being run through by Sulu’s katanna, to name but two. (If I am wrong about this, I apologise and stand corrected).

You see, for me, this is a problem. Movie goers often have to accept the fact that quite possibly a genuinely interesting, exciting and entertaining movie will contain scenes of sometimes really awful gratuitous violence, but that’s OK. Another example of this is the Sherlock Holmes movie with Robert Downey Jr and Jude Law. Both the Star Trek and Sherlock Holmes movies received an MPAA rating of PG-13 and it seems this is not even legally enforceable in the US, unlike other parts of the world.

You know, personally I don’t want my Trek to show one of its main characters being repeatedly punched and bloodied by bullies or this same person shown being strangled within an inch of his life, etc etc. I don’t want my Star Trek to (continue to) be a franchise that allows violence of various kinds as a matter of course and where people who like explosions, destruction, death, scenes of cruelty and torture know they can come to get their fix. Star Trek is better than that. Unfortunately, all of what I have described has already occurred within the movies and all the television series.

However, I can recall no scene anywhere that depicts any kind of nudity, even someone coming out of a shower and reaching for a towel, let alone anything remotely considered XXX rated. When the latest movie did show a lovers’ scene, it was muted and interrupted by the return of a roommate. As Chris Pine described it “a flavour, not the full meal”. He was right. There was not even an “entree” or even an “after dinner mint”.

I am getting sick of this double standard. I have given my opinion of the two XXX videos posted and I wouldn’t like to see relationships presented in this way in any Star Trek, but I am tired of people freaking over the sight of a pubic hair or female nipple that may get shown on television and in some PG or M (NZ rating) movies.

261. Harry Ballz - January 14, 2011

250 “people engaged in sexual congress”

THX

Congress doesn’t get along THAT well! :>)

262. 24thCenturyRockStar - January 14, 2011

Whoa, looks like the fan-dumb finally kicked in! Gang, we’ve all seen this song-and-dance act before.

1) Someone from TrekMovie posts an (even slightly) adult themed article.

2) Trek fans begin posting their conversations on the thread (high brow or low).

3) Someone appoints themselves “Moral Guardian of Forever” and trolls the thread topic, article author, and various thread posters from some soapbox or another.

4) ????????

5) Profit.

Example:

http://trekmovie.com/2009/06/05/trekmovie-after-dark-trek-xxx-mr-skin-trek-trek-corsetss-st09-erotic-fanfic/

Read posts #105 – #108. Super-haters expecting Anthony P to swoop in and chop-shop the site (or this thread) because they feel they argued their opinions loudly enough may want to pay special attention to #108.

– 24thCRS!

263. MJ - January 14, 2011

@260

Nice arguments, but completely besides the point. The ST pourno are not part of Stat Trek, and are being falsely marketed by Larry Flint as “a parody” so that he can get around the legal ramifications of ripping off Star Trek to make a hardcore XXX film.

We can have a separate discussion of violence versus sex in cinema if you want, but it sounds like I’d be pretty much in agreement with you.

264. MJ - January 14, 2011

@262. In regards to that old thread you provided, I’m sure these comments from you must bring back some sentimental “good times” moments for you”

“Riker – hussies, hence it could be argued that he has a thing for ho’s.”

“Troi – a-holes and degenerates (except maybe Wyatt Miller), hence it could be argued that she’s something of a trollop – even Michael Dorn’s nickname for her was ’space whore’!”

Obviously you are in a minority here of guys who feel to have an extra purpose for their left hand when they watch episodes Star Trek. Enjoy your Star Trek pourno, because you dude represent the core market that Larry Flint and Hustler video are aiming for.

265. MJ - January 14, 2011

….addendum, and let’s not forget this classic post from the great 24th Century Rock Star…I must confess, it brings a tear to my reading some of these golden oldie posts of his:

“Oh yes, and a big kudos to Evan Stone for being committed enough to Trek that he CUT HIS HAIR juuuuust to play Capt. Kirk in Hustler’s new Trek production. That guy NEVER cuts his hair – we already have an idea what he’ll do for money, and trimming them locks ain’t one of ‘em – so it’s kind of a big deal for a guy like him to lop it off for a role. So if you’re a fan of the adult industry, involved with or circulate within that scene, or if adult entertainment isn’t your thing, I do hope that as Trek fans – we can at LEAST give a nod to a fella whose been a real trooper and shown his true Trek stripes in his own way….”

