Original Star Trek Getting a CGI Makeover! | TrekMovie.com
jump to navigation

Original Star Trek Getting a CGI Makeover! August 28, 2006

by Anthony Pascale , Filed under: Rumor,TOS Remastered,Uncategorized , trackback

enterprise.JPGBefore JJ Abrams gets to bring the TOS era back to the big screen in Star Trek XI, CBS Paramount has a secret plan to get it back on the small screen, but with a makeover. Over a month ago it was announced that CBS was selling a new broadcast TV (not cable) syndication package for the original series. At the time it seemed a bit odd to try selling a 40 year old show to local TV stations, especially after it has just been sold to yet another cable outlet (this time TV Land…home of retro TV). The Trek Movie Report has now learned from trusted insiders, that CBS Paramount are actually offering an HDTV enhanced version of the Original Series with new state-of-the art CGI visual effects.

The ‘new’ Star Trek
Details are still being finalised, but according to sources, the bulk of shows will be as originally shot, with the new effects limited to the space sequences and the opening credits. In addition, TrekMovie.com has learned that some of the music is being redone (presumably for the opening title sequence). There are conflicting reports on exactly how many episodes are getting the ‘enhanced treatment’, but is possible that it is not all 79 original episodes. This also does not seem to be linked to the recent announcement for the Original Series to begin airing on TV Land in November, they will be showing the classic series in it’s original form. No word yet on if or when the enhanced series will be available on DVD, BluRay, or HD-DVD, but it appears that the newly enhanced shows will first appear in broadcast syndication this fall (so check local listings!). So far the Trek Movie Report has not been able to get an official comment from CBS Paramount, but TMR hears that an announcement from them will be coming very soon.

A CGI USS Enterprise as seen in the ‘Star Trek Enterprise’ Finale

Not totally new for Trek
Of course the most recent Trek show Star Trek: Enterprise was done entirely with CGI effects. This included creating a CGI version of the Starship Defiant from the TOS era for the ‘In a Mirror Darkly’ arc, as well as a brief shot of Kirk’s Enterprise for the series finale. Paramount also recently re-issued a ‘Director’s Edition’ of Star Trek: The Motion Picture with a number of redone and new CGI effects. And Trek is far from alone, George Lucas it seems can’t stop himself from tinkering with his classic Star Wars films, he has done it so often that this year he is issuing DVDs of the films in their original form. Although TMR did not learn who is doing the work, apparently it isn’t EdenFX (who did the visual effects for Enterprise seen above and below). If the ‘new TOS’ is a success, then perhaps we will see the same thing done with Star Trek: The Next Generation which has a 20th Anniversary coming up soon.

UPDATE: Digital Bits has also has a story on this with some other details

ANOTHER UPDATE: TrekMovie.com > HDTV Trek Will Air Out Of Sequence + More Details

AND NOW IT IS OFFICIALTV Guide: Star Trek Is Set On Stunning

TEST FOOTAGE: TrekMovie.com Talks to EdenFX

Check out the TrekMovie.com TOS-in-HD Subsite, for all the info on TOS in HD

(and click here for latest TOS in HD News)

A CGI USS Defiant, also from Enterprise


1. Spock's Kidney - August 28, 2006

Star Trek: The Special Edition.

Edith Keeler shoots first.

2. Wowbagger - August 28, 2006

Ooo… confirmation of The Digital Bits’ scoop from today! Joy. I didn’t really believe it, but now there are two sources saying it.

3. Anthony Pascale - August 29, 2006

I think his was posted just before mine, although I do have some more details than his. I had written it over the weekend (in fact I hinted at this story to you last week), but was waiting to get an \’official statement\’ from Para. When he put his up I figured the cat was out of the bag so I turned off the \’draft\’ button. If I do hear more this week I will just have to post an update.

I have been told that some things are in the air, so it is quite possible that when finally announced some things may have changed. But I am confident that we can expect some kind of announcement within two weeks, probably this week.

4. kitten - August 29, 2006

Well, take a look at this:


I found this about a week ago — just a couple of the opening scenes from “The Doomsday Machine”, but with updated special effects. Just as it says here, it looks like nothing was altered save for shots of ships and things like the main viewscreen. I was actually pretty impressed with the quality and unlike Lucas’ mucking about with Star Wars, I don’t think this detracts from the show at all.

5. gork - August 29, 2006

This is stupid…..

Paramount….how about just making the DVD’s cheaper? I don’t WANT a modified Star Trek. I want it as it is….spend your time making NEW shows.

6. Dodge - August 29, 2006

I think it is time we all get drunk on trania. Leave the CGI to the new shows and leave the old ones alone.

7. Anonymous - August 29, 2006

Oookaaay… Are the going to replace the giant albino unicorn gorilla and the giant talking rubber lizard with improved CGI?

Jar Jar Gorn, anyone?

8. Jon Rubin - August 29, 2006

The funny thing is, Star Trek didn’t NEED an update. Those old-style optical effects and model shots wear well in HD transfers. Film, after all, has more lines of content than even full HDTV.

It’s the sci-fi shows from the 1990s that are going to look worst in HD without getting a VFX makeover, because they used lots of cheap CGI shots that were never rendered in hi-def before being reverse-telecined back onto the film.

9. amcgltd - August 29, 2006

~ Still Can’t Find Reverse ~…

Slashdot linked up news of a CGI-enhanced edition of the original Star Trek TV series. For now looks like it’ll just be re-done FX sequences, but you never know what they’ll come up with once they open up the……

10. Anonymous - August 29, 2006

Why don’t they add a picture of Jonathan Archer to Captain Kirk’s Cabin room? :)

11. Monitortan - August 29, 2006

Star Trek 2.0…

Taking a page from George Lucas’ technically updated reissue of the original Star Wars films, Paramount plans to reissue the REAL Star Trek TV series, with new 21st century special effects…….

12. roebeet - August 29, 2006

As long as they learn from the mistakes that Lucas made, it should be fine. Leave the characters alone, and only update the “space” shots. It wasn’t that special effects weren’t impressive in the 1960’s (look at 2001 ASO, for example), it’s that Star Trek’s budget didn’t allow for anything all the impressive, most of the time. As long as if doesn’t totally detract from the episode, it would be a welcome change.

13. jon - August 29, 2006

I’ve always said they should re-do the effects from the original series like Lucas did w/wars.”Balance of Terror”and “The Doomsday Machine” beg for it.and I’ve always wondered where all those windows on the enterprise were .It would be cool if they could burn in a window looking out of the ship during a hallway shot or something.

14. Adam D. Hall - August 29, 2006

Will CBS Paramount also do a CGI makeover of “Star Trek: The Next Generation”, “Star Trek: Deep Space Nine”, “Star Trek: Voyager”, “Star Trek: The Animated Series” and the ten “Star Trek” feature films?

15. Spock - August 29, 2006

“To ‘CGI’ her… do as your heart tells you to do…. many millions will watch, those who did not watch before.”

16. Anonymous - August 29, 2006

‘Way to Eden’ now has a true Psychedelic Light Show Sequence.

17. Ben Future - August 29, 2006

For those that don’t care for the new effects I say fine. You can still buy the old style on DVD just like always. And be sure to keep living in the past and settling for less than you should.

18. Weyoun - August 29, 2006

Ben Future is correct, if this is oging to happen, none of you who are complaining aobut it being CGI’d need complain, since Paramount has already brought out TOS DVD’s, and the only thing they did with them is digitally remaster them.

There was rumors years ago, back when DS9 was still in production about remastering TOS in CGI.

This is a brilliant Idea, ok, so they can’t do much about the sets, but the can certainly do something about the now cheap looking transporter effects, phaser effects, monitors, as well as the space battles, like the Doomsday Machine, Balance of Terror, even The Enterprise incident with the Enterprise being surrounded by 3 Romulan Battlecruisers would look far better in the best quality of CGI has to offer nowadays, not to mention cloaking effects for the ships, and ships weapons effects.

19. Unsought Input » Blog Archive » Kirk and JarJar - August 29, 2006

[…] This one ought to get all you nerds’ Spider-Man undies in a bunch. Apparently, CBS Paramount plans to rejig the original Star Trek with new CGI graphics and a new main title sequence – a la George Lucas’s re-release of Star Wars Episodes IV, V and VI. The revamped episodes will appear on HDTV this fall. […]

20. darius - August 29, 2006

If they wanted to, they could rejig everything – the sets, the designs, the lot – given today’s technology. That is, make TOS look like it was made today and give it the look and feel to fit in with the other series.