266. MJ - January 14, 2011

Here are a few of the posts from that old thread that tell a different story:

101. TrekMadeMeWonder – June 6, 2009
Undoubtedly the WORST Trekmovie article of ALL time.
Way to go guys.

109. Rick – June 6, 2009
101
“Undoubtedly the WORST Trekmovie article of ALL time”
I have to agree.

137. James Heaney – Wowbagger – June 6, 2009
Well, I see that my POV (”This crap don’t belong here nor anywheres what says its got class.”) is getting crucified in the TrekMovie poll, so I’ll respectfully bow out now. My final word on the subject: I’ve always thought of TrekMovie as a cut *above* io9. io9 is internet dreck, served to the lowest (and often quite hideous) common denominator. TrekMovie has always been, IMHO, much closer to the level of the mainstream media in reporting ferocity and publishing standards. I’m not gonna lie: I think pournougraphy is an inherently exploitative, dehumanizing medium, and seeing it given free publicity on TrekMovie is a huge let-down for me. But I’m *clearly* in the minority.
LLAP,
James

141. MC1 Doug – June 7, 2009
ewwwwwwww!!! The polling numbers for this survey are disturbing.
This type of puerile stuff definitely belongs on another blog-site… or at the least, a password encoded entry to gain access if it were to get any racier (I know some of the more juvenile readers in here at times just cannot keep their libidous in check). TREK has always had some amount of raciness to it, but tact prevailed… this stuff shows none of that.

146. TheBigCW – June 7, 2009
How to get away with making a STAR TREK fan film and not have problems with CBS/Paramount – Just make it a pourno and call it a “parody” :)

267. Phil - January 14, 2011

I’ve been moderated for comparing the fan films to cheap adult entertainment…and I stand by that comparison now!!

268. 24thCenturyRockStar - January 14, 2011

#263 – Cool story, bro.

Whatever floats your boat, or in this case, props up your soapbox. And just so you know, it’s not just my left hand – it’s both ;)

– 24thCRS

269. Anthony Pascale - January 14, 2011

MJ

Enough….TrekMovie will continue to very very periodically post something that is about something for adult consumption. We will never post porn imagery or anything like that, unlike other sites like io9, but this is news and we will report it

and spamming the comments section wont stop it

thank you for your thoughts

270. Anthony Pascale - January 14, 2011

and to some others, do NOT post links to any pornographic material again

271. 24thCenturyRockStar - January 14, 2011

That being said:

Boobies.

– 24thCRS

272. MJ - January 14, 2011

Anthony, message received, I will understand and comply. And:

WELCOME BACK !!!

273. MJ - January 14, 2011

Welcome back,
Your dreams were your ticket out.

Welcome back,
To that same old place that you laughed about.

Well the names have all changed since you hung around,
But those dreams have remained and they’re turned around.

Who’d have thought they’d lead ya (Who’d have thought they’d lead ya)
Here where we need ya (Here where we need ya)

Yeah we tease him a lot cause we’ve hot him on the spot, welcome back,
Welcome back, welcome back, welcome back.

274. garen - January 14, 2011

sheesh… on all accounts.

275. MJ - January 14, 2011

@274. Well put. This thread did devolve into something like a bad episode of Night Court. LOL

276. THX-1138 - January 18, 2011

Political correctness is folly. I welcome the subversive articles almost moreso than the straight-ahead or legit articles.

And everything is fodder for me to joke about. Well, except death, disease, and suffering.

In short, sex is good and violence not so much.

277. Harry Ballz - January 19, 2011

276. “And everything is fodder for me to joke about”

Fodder jokes are okay, but I really enjoy a good mudder-in-law joke!

278. Kat - January 30, 2011

Oh, MAN….I got here too late for the good links?!

TrekMovie.com is represented by Gorilla Nation. Please contact Gorilla Nation for ad rates, packages and general advertising information.