But I would like to be able to have an unaltered HD set of TOS available as well, for the sake of historical perservation and nostalgia.

It strikes me as odd though, that the series in most need of this retrofitting is NextGen which has appaling video quality.

21. jon - August 29, 2006

I hope they ve made some advancements in CGI since Star Wars 3 .As good as the CGI was ,it still looked animated.CGI still doesn’t look as good as models.It’s hard to get a perspective on the forms as they move about ,especially as they turn in the foreground with other CGI elements in the background.I got lost visually in Star Wars 3 .I hope the producers of re-mastered Trek will resist the urge to crowd the screen with jerky ,busy,razzle-dazzle CGI stuff in favor of presenting a stronger graceful graphic image of a starship in flight.I’d love to see an slow detailed exterior shot that draws closer to the ship and enters through a window(for example).When you throw too much CGI at an audience ,it’s like your overcompensating.

22. jon - August 29, 2006

Will there be a book published with the conceptual artwork for re-mastered trek TOS visuals as there was for Ralph McQuarrie’s and Joe Johnson’s work on Star Wars?I don’t know what I’m looking more forward to ,Trek xi or re-mastered hdtv OS.

23. Old ‘Star Trek’ to be Reborn With New CGI « the 60 billion $$ man - August 29, 2006

[…] […]

24. Old School Fan-atic - August 29, 2006

Seems like they are just taking a nod from “Star Trek: New Voyages”, and based on the possibly authentic teaser from YouTube, not as impressive. :P

ST:NV may not have a huge budget, but their original scripts and homemade cgi more than make up for it. The integration of modern cgi into classic Trek, as with Star Wars, is glaring and out of place OR looks oddly amateurish, which is baffling for such a big budget project. Star Trek: New Voyages at least is consistent in style as of episode 2, “In Harm’s Way”. Episode 1, “Come What May”, even for a big fan of the project like me, was shakey, though in their defense it was the fan group’s 1st attempt at such a project…

25. Clickworthy Links » Cool Stuff for Tuesday - August 29, 2006

[…] 5. In a move to inject some new life and add new value to existing content, CBS Paramount is reworking Star Trek: TOS (The Original Series), just in time to celebrate its 40th anniversary. It seems they are going back and working in state-of-the-art CGI visual effects. And the final product will apparently be available in hi-def. Cool! Original Star Trek Getting a CGI Makeover! […]

26. Wowbagger - August 29, 2006

I know. You were *just* behind his, which stings. I can *not* figure out why the major Trek news sources (TT, TWeb, etc.) insist on linking to The Digital Bits’ piece. The only reason I saw TDB’s piece first (and referred to this as “confirmation”) is that TMR’s RSS is the one after TrekToday’s on my list, so I saw their headline first.

I certainly hope your scoop does draw new readers. But TrekToday and TrekWeb are going to have to start paying attention to you, first. *eyeroll at traditional Trek news sources*

Keep it up!

27. Anthony Pascale - August 29, 2006

oh its no biggie, I knew he was going to put it up, and of course the two validate eachother. And TMR got picked up by lots of places like G4TV and Slashdot so its all good. I did let both TrekWeb and TrekToday know that some of the speculation in the DB article about DVDs is almost certainly more for the long term and not for this year. Both TW and TT have covered TMR stories and I am sure they will continue to do so. This site is only 6 weeks old so everyone is still getting to know eachother.

28. Wowbagger - August 30, 2006

True, true. :)

29. Anonymous - August 30, 2006

The good news here is the HD transfer. The bad news might be the CGI stuff. I would hope they would only do what was necessary for it to look decent, which shouldn’t be too much if the film it was shot on is ok. What are they going to do about aspect ratio?

30. Anonymous - August 30, 2006

I think they should alter some of the bridge props as well. It could probably be done very easily. The bridge props were never really very convincing as computerized mechanisms. Of course I think they should keep a lot of the original elements, but where you would see blinking blocks of lights, that could be replaced with a tactical or sensor display monitor. That candy striped thing should definitely be replaced by something a little more spacey, because it looks like one of those spin wheels you can ourchase at spensors.

31. Anonymous - August 30, 2006


32. Anonymous - August 30, 2006

What I meant to say was, I think they should add elements that appear convincing as working mechanisms because none of the props are convincing at all, the audience is really forced to use their imagination with it and I always felt that was an unfortunate limitation that gene never intented. I think if he could have had the original series looking like the later shows he definitely would have. And as far as respecting the original prop makers and stuff, I think the fact that startrek is still alive is a testimony to their contribution, and the fact that people want to refurbish it now is a salute to what they began.

33. trekmaster - August 30, 2006

Is CGI technology ready to create a copy of Shatner-Kirk and Nimoy-Spock at the age of 33!? And if not, how long could it last to realize that?

34. Webomatica - August 30, 2006

Classic Trek CGI: Please No Jar Jar…

Since The Original Series Star Trek is coming up on its 40th anniversary, now there’s a possibility that the original episodes will be “enhanced” with CGI. I’m just hoping whomever is in charge of this project respects the &#822…

35. True Fan - August 31, 2006

Redoing Star Trek is another fizzag idea from the idiots that came up with this weak-ass, added-on “TOS” crap. The original show was called Star Trek. Period. It was only the later shows that have these extra names added on. If you want to remake something, remake “The New Generation”. Maybe you could put some CGI hair on Picard’s head and some CGI ‘nads in Rikers pants. You pizzusies always wanna f*ck up good sh*t. Stop f*ckin’ with Star Trek. F*uck the ST clones if you have to, but leave the original alone, for the rest of us.

36. trekmaster - August 31, 2006

@true fan
Really – very civilised lingual capabilities…

Using our god given sense of logic there’s only one thing to conclude: TOS won’t be destroyed just because some people put some make-up on it. As a true fan you should know that Star Trek is more than specal effects, but the youth of today will not see a 40 year old series with plastic starships. So Star Trek remains closed to the younger generation/ audience. But I’m sure your VHS/ DVD edition or the many repeats on countless TV channels are still being untouched…

37. Wowbagger - August 31, 2006

@ Trekmaster: Wrong. I am youth of today. I love the old sets, the old SFX. And I view the TOS bridge–including the wonderful candy-striped thing–as probably the most important piece of cardboard in Star Trek history. Trek told better stories on that one set than an other single set at any other time.

I *hope* this remade version is a more-or-less passing curiosity, a tribute, but not something like Star Wars: Special Edition. I look forward to it (let’s face it; IAMD had a fairly dull story… but it was such a joy to watch that it didn’t matter one iota), but, like it or not, the original Trek graphics are part of its magic.

38. Lektric Jezder - September 1, 2006

This is great! I was born the same year that Star Trek was born. One of my earliest memories is of being plopped down in front of the ol’ 25 inch Magnavox color console TV with stereo, and watching the Enterprise zip by during the opening credits. I’ve been watching ever since. What could be wrong with breathing a little new life into some old friends? I can’t wait for the day when our technology allows us to make all new episodes with the old characters. Imagine all new stories with 33-year-old Shatner and Nimoy and 40-year-old DeForest Kelly. That’d be cool. trekmaster knows.

39. INFINITYbound - There and Back » Original Star Trek series in for a refit - September 4, 2006

[…] Original Star Trek series in for a refit By Curved Space Trekkies rejoice. The space bumpers between the Bill Shatner scenery chewing will get a the modern CGI treatment. […]

40. Alex - September 7, 2006

Stupid, stupid, stupid idea. It’s an insult to all the craftsmen who made TOS a cutting-edge series in its day and it’s a rewriting of history just to pander to children who get attracted by the latest new shiny toy.

I’m boycotting the altered TOS. I have nothing against “cleaning it up” for HDTV — and that part of it looks good. But don’t revise the bloody thing. Roddenberry and Gene Coon are long dead. Their original vision should be kept as is. (I run hot and hold on the TMP redo; the original director was involved so that helped, but they made some silly decisions, too). This is as bad as taking Citizen Kane and turning “Rosebud” into an iPod, because kids today can’t identify with a little wooden sled. You tell me how this is any different.

41. Frank - September 15, 2006

This is a ridiculous idea purely motivated by greed on Paramount’s part. They’re looking for a way to release yet another set of DVDs for people to buy but don’t have any other ‘extras’ to add. You know they’re trying to think of a way to get the films released a third time, just like the “Star Wars” and “Lord of the Rings” films – how many editions of those are there now? The special effects will naturally look better in CGI by their very nature, but the action is uneeded and surpurflous.

The whole notion of making the series accessible or attractive to a younger generation is the same reasoning studios used when they colorized films. Someone show the evidence of the legions of young viewers that suddenly became fans of old B&W films after they were colorized (the same viewers that very likely weren’t watching old Technicolor films in the first place – because they were ‘old’). There aren’t any. Notice that video store shelves aren’t flooded with colorized editions because the theory doesn’t work. This CGI edit won’t make the series any more appealing to someone turned off to older series in the first place.

42. The Dork Report » Blog Archive » The Dork Report for September 1, 2006 - September 19, 2006

[…] Won’t redoing the special effects of a 40-year old sci-fi show spoil the enjoyable cheese? […]

43. robert dale snipes - September 20, 2006

startrek is a good moral show we need more shows like it if improving the grapics will bring a new generation to watch it so be it…..

44. Byron Law - October 5, 2006

This does not bother me because the originals are out on a non degradeable format. Its not like star wars where the original cuts were done away with. The new star wars DVDs with the original cuts are a mess because they are non-anamorphic widescreen so they look awful if time had been spent on them to create the anamorphic DVDs that are the basic standard of widescreen DVDs today it would be great. Lucasfilm cant claim that this cant be done as in the documentary Empire of Dreams which is in anamorphic widescreen on the bonus disc of the 2004 star wars DVDs there are multiple shots of the original cuts. This includes in anamorphic widescreen the original titles without a new hope(this also proves copies of a new hope from 1977 must exist in Lucasfilm’s vaults as the film has never ever been released on video laserdisc etc without the episode IV title added so where did this come from its not been digitally removed as the crawl is clearly manually done.) at the top, the original death star explosion among other scenes so this is just Lucasfilm not wanted to spend any cash on the old cuts.

This CGI stuff with Star Trek however is totally different. The original versions are out there to buy in a proper format that wont rot they have good extras nice packaging and are in there proper tv aspect ratios nice and cleaned up. Its a bit silly to put CGI in a 1960s tv show but its doing no harm and it will be interesting to see. Red Dwarf the 80s/90s scifi comedy did the same thing. They did up all the old CGI in the first 3 series(seasons) if i remember rightly but the funny thing is where as fans want to own both these done up versions and the originals they cant as only the originals are on DVD. The done up ones were on VHS and shown on TV only not bad either. Ill watch these new done up episodes and buy them nothing wrong with this as long as the originals are always out to buy.

45. Newber - November 30, 2006

I saw a mention on here of S”Star Trek: New Voyages”, and I just starting watching their latest, episode 2, “To Serve All My Day”, released on Thanksgiving. Ok, *NOW* this CGI re-do of TOS will have trouble competing with ST:NV. The production values on their latest episode are vastly superior to their prior episodes (pilot and 1st), and look far more seamless than the redone TOS.

46. robert dale snipes - December 10, 2006

my wife said they were considering william shatner for the new movie until he came to the set screaming SHOW ME THE MONEY!

47. S Appel - January 6, 2007

I have been watching the “new” Star Trek series airing on ABC. The new things that they have added are ok, but the whole picture quality is bad, bad, bad!!!!!!!!! The bridge scenes are so dark you can’t see any details, so are other scenes, especially if they are a dark one already. Anything red in a scene could be used for Rudolph’s nose – it GLOWS! Add the special effects if you want to but clean up the darkness and glowing red off the picture.

48. Johnny K - January 29, 2007

How did they make the stars on the on the original Star Trek episodes. When you see the Enterprise shooting through space, how did they make the stars appear. What type of special effects did they use? Does anybody know? I’m not that big of a Star Trek fan, but a fan none the less. I’m just curious to know how they produced the stars when the ship was soaring through space, thats all.

Johnny K

49. John D - February 12, 2007

I’ve been watching the original series again with the enhanced graphics and I like it !

50. benny - April 6, 2007

i love star trek enterprise but im deutch so i wath it in englich whit deutch under titel

51. Green - April 25, 2007

Hi Sam! Photos i send on e-mail.

52. icqpxpurqu - June 22, 2007

Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! iplfyqnuqw

53. Waelse - June 25, 2007

Zu Benny

Die Amerikaner machen nicht DVDs mit deutsche Untertitels. Sie denken, dass alle Fremdsprache sind Spanisch oder Franzoesisch. Ich habe seit meine Ankunft gesucht, und ich fand keine, dass populaer sind.

Alles Gute

54. anon - July 3, 2007


I think I have to buy the real original series before this crap remake pushes it off the market.

I already can’t get copies of the original versions of Star Trek movies I or II.

55. Moreau. - August 5, 2007

No, you’re All Wrong. They didn’t have the technology, otherwise they would’ve done it. And The Star Wars Films could’ve been great too. if only they’d work hard and not think, i’ll do whatever i feel like doing, even if it’ll ruin it. This is welcome. But don’t ruin anything. Leave The I.S.S Enterprise to look just like the U.S.S. Enterprise. And Change The Character only a bit. But That’s It. CGI Is WAY Better Than Stop Motion or any other old technology.

56. black touch - August 25, 2007

57. powerdiddy - October 20, 2007

Sacreligious!!! Why don’t we spruce up william shakespeare while we are at it! This show is one of the most influential in the history of TV. Here were are changing it so it sells better! phewey!!!! makes me sick

58. daylitekaty - November 19, 2007

Ohmigod! I had no idea this was going on. I was just flipping channels over the weekend and came across an episode of Star Trek. I was only watching with half an eye (folding laundry or something at the same time.) After all, it’s not like I hadn’t seen each episode dozens of times. But I still like watching classic TV. Then all of a sudden there was a shot of the shuttlecraft leaving the shuttle bay. As it lifted off, it banked, turned and headed out into space. My jaw dropped open and my first thought was, I…don’t…remember….that…ever…happening. Did I just see what I saw? I continued to watch, and sure enough, external shots of the Enterprise and its maneuvers were definitely different. Ohmigod! Why, why, why would they do that? THEY CHANGED STAR TREK! This is so stupid. For one thing, the new shots are obviously more modern and they’re so blatently incongruous with the rest of the program. It makes no sense to change something just because you can. I don’t mind using technological talents to restore scenes to their original glory, but you DON’T CHANGE THEM. I agree with others here that say it’s just a way to re-package the DVD’s to make more money. They obviously don’t care about integrity.

59. Donald Lee - November 19, 2007

As a long time “trekkie”, I’ve seen a few of the new enhanced episodes and I’m impressed. I think they are great and hope they enhance all the old episodes. Way to go Paramount!!

60. Neil - April 19, 2008

> … I don’t mind using technological talents to restore scenes to their original glory…

That could be a 3rd version.

. The 1st version, the original show
. The 2nd version, replacing the plastic models with computer-generated effects
. The 3rd verion, with the old effects “gently enhanced,” like a remastering

And of course, I’ll have to get all three sets of DVDs.

61. Kazelvzx - July 14, 2008

Hi!fcng! http://znqooeiv.com oxjfe vowfd http://krpbghzs.com ukfqj dcisq

62. Kazelbkd - July 14, 2008

Hi webmaster!

63. Kevin - September 24, 2008

Ben Future – August 29, 2006
For those that don’t care for the new effects I say fine. You can still buy the old style on DVD just like always. And be sure to keep living in the past and settling for less than you should.

You are wrong on so many levels it’s ridiculous. This is a classic TV show and does not need to be touched. It’s not about settling for less. The show was made in the best way possible with the technology of the time. That’s what makes it a timeless classic. I don’t need, nor want, to see enhanced special effects for a classic TV show.

What’s next? Digitally enchancing Fonzie’s water skis to give him a more spectacular jump over the shark? You’ve missed the point completely. This is just another Double-Dip effort from Paramount, and these enchancements will do NOTHING for the episodes. If you are a true Star Trek fan, you will treasure and enjoy them for what they were.

I curse George Lucas for the day he brought Digitally Enchancing Already Classic Movies.

64. asgcut zyelhirdq - October 14, 2008

pifjntewz ujnwdq frzn zwijhy wftgarljd dson uayoeipjq

65. Kobayashi Maru - November 9, 2008

Please let us know when the CGI old series will be released for purchase. . . .hurry boys hurry. . .Maru

66. Chris - December 6, 2008

Eff Lucas! He started all of this.

My nephew bought me the Star Wars trilogy–OK. His mother paid for it. I was thrilled until we sat back and started watching it. I kept having to point out all the changes, the abominations! He did not get my point. sigh…..

What is next? Fixing Mona Lisa’s smile?

To quote a certain lawyer: I may be getting ready.



67. Chris - December 6, 2008

re: 3. Anthony Pascale

blah blah


68. Chris - December 6, 2008

re: roebeet

I feel the Enterprise IS a character.

And, in fact, her new look, imo, SUCKS!

She had the best look industry could do at the time. Always a good thing.
She now has a somewhat less.

FVCK those who tolerate the rewriting of history.

69. Chris - December 6, 2008

Why can’t the gays just leave the past alone?
The world is best with them in the closet:
The Louvre Rocks, etc.
Bad is bad.
Too much of it is a bad thing.
Peace. Rock Out!

70. Luke Young - October 18, 2009

Several scenes have been deleted in the makeovers, unfortunately:

Assignment Earth: Roberta Lincoln is wrestling with Spock and pulls off his cap in the tussle, just before Gary Seven escapes through his transporter. – DELETED.

Requiem for Methusela:
“To be human is to be complex. You can’t avoid a little ugliness… from within and from without.” [Piano]
“Why don’t you play the waltz, Mr. Spock?”
“To be human is also to seek pleasure, to laugh, to dance.”
“Rayna is a most accomplished dancer.”

Dagger of the Mind:
Many seconds of Dr. Helen Noel’s crawling on her hands and knees through a long air duct – DELETED.

… to name a few.

71. simureal - January 28, 2010

where can i get the original series as is on dvd? is there a “clean” version and not the “cleaned” version?

72. Tom - February 13, 2010

When will the Original Star Trek Series remastered in CGI start running again on television?
It premiered for the 40th anniversary on September 16, 2006 and ended this run in July 2009. Was it broadcast on the UPN and FOX networks just to promote sales of the new remastered DVD releases? I certainly hope that’s not the case.

73. Tom - February 13, 2010

Anybody having any information on when the original Star Trek series remastered in CGI will air again, please e-mail me. Thanks!


74. Tom - February 13, 2010

I think the original Star Trek series (1966 – 1969) beats ST The Next Generation (1987 – 1994) hands down! (with and without CGI)

What do you all think ?

75. John Ferguson - December 3, 2010

Just saw “Where No Man Has Gone Before” on watchtrek .com Sorry, but I think the CGI makeover was a mistake. Kind of jarring and they have already aged worse than the old effects.

76. Kevin Tejeiro - August 24, 2011

some conditions its a ache from the ass to assessment what online internet internet site proprietors authored but this online internet internet site is honestly consumer genial !!

77. Jim - March 23, 2012

I watched ST:TOS at original airing as a child in the 1960’s and have re-watched the series many times since. Since I got Netflix, I began rewatching the HD version and am very impressed. The picture is so big and clear you can clearly see the stunt doubles in fight scenes for example. I first noticed some space scenes looked better than I remembered in Wrath of Khan and The Trouble With Tribbles thinking, wow, that looks so great in HD!

Last night I watched The Doomsday Machine and that was the clincher. The space scenes looked so good and natural I thought – did it look like this as originally aired? Then I went to bed and began replaying the epsiode in my mind and recalled much cruder space scenes. Yes, it was remastered and it does look much better! I disagree with the comment from Jon Rubin “Trek didn’t NEED an update. Those old-style optical effects and model shots wear well in HD transfers” – film transfers but cheap fx and crude models do not xfer well. Many space scenes looked bad then and worse today. I LOVE the new make over, it looks GREAT and fits very naturally. It is almost like it was always this way and my memories of the bad fx were figments!

TrekMovie.com is represented by Gorilla Nation. Please contact Gorilla Nation for ad rates, packages and general advertising information